25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,632–23,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 23:59
23,665
-3
1 Sept 2026, 21:33
23,668
+5
31 Aug 2026, 18:38
23,663
-3
30 Aug 2026, 21:48
23,666
+3
29 Aug 2026, 18:35
23,663
-7
28 Aug 2026, 20:04
23,670
+4
27 Aug 2026, 22:15
23,666
-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:14
23,667
-1
25 Aug 2026, 19:47
23,668
-1
24 Aug 2026, 18:25
23,669
+4
23 Aug 2026, 02:52
23,665
+3
21 Aug 2026, 17:37
23,662
-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:37
23,663
-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:18
23,665
+3
18 Aug 2026, 11:16
23,662
+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:26
23,661
+4
15 Aug 2026, 18:59
23,657
-11
14 Aug 2026, 10:24
23,668
+9
13 Aug 2026, 03:15
23,659
+2
12 Aug 2026, 01:42
23,657
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 23,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
48 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
135,689
Reactions total
5,067
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,370
Videos
≈892
Links
≈918
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9h 37m
Average length
28m 54s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,067 reactions across 48 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,397
47.3%
❤
1,483
29.3%
👍
783
15.5%
👏
266
5.25%
🤔
51
1.01%
🥰
24
0.474%
❤🔥
12
0.237%
🙏
9
0.178%
✍
8
0.158%
🥴
8
0.158%
💯
6
0.118%
😱
4
0.079%
🤣
4
0.079%
🍾
2
0.039%
👌
2
0.039%
😁
2
0.039%
😢
2
0.039%
🤯
2
0.039%
😍
1
0.02%
🤷♀
1
0.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Похвастушки от Ольги из Курса "Бесшовное вязание сверху".
"Вика, добрый день! Делюсь результатом: платье из шёлка полностью связано в рамках курса. Я очень Вам благодарна, столько для себя открыла фишек, которые пригодятся во всех следующих проектах! И вот очередной проект тоже хочу связать сверху, но не уверена что справлюсь: получится ли сверху без швов связать узор сеткой? Хочу тунику пляжную."
Ольга, прекрасная …
Вяжем капюшон крючком из бабушкиных квадратов | Пошаговый МК для новичков
Девчонки, в этом видео я покажу, как связать стильный и тёплый капюшон крючком из бабушкиных квадратов.
Это простой, быстрый и невероятно эффектный проект, который подойдёт даже новичкам.
Мы разберём:
– как вязать идеальный бабушкин квадрат;
– как соединять мотивы так, чтобы капюшон держал форму;
– какую пряжу выбрать, чтобы изделие получилос…
Похвастушки от Ольги из Совместника Кардиган Луксор.
"Спасибо огромное, Вика, за ваш МК, прекрасно все получилось! Под Вашим чутким руководством и не могло быть иначе❤️🫶
В планах теперь такой же чёрный и белый с пайетками))))"
Олька, очень красивый кардиган! Прекрасная работа! Браво! 💫💫💫
▶️▶️ Совместник Кардиган Луксор
Сайт
https://vikiknitting.place/product/sovmestnik-dzhemper-avrora-kopirovat/
Бусти
https://b…
Девчонки, по результатам нашего опроса эту модель в совместнике мы вязать не будем.
Но раз она многим всё-таки понравилась, я решила просто подарить вам схему бесплатно 🎁🧶
Сохраняйте, пользуйтесь и вяжите с удовольствием! ❤️
Похвастушки от Натальи из Совместника топ Лотос.
Наталья, прекрасная работа! Браво! 💫💫💫
▶️▶️ Совместник топ Лотос
Сайт
https://vikiknitting.place/product/sovmestnik-top-lotos/
Бусти
https://boosty.to/vikiknitting/posts/77282a64-a0cf-4c0f-9bc6-264ad60227ac?share=post_link
Сегодня последний день самой низкой цены!!!!ПОСПЕШИТЕ!!!
Сайт
https://vikiknitting.place/product/sovmestnik-kardigan-luksor-kopirovat/
Boosty
https://boosty.to/vikiknitting/posts/abcd1c96-5dde-4bf7-a5e0-537c02902871?share=ios_post_link
Похвастушки от Юлии из Совместника поло Наоми.
"Вот так на мне. Довольна как слон. Вика спасибо огромное за вдохновение."
Юлия, шикарная работа! Поло прекрасное, сидит отлично! 💫💫💫
▶️▶️ Совместник поло Наоми
Сайт
https://vikiknitting.place/product/sovmestnik-polo/
Бусти
https://boosty.to/vikiknitting/posts/356b01d0-2d24-4422-8ee9-17c089abad44
Сегодня в рубрике ПОДИУМ Школы рукоделия с Викой свои работы представляет Екатерина.
"Спасибо Виктория, что вдохнавляете нас на такие чудесные изделия. Вязать с вами просто песня. И вся ваша команда просто супер, девочки профессионалы, всё подскажут и на путь истинный наставят!!!"
Джемпер и кардиган Эйфория Перфекциониста (МК с Викой)
Сайт
https://vikiknitting.place/product/master-klass-po-vyazaniyu-kardiganaejfori…
Похвастушки от Дарьи из Совместника Кардиган Луксор.
"Наконец-то я в Кардиган Луксор в образе:
Спасибо, Вика, за понятную подачу материала, за изысканный и стильный кардиган🙏🏻💜
Моя третья вещь из серии « тяжелый люкс»💃🔥💃"
Дарья, это восторг! Какой красивый кардиган! Какой цвет, какое исполнение! Браво! 💫💫💫
▶️▶️ Совместник Кардиган Луксор
Сайт
https://vikiknitting.place/product/sovmestnik-dzhemper-avrora-kopirovat…
Сегодня подробно разбираем эффектный ажурный узор спицами с косами — именно тот узор, который вы видите на джемпере.
Показываю вязание по петлям и по рядам, чтобы вы смогли повторить узор вместе со мной. Сочетание крупных кос, ажура и фактурных элементов выглядит очень эффектно и отлично подойдёт для джемперов, свитеров, кардиганов и других вязаных моделей.
🧶 ВАЖНО!
Полное трёхчасовое видео совместника по вязанию э…
Как связать карман уже на готовой детали - без пришивания? 🧶
Показываю короткий фрагмент из нашего тест-совместника «Конфитюр».
В совместнике подробно, шаг за шагом, разбираем:
- как связать такой карман прямо на готовой детали без пришивания;
- как аккуратно вшить молнию;
- как связать японское плечо;
-и, конечно, полностью вяжем худи «Конфитюр» от начала до конца.
❤70🔥43👍15❤🔥3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @vikiknit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Стильное вязание, СХЕМЫ @stilnoe_vjazanie · 52,047 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Антон Алексеев @Ant0HAlex · 50,738 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вяжем с Викой🧶” (@vikiknit), 23,665 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vikiknit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.