Channel
@vinolars_design
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-219 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003363725274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vinolars_design |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vinolars_design |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 1 | -209 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:09 | 210 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 214 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 220 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350668015383908012 | 16 | 44.4% | |
| custom 5348245817037723319 | 5 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5348318170056791604 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5350496835167362435 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5350382520317811928 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5350407847739956609 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5348563515768610041 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5350819052203843845 | 1 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Небольшой опрос, в какой сфере вы работаете?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 53483181700567916042custom 53482458170377233191custom 53504078477399566091custom 53506680153839080121
Прошло не много времени, как вы уже добили 30 кликов в конкурсе, в честь этого дропаю вам небольшой подарок🦋 Сегодня собрал вам список полезных сайтов / инструментов для дизайна, сюда входят сайты так и для улучшения качества, так и для всяких полезных штук для графического дизайна🪧 Нейросеть, очень хороший бот, каждый раз пользуюсь (бывает что кончается лимит)😭 @GPT4Telegrambot Сайт для удаления фона https://www.…
custom 53503825203178119281custom 53506680153839080121
Напоминаю про конкурс вам🥳 30 кликов - секретный подарок для вас👌
custom 53506680153839080124
На кого вы ставили?💵
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
-Хата...
И у тех, у кого не получается добавить папку, кину вам ссылки на все каналы, на которые нужно подписаться для участия: https://t.me/vinolars_design https://t.me/SethetChannel https://t.me/karasuDesign https://t.me/uvog1nn_design https://t.me/moniks_design https://t.me/noxlanstg https://t.me/goldydesigne
custom 53482458170377233191custom 53508190522038438451
Возникли некоторые проблемы с папкой, вот замена старой: https://t.me/addlist/wPCXyzDf9rcxNjQy
custom 53506680153839080121
Что у нас там по конкурсу кстати? не забываем участвовать)🤩
Написать в лс: @vinolarsgfx
37
custom 53482458170377233191
ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ
🏅Запускаю конкурс вам: Суть конкурса, угадать загаданное мной число от 1 до 50 приз: 15 звезд и аватарка Угадываем в комментах😎
custom 53503825203178119281custom 53504968351673624351custom 53506680153839080121
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vinolars_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Небольшой опрос, в какой сфере вы работаете?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На кого вы ставили?💵
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всем здарова, уже прошло половины лета, как у вас обстоят дела по заработку?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vinolars_design named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VINOLARS DESIGN ПЕРЕХОДНИК” (@vinolars_design), 1 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vinolars_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.