Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 维咔VikACG通知频道 - 资源、学术讨论与漫画

Channel

维咔VikACG通知频道 - 资源、学术讨论与漫画

@vikacg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,297subscribers

+162 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193246093
TypeChannel
Username@vikacg
Created30 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vikacg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,13515,29915,2176 August 2026 — 15,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,137 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,141 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,150 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,162 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,169 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,179 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,180 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,201 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,212 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,225 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,234 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,235 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,248 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,249 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,248 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,256 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,258 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,264 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,270 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,265 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,275 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,276 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,285 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,280 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,275 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,276 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,280 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,292 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,299 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,297 subscribers15,2976 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net +162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,110–15,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:0115,297-2
16 Sept 2026, 22:2015,299+7
14 Sept 2026, 21:0015,292+12
13 Sept 2026, 04:4115,280+4
11 Sept 2026, 09:5615,276+1
8 Sept 2026, 15:5915,275-5
5 Sept 2026, 11:2015,280-5
3 Sept 2026, 16:1815,285+9
2 Sept 2026, 11:1315,276+1
1 Sept 2026, 09:5415,275+10
31 Aug 2026, 06:3415,265-5
30 Aug 2026, 03:1515,270+6
29 Aug 2026, 05:3415,264+6
28 Aug 2026, 04:4215,258+2
27 Aug 2026, 04:3515,256+8
26 Aug 2026, 03:2715,248-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:1415,249+1
23 Aug 2026, 16:2615,248+13
21 Aug 2026, 23:4815,235+1
20 Aug 2026, 17:3715,234first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.80%
avg views ÷ 15,297 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held34 (9 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total9,540
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

618 reactions across 30 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣11718.9%
😁8513.8%
💩569.06%
👏436.96%
🤡416.63%
406.47%
🤮386.15%
🗿315.02%
🤨284.53%
👍274.37%
😇203.24%
😱182.91%
👎172.75%
🥰172.75%
🙊91.46%
🤯81.29%
🐳60.971%
💯50.809%
🌭20.324%
🍌20.324%
5 further kinds81.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 618 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC823 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

近期有多名用户反馈维咔浏览器内“迅雷网盘”链接无法内部唤起自动跳转至迅雷,我们经过多次排查不同用户后,得出可以一致给所有受影响用户的建议: 你倒是看看我们是不是在手机系统的管控中心里面啊啊啊啊啊啊(惊声尖叫)

🤣14😁5👾1🤪1

29 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,070 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣14🤯7😱3🌭2

28 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC≈1,220 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

有关注册时无法显示验证码和部分更新后的内容的浏览量被腰斩的问题,我们现已查明,原因为:马来人会飞~马来人会飞~(真实原因太尴尬,不可能给你的,放心吧),现已修复

6

26 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,630 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

马来人会飞,马来人会飞~

🤡24😁2

24 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,820 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

这是我从大葱哥那里下到的GTA6,大家看看有什么不对吗?

🤡14🤣5👍3💩1💯1😁1

21 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,050 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💩18

19 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC≈2,350 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😱15😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @vikacg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“维咔VikACG通知频道 - 资源、学术讨论与漫画” (@vikacg), 15,297 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vikacg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.