хочу найти девочку на годовой расклад на 78 карт 🧟♀️ он выглядит так:
❤44💋23🔥13💘2

Channel
@vidyadevi_eso
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,078subscribers
-86 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001827522036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vidyadevi_eso |
| Description | канал таролога & практика тантрической традиции 🗡️ канал с услугами — https://t.me/nswersgirls |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vidyadevi_eso |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:49 | 9,078 | -19 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 9,097 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 9,110 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 9,129 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 9,130 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 9,151 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 9,158 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:55 | 9,166 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 9,168 | -8 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 9,176 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 9,175 | +192 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 8,983 | -26 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 9,009 | -28 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 9,037 | -39 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 9,076 | -43 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 9,119 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 9,132 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 9,139 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 9,156 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 9,171 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (9 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 20,814 |
| Reactions total | 2,379 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5,456 reactions across 25 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,886 | 34.6% | |
| 💋 | 834 | 15.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 833 | 15.3% | |
| 💘 | 511 | 9.37% | |
| 😍 | 358 | 6.56% | |
| 🔥 | 346 | 6.34% | |
| 🍓 | 305 | 5.59% | |
| 🕊 | 284 | 5.21% | |
| 😭 | 40 | 0.733% | |
| 😘 | 25 | 0.458% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 0.348% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 0.257% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.018% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
хочу найти девочку на годовой расклад на 78 карт 🧟♀️ он выглядит так:
❤44💋23🔥13💘2
я купила обучение по таро тота там полное обучение 63000 r я ни о чем не жалею я счастлива ! у меня сейчас такие соединения в небе, что меня аж тянет изучать всё
❤77❤🔥38🔥32💋13😱11💘1
хахаахаза недавно в чате ведьм мне кто то доказывал что мантры у них работают ! и без посвящения ! и без чтения ! просто слушаешь и она помогает в практике ! чернокнижнику !!! мне скинули «мантру шивы» с ютуба, но там нет самой мантры, автор вырезал супер важные части текста от непосвященных, а эти части и запускают процесс ХААХАХА то есть, эти практики просто слушали речь на санскрите лол и доказывали мне, что эт…
❤110🔥79❤🔥61🍓14💘6
если я умру я не хочу быть похороненной вдруг на мою могилу придёт какой-то идиот, накапает воском и разбросает яйца, а потом поставит через мои остатки кривой приворот ? и не дай бог кто то будет снимать тиктоки с моей фоткой, зарабатывая на истории моей смерти wtf почему это нормализуется, может я не понимаю моральный кодекс некро практиков ? я насмотрелась вичтока и очень злюсь
❤123🔥63🕊40🍓9💘8
durgā & kālī взаимосвязь богинь богиня проявляется в наш мир в различных формах, это одна сила которая пронизывает собой всю вселенную «поклонение богине, которая во всех существах пребывает как сознание, как разум, как сон, как голод, как тень, как сила, как заблуждение..» dm durgā и kālī это одна богиня, но в разных формах: в гневной и предельно гневной :) это можно отследить в тексте деви махатмьи, где описыва…
❤79💋53❤🔥42🔥8💘3🕊3
durgā | «недосягаемая» непобедимая воительница, хранительница мира, убийца демонов и просто моя самая любимая devi мне очень тяжело выразить свои чувства к ней и мне кажется невозможным описать её природу в одном посте, но давайте я расскажу о ней чуть больше символизм богини традиционно дурга изображается с большим количеством рук, это говорит о её способности решать проблемы различными способами и подбирать искус…
❤🔥93💋64😍44❤18🍓11💘7🕊5
я думаю у нас с таро тота связь из прошлой жизни
❤79❤🔥58🔥37😍8💘3🍓2👍1
заказала из индии мурти махаганапати [ статуэтку бога ганеши с большим количеством рук очень крутая форма, чем больше рук тем лучше, вау ] 16.000 rub выйдет за маленькую статуэтку 🚬 а у кого то пуджи за 1000 р продаются
❤81❤🔥51😍39💘12⚡2😱2
ответы на расклад 🤩 00:01 — I вариант 06:50 — II вариант 12:25 — III вариант выбрать личный расклад
🍓103❤86💋68😘17⚡4❤🔥4🔥4💘2
к чему сейчас стремиться выбирай I / II / III вариант
💋191❤🔥154💘120😭25❤12⚡6🔥6🍓3
таро темных ангелов
😍114❤🔥83💋60💘13❤6
я вижу что на меня подписаны много украинцев, в том числе в тиктоке напоминаю, ко мне можно записаться оплата будет на украинскую карту , и со мной можно державною, кому удобно 🇺🇦
❤71💘55❤🔥25💋12😭6😍3😘2🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @vidyadevi_eso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vidyā devi | эзотерика & таро” (@vidyadevi_eso), 9,078 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vidyadevi_eso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.