Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for village"ton

Channel

village"ton

@villageton

Has discussion group13 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,661subscribers

-732 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002008985821
TypeChannel
Usernames@aifundation @artsgenetic @chinacollector @crewlog @dnsportal @myforge @mygiftwallet @newsdns @redomascot @scroogeloot @tonuniversenews @usergifts @villageton
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/villageton

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,66120,39320,0277 August 2026 — 20,393 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,393 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,388 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,389 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,379 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,378 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,363 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,333 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,317 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,270 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,259 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,231 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,199 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,176 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,136 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,094 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,073 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,050 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,020 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,001 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,993 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,955 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,932 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,909 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,902 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,885 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,868 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,791 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,782 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,782 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,739 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,742 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,716 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,715 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,697 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,697 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,661 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,661 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
39 measurements spanning 41 days, net -732. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,551–20,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:4119,661no change
17 Sept 2026, 12:2019,661-36
15 Sept 2026, 13:0119,697no change
15 Sept 2026, 10:4019,697-18
13 Sept 2026, 19:3919,715-1
13 Sept 2026, 19:1819,716-26
12 Sept 2026, 01:2219,742+3
12 Sept 2026, 00:0119,739-43
10 Sept 2026, 00:5619,782no change
10 Sept 2026, 00:4719,782-9
9 Sept 2026, 19:1719,791-77
6 Sept 2026, 12:5719,868-17
4 Sept 2026, 06:2019,885-17
2 Sept 2026, 22:0619,902-7
1 Sept 2026, 19:0419,909-23
31 Aug 2026, 17:1319,932-23
30 Aug 2026, 18:4419,955-38
29 Aug 2026, 15:4319,993-8
28 Aug 2026, 17:5720,001-19
27 Aug 2026, 19:4620,020first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.49%
avg views ÷ 19,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held36 (13 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total7,660
Reactions total233
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,324 reactions across 36 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁24118.2%
👏22216.8%
👀21516.2%
🤔20615.6%
⚡17313.1%
❤906.80%
👍544.08%
🔥423.17%
✍251.89%
🤣221.66%
🤝201.51%
😢60.453%
💯50.378%
👎10.076%
😐10.076%
🥱10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,324 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
633
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 36 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
152
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @villageton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,030 views39 reactions50 Starsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @reseachy

Posted without readable text

👏14🤔6👀5😁5⚡3❤3🔥3

30 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,230 views36 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😁11👏7👀6⚡4🤔4💯2🤣2

28 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC≈1,270 views39 reactions50 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

bullish 💀 теперь к профилю / каналу можно привязать до 20 юзеров. ранее лимит составлял 10. telegram keeps feeding the flippers 🤤 source: @villageton

👀14👏7😁6⚡4🤔4👍2🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,340 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👏8⚡6👀6🤔4😁4❤2✍1

27 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,330 views38 reactions50 Starsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👏12👀7🤔5😁5⚡4👍3❤2

26 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,460 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🤝14⚡9👏7👀5👍4🤔4😁4❤3

22 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,510 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🤔8😁8👀6⚡4👏4❤3😐1

17 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈1,700 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👏11🤔7😁6⚡5👀5❤2🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈4,960 views60 reactions11 Starsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤16🔥12😁8👀6👏6🤔5⚡4🤝3

13 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,730 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😁11⚡5👀5🤔5👏4💯1🤣1

13 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,720 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😁10👀5🤔5⚡4👏4✍2

12 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,430 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😁10⚡6👏6🤔5👀4🔥2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @villageton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Деньги, игры и крипта
@dengi_igry_i_cripta · 28,446
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
🇷🇺 ТЧГ
@memehod · 30,294
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
LION | AIRDROPS
@LIONA1RDROPS · 88,522
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
Брюс Говорит
@bruce_club · 38,277
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
Capital Channel | ارز دیجیتال
@capital_channel · 73,260
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
کریپتو | ماینینگ | ارز
@airdrop_iranixvip · 74,585
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
Freeairdropland | گیفت تلگرام
@freeairdropland1 · 135,292
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
اخبار اقتصادی
@digital_khabar · 226,004
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
ACE CRYPTO
@acenot · 28,674
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
عصر نوین| AminiYT
@asrnovin_ir · 156,116
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
امیرحسین ولیان / تولید محتوا / هوش مصنوعی / اپلیکیشن / پرامپت
@amirhoseinvalian · 33,817
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
🖤اخبار تکنولوژی | هک و امنیت
@TechHackNews · 64,172
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“village"ton” (@villageton), 19,661 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/villageton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.