26 measurements spanning 35 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,220–10,270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 04:41
10,264
+2
6 Sept 2026, 22:40
10,262
-1
4 Sept 2026, 07:36
10,263
+4
2 Sept 2026, 21:46
10,259
-2
1 Sept 2026, 18:46
10,261
+4
31 Aug 2026, 17:26
10,257
+4
30 Aug 2026, 14:13
10,253
+6
29 Aug 2026, 12:03
10,247
-3
28 Aug 2026, 11:03
10,250
+1
27 Aug 2026, 09:26
10,249
+2
25 Aug 2026, 10:03
10,247
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:32
10,248
+3
20 Aug 2026, 09:53
10,245
+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:35
10,244
+4
18 Aug 2026, 10:48
10,240
+4
17 Aug 2026, 13:05
10,236
-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:14
10,237
+4
14 Aug 2026, 15:37
10,233
-3
13 Aug 2026, 03:38
10,236
+6
12 Aug 2026, 03:08
10,230
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 10,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
25 (9 June 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
15,370
Reactions total
641
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,476 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,166
47.1%
❤
607
24.5%
😁
358
14.5%
🤔
189
7.63%
😢
98
3.96%
👌
58
2.34%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @virastaar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
با توجه به رواج روزافزون بهرهگیری از هوشوارههای گوناگون در تألیف و ترجمهی کتابها، به نظر میرسد نیاز است ناشرها بندی از این قرار به قراردادهایشان بیفزایند:
«پدیدآور تعهد میدهد هر گونه استفادهی تعیینکننده و غیرمتعارف از هوش مصنوعی را به اطلاع ناشر برساند.»
قرار نیست به جنگ آسیابهای بادی برویم، ولی قطعاً باید روشن باشد که نقش پدیدآور در نوشتن یا برگرداندن اثر چیست و چه بخش از کار را عامل انسانی و چه بخش از آن…
یک پرسش مهم: در میان نامزدها، سه کتاب بودهاند که از زبانهای ایتالیایی، آلمانی و ترکی استانبولی ترجمه شدهاند. هیچیک از اعضای محترم هیئت داوران این جایزه هیچیک از این سه زبان را نمیداند! پس چطور فهمیدهاند که ترجمهی این آثار خوب است یا بد؟ با کمک هوش مصنوعی؟ مگر میشود دور هم جمع شوی که به ترجمهی کتابی جایزه بدهی اما حتی زبان اصلی آن را ندانی؟
من احترام خیلی زیادی برای این عزیزان قائلم، ناشرها و نامزدها هم عم…
امروز مراسم اهدای جایزهی ابوالحسن نجفی برگزار شد و باز هم «همان همیشگی» اتفاق افتاد! عصری، پیش از مراسم، از هوشواره خواستم جدولی از نامزدها و برندههای این سالها بکشد و بر اساس ناشر مرتبش کند. همانطور که میبینید، قابل حدس بود چه اتفاقی میافتد، و بله، کتاب دیگری از بیدگل برندهی جایزه شد! یکبارگی اسم این جایزه را بگذارید «جایزهی ابوالحسن بیدگلی» و خودتان را راحت کنید دیگر! البته، «جایزهی ابوالحسن برجی» و «ابوا…
«غیژ» و «غیژغیژ» نامآوا (Onomatopoeia) هستند و صدای کشیده شدن چیزی روی چیزی یا روی زمین و نیز صدای بسته شدن در را تداعی میکنند.
هیچیک از این کلمات در فرهنگ املایی خط فارسی و دستور خط فارسی مضبوط نیست، اما باید دانست املای آنها آنطور که در بالا نوشته شده درست است.
۲۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
حسین جاوید
@Virastaar
من این کتاب را پیشتر ندیده بودم و حالا هر چه نگاه میکنم، باورم نمیشود که کتاب زندگی و آثار علی نصیریان را با اسم آقای هالو چاپ کردهاند و تصویر ایشان را هم گذاشتهاند روی جلد!
۲۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
حسین جاوید
@Virastaar
این «گرید A» و «گرید B» چیست که باب شده روی بستهبندی تخممرغ و برخی کالاهای دیگر مینویسند؟ «درجهیک» و «درجهدو» را دهها سال به همین معانی به کار بردهایم دیگر. اگر هم نگران ایناند که کسی جنس «درجهدو» نخرد، نگرانیشان بیهوده است؛ الحمدلله موفق شدهاند کاری کنند مردم بر اساس قیمت خرید کنند، نه کیفیت.
۱۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
حسین جاوید
@Virastaar
به یاد سه بزرگمرد ایران
این روزها، جامعهی کوهنوردی دنیا مبهوت و سوگوار حادثهی تلخ سقوط بهمن در برودپیک پاکستان است. طی این تراژدی، نیرمال پورجا، کوهنورد افسانهای، و نه نفر از اعضای برجستهی گروهش جان خود را از دست دادند. در ساعات اولیهی حادثه، امکانات دولت و ارتش نپال، ارتش پاکستان و انجمنهای کوهنوردی برای نجات جان آنها بسیج شد؛ گو اینکه بیحاصل بود، اما پیکرها را یافتند و به شهر اسکاردو انتقال دادند.
من …
سمت راستی نوعی پارچهی کتان است و نامش «لینن» است.
سمت چپی رهبر اتحاد جماهیر شوروی بود و نامش «لنین» است.
به همین سادگی!
اشتباه گرفتن این دو معمولاً در نوشتار رخ میدهد.
۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
حسین جاوید
@Virastaar
شهر پر شده از این آگهیهای پرغلط اسنپ! عامدانه واژهها و فاصلهها را به هم ریختهاند تا توجه جلب کنند!
بماند که این نوشتهها چقدر تمرکز رانندهها را مختل میکند و چه تصادفاتی پیش میآورد؛ اما در جریان باشید اینها با مجوز وزارت ارشاد اصطلاحاً «اکران» شدهاند و یکی از وظایف این وزارتخانه پاسداری از خط و زبان فارسی است!
۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
حسین جاوید
@Virastaar
وبینار «گنجواژۀ فارسی»
📆 چهارشنبه، ۳۱ تیر ۱۴۰۵، ساعت ۱۸
👨🏻💼 مهمان:
بهروز صفرزاده
👨🏻💼تسهیلگر گفتوگو:
معین پایدار
یکی از کاربردهای پنهان گنجنامهها گسترش دایرۀ لغات است، آن هم بهصورت علمی و شبکهای و سازمانیافته. همچنین در انتخاب هرچه دقیقترِ واژههای موجود و پیشگیری از بیدقتیهای نویسنده در سبک و لحن و سیاق، گنجنامهها کارآمدترین ابزار کمککار نویسندهاند.
در این وبینار، بهروز صفرزاده دربار «گنجواژۀ فار…
❤21👌4👍2
Signed Hossein Javid
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @virastaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@virastaar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@virastaar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@virstaar named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
باشگاه ادبیات @BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,147 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
Mohsen Namjoo | محسن نامجو @Official_MohsenNamjoo · 45,185 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
آنها @anhaaparat · 64,153 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Aasoo - آسو @NashrAasoo · 29,408 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
@litera999کتابخانهوموزه @litera999 · 74,314 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
سهند ایرانمهر @sahandiranmehr · 38,426 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 42,861 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,560 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
هزار داستان با مسعود بهنود @hezardastanbehnood · 44,484 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
نویسندگی @ErnestMillerHemingway · 29,487 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی @zistboommedia · 32,156 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei @drsargolzaei · 35,962 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
جامعهشناسی @iransociology · 37,531 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
خانهی شجریان | Shajarian Home @shajarian_home · 63,990 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
آن؛ @monadchannel · 52,326 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
تاریخاندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی @tarikhandishi · 111,752 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ویراستار” (@virastaar), 10,264 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virastaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.