Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ویراستار

Channel

ویراستار

@virastaar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,264subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001040404953
TypeChannel
Username@virastaar
Created10 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/virastaar

Growth

10,22610,26410,2455 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,227 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,228 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,230 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,233 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,240 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,245 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,247 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,249 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,250 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,247 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,257 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,261 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,259 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,263 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,262 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,264 subscribers5 August 202610 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 35 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,220–10,270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:4110,264+2
6 Sept 2026, 22:4010,262-1
4 Sept 2026, 07:3610,263+4
2 Sept 2026, 21:4610,259-2
1 Sept 2026, 18:4610,261+4
31 Aug 2026, 17:2610,257+4
30 Aug 2026, 14:1310,253+6
29 Aug 2026, 12:0310,247-3
28 Aug 2026, 11:0310,250+1
27 Aug 2026, 09:2610,249+2
25 Aug 2026, 10:0310,247-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:3210,248+3
20 Aug 2026, 09:5310,245+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:3510,244+4
18 Aug 2026, 10:4810,240+4
17 Aug 2026, 13:0510,236-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:1410,237+4
14 Aug 2026, 15:3710,233-3
13 Aug 2026, 03:3810,236+6
12 Aug 2026, 03:0810,230first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 10,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held25 (9 June 202625 August 2026)
Views total15,370
Reactions total641
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,476 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,16647.1%
60724.5%
😁35814.5%
🤔1897.63%
😢983.96%
👌582.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @virastaar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,800 views149 reactionsread 29 August 2026

با توجه به رواج روزافزون بهره‌گیری از هوشواره‌های گوناگون در تألیف و ترجمه‌ی کتاب‌ها، به نظر می‌رسد نیاز است ناشرها بندی از این قرار به قراردادهایشان بیفزایند: «پدیدآور تعهد می‌دهد هر گونه استفاده‌ی تعیین‌کننده و غیرمتعارف از هوش مصنوعی را به اطلاع ناشر برساند.» قرار نیست به جنگ آسیاب‌های بادی برویم، ولی قطعاً باید روشن باشد که نقش پدیدآور در نوشتن یا برگرداندن اثر چیست و چه بخش از کار را عامل انسانی و چه بخش از آن

👍10828😁9🤔3😢1

Signed Hossein Javid

23 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC≈2,440 views159 reactionsread 29 August 2026

یک پرسش مهم: در میان نامزدها، سه کتاب بوده‌اند که از زبان‌های ایتالیایی، آلمانی و ترکی استانبولی ترجمه شده‌اند. هیچ‌یک از اعضای محترم هیئت داوران این جایزه هیچ‌یک از این سه زبان را نمی‌داند! پس چطور فهمیده‌اند که ترجمه‌ی این آثار خوب است یا بد؟ با کمک هوش مصنوعی؟ مگر می‌شود دور هم جمع شوی که به ترجمه‌ی کتابی جایزه بدهی اما حتی زبان اصلی آن را ندانی؟ من احترام خیلی زیادی برای این عزیزان قائلم، ناشرها و نامزدها هم عم

👍130🤔138😁7😢1

Signed Hossein Javid

22 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈2,670 views88 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

امروز مراسم اهدای جایزه‌ی ابوالحسن نجفی برگزار شد و باز هم «همان همیشگی» اتفاق افتاد! عصری، پیش از مراسم، از هوشواره خواستم جدولی از نامزدها و برنده‌های این سال‌ها بکشد و بر اساس ناشر مرتبش کند. همان‌طور که می‌بینید، قابل حدس بود چه اتفاقی می‌افتد، ‌و بله، کتاب دیگری از بیدگل برنده‌ی جایزه شد! یکبارگی اسم این جایزه را بگذارید «جایزه‌ی ابوالحسن بیدگلی» و خودتان را راحت کنید دیگر! البته، «جایزه‌ی ابوالحسن برجی» و «ابوا

🤔39😁22👍189

Signed Hossein Javid

18 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,360 views101 reactionsread 29 August 2026

«غیژ» و «غیژغیژ» نام‌آوا (Onomatopoeia) هستند و صدای کشیده شدن چیزی روی چیزی یا روی زمین و نیز صدای بسته شدن در را تداعی می‌کنند. هیچ‌یک از این کلمات در فرهنگ املایی خط فارسی و دستور خط فارسی مضبوط نیست، اما باید دانست املای آن‌ها آن‌طور که در بالا نوشته شده درست است. ۲۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ حسین جاوید @Virastaar

👍6828😁3🤔2

Signed Hossein Javid

13 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈5,100 views144 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

من این کتاب را پیش‌تر ندیده بودم و حالا هر چه نگاه می‌کنم، باورم نمی‌شود که کتاب زندگی و آثار علی نصیریان را با اسم آقای هالو چاپ کرده‌‌اند و تصویر ایشان را هم گذاشته‌اند روی جلد! ۲۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ حسین جاوید @Virastaar

🤔77😁38😢236

Signed Hossein Javid

5 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC≈6,150 views230 reactionsread 29 August 2026

این «گرید A» و «گرید B» چیست که باب شده روی بسته‌‌‌بندی تخم‌مرغ و برخی کالاهای دیگر می‌نویسند؟ «درجه‌یک» و «درجه‌‌دو» را ده‌ها سال به همین معانی به کار برده‌ایم‌ دیگر. اگر‌ هم نگران این‌اند که کسی جنس «درجه‌دو» نخرد، نگرانی‌شان بیهوده است؛ الحمدلله موفق شده‌اند کاری کنند مردم بر اساس قیمت خرید کنند، نه کیفیت. ۱۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ حسین جاوید @Virastaar

👍177👌2418😢9😁2

Signed Hossein Javid

3 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC≈5,930 views195 reactionsread 29 August 2026

به یاد سه بزرگمرد ایران این روزها، جامعه‌ی کوه‌نوردی دنیا مبهوت و سوگوار حادثه‌ی تلخ سقوط بهمن در برودپیک پاکستان است. طی این تراژدی، نیرمال پورجا، کوه‌نورد افسانه‌ای، و نه نفر از اعضای برجسته‌ی گروهش جان خود را از دست دادند. در ساعات اولیه‌ی حادثه، امکانات دولت و ارتش نپال، ارتش پاکستان و انجمن‌های کوه‌نوردی برای نجات جان آن‌ها بسیج شد؛ گو اینکه بی‌حاصل بود، اما پیکرها را یافتند و به شهر اسکاردو انتقال دادند. من

134😢41👍17🤔3

Signed Hossein Javid

3 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈4,700 views184 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

سمت راستی نوعی پارچه‌ی کتان است و نامش «لینن» است. سمت چپی رهبر اتحاد جماهیر شوروی بود و نامش «لنین» است. به همین سادگی! اشتباه گرفتن این دو معمولاً در نوشتار رخ می‌دهد. ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ حسین جاوید @Virastaar

😁130👍438😢2👌1

Signed Hossein Javid

29 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC≈6,110 views169 reactionsread 29 August 2026

این «دیس کردن» معشوق در ترانه‌ها یک اصطلاح فارسی خیلی قشنگ با قدمت چند صد سال دارد: «واسوخت.» ۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ حسین جاوید @Virastaar

👍10242😁11🤔9👌5

Signed Hossein Javid

24 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC≈15,400 views219 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

شهر پر شده از این آگهی‌های پرغلط اسنپ! عامدانه واژه‌ها و فاصله‌ها‌ را به هم ریخته‌اند تا توجه جلب کنند! بماند که این نوشته‌ها چقدر تمرکز راننده‌ها‌ را مختل می‌کند و چه تصادفاتی پیش می‌آورد؛ اما در جریان باشید این‌ها با مجوز وزارت ارشاد اصطلاحاً «اکران» شده‌اند و یکی از وظایف این وزارتخانه پاسداری از خط و زبان فارسی است! ۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ حسین جاوید @Virastaar

👍161🤔24😢2010😁4

Signed Hossein Javid

20 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC≈5,860 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @sadepubPhoto

فردا در برنامه‌ی «عصر سه‌شنبه‌های بخارا» چشم‌به‌راهتان هستیم تا از کتاب گنج‌واژهٔ فارسی سخن بگوییم. @SadePub

38😁1

Signed Hossein Javid

19 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC≈5,360 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @yaademyPhoto

وبینار «گنج‌واژۀ فارسی» 📆 چهارشنبه، ۳۱ تیر ۱۴۰۵، ساعت ۱۸ 👨🏻‍💼 مهمان: بهروز صفرزاده 👨🏻‍💼تسهیلگر گفت‌وگو: معین پایدار یکی از کاربردهای پنهان گنج‌نامه‌ها گسترش دایرۀ لغات است، آن هم به‌صورت علمی و شبکه‌ای و سازمان‌یافته. همچنین در انتخاب هرچه دقیق‌ترِ واژه‌های موجود و پیش‌گیری از بی‌دقتی‌های نویسنده در سبک و لحن و سیاق، گنج‌نامه‌ها کارآمدترین ابزار کمک‌کار نویسنده‌اند. در این وبینار، بهروز صفرزاده دربار «گنج‌واژۀ فار

21👌4👍2

Signed Hossein Javid

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @virastaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@virastaar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

باشگاه ادبیات
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,147
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
Mohsen Namjoo | محسن نامجو
@Official_MohsenNamjoo · 45,185
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
آن‌ها
@anhaaparat · 64,153
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Aasoo - آسو
@NashrAasoo · 29,408
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
@litera999کتابخانه‌وموزه
@litera999 · 74,314
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
سهند ایرانمهر
@sahandiranmehr · 38,426
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى
@tarjomaanweb · 42,861
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
شفیعی کدکنی
@shafiei_kadkani · 44,560
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
هزار داستان با مسعود بهنود
@hezardastanbehnood · 44,484
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
نویسندگی
@ErnestMillerHemingway · 29,487
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,156
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei
@drsargolzaei · 35,962
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
جامعه‌شناسی
@iransociology · 37,531
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
خانه‌ی شجریان | Shajarian Home
@shajarian_home · 63,990
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
آن؛
@monadchannel · 52,326
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
تاریخ‌اندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی
@tarikhandishi · 111,752
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ویراستار” (@virastaar), 10,264 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virastaar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.