Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки на западном дворе || Михаил Вистгоф

Channel

Записки на западном дворе || Михаил Вистгоф

@vistgof_m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001927991729
TypeChannel
Username@vistgof_m
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vistgof_m

Growth

6365646 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers29 August 2026 — 64 subscribers8 September 2026 — 65 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 33 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 07:4065+1
29 Aug 2026, 05:3464+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:1663no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:3463first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4333.1%
🔥1813.8%
🤡1511.5%
💩107.69%
🥰107.69%
🤮96.92%
👍86.15%
😁86.15%
💯32.31%
❤‍🔥21.54%
🎉10.769%
🏆10.769%
👎10.769%
👏10.769%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssvetloooo

*** Как выпал снег, так пишется о снеге. Так часто о любимом человеке не говорят, как говорят о снеге. А за окном такая благодать, что страшно слово лишнее сказать: мальчишки увязают, и собаки не могут пухлый двор перебежать. И строки эти вязнут на бумаге. И страшно слово лишнее сказать. Юрий Казарин

🔥3👍1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

9 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

*** Чертово колесо. Сентябрь. Исписанная стена Облако сжалось в сером гнезде района Бесконечный Строгинский парк. Бесконечно отражена В черной реке рожь фонарей на склонах Двухколесные светлячки выезжают из темноты Чтобы спустя секунду тихо пропасть в лесу Хищно глядит сквозь хилые обескровленные листы Небо, как черный бык с лунным кольцом в носу

🔥4

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

8 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC34 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мои стихи в новом "Альдебаране" (с. 17 - 23). Спасибо Марине Марьяшиной. Поэтическое зрение Михаила Вистгофа цепляется за, казалось бы, самые устойчивые детали урбанистического пейзажа и делает их неустойчивыми. Торговые центры, городская иллюминация, оголённые деревья и провода, скейтпарк, кафе и веранды в его речи вдруг будто отрываются от земли, превращаются в голограмму или перетасовываются, как цветные стёклышк

❤‍🔥2🎉1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

3 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC43 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mempoetryVideo

СКК, когда увидел в новой "Артикуляции" шесть рецензий на свои книги и подборку своих нетленок предложка

4

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

31 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @falanster_books

Михаил Вистгоф. Многоточие мотыльков: стихотворения. Издательство «ЛитГОСТ». 529 руб. В дебютной книге Михаила Вистгофа представлены стихи 2023—2026 годов. Это герметичные, отчасти строгие, но предельно зримые тексты, соединяющие традиции высокого модернизма с мироощущением сегодняшнего дня. По словам Валерия Шубинского, «Вистгоф одновременно строг (не сентиментален) и смел. Он говорит зрением, говорит о себе через

5🏆1👍1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

26 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Да, неделя меланхолично-самокопательных постов

1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

26 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC102 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Думаю, самое важное, что мне дал оконченный почти месяц назад Литинститут — некое ощущение внутренней самостоятельности. Помню, как в возрасте 18 - 20 лет мне казалось, что все слова критиков и других поэтов (особенно старших и статусных) относительно моих текстов — это правда. Что критики, мастера и старшие поэты видят меня лучше, чем вижу себя я сам. Я смотрел им в рот, в надежде получить одобрение. Сейчас я пон

5👏1😁1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

25 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC85 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ТОЛКОВАЛИ О РУССКОЙ ПОЭЗИИ ВИСТГОФ И МКРТЧЯН Поскольку доказать распространенное подозрение на ИИшный текст я не могу, будем исходить из того, что статью написал сам коллега Мкртчян (презумпция, так сказать, невиновности). Но даже в этом случае, у полемической статьи Мкртчяна есть несколько существенных проблем: 1. Автор пытается представить оппонента (ну, то есть, меня) консерватором от мира литературы, и даже наз

5🔥4👍3

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

24 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC71 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Странное ощущение, конечно. Я вроде бы овладел неким стихотворным инструментарием, выстроил лирический макрокосм, был много где напечатан, замечен, выпустил сборник. И после этого пришло понимание, что так писать больше нельзя, нужно трансформировать свой мир, нужно становится другим (но при этом, не совсем другим: важно оставаться Мишей Вистгофом). А как это сделать - никто не знает. Мне кажется, поэт после выпуска

🥰5💯3👍1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

23 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC113 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥳🍷🥰 Дорогие друзья! У меня вышел дебютный сборник стихотворений, "Многоточие мотыльков". В него вошли стихи 2023 - 2026 годов. Желающие приобрести — пишите в личку! Лучше ВК, к телеграмму не всегда стабильный доступ. Тем, кто хочет написать на книгу рецензию я готов выслать PDF. Благодарю всех причастных к изданию: Главного редактора издательства ЛитГОСТ — Владимира Коркунова Корректора — Дарию Солдо Дизайнера о

11🔥5🥰3👎1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

19 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC174 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Самая профессиональная, взрослая, взвешенная реакция на критику - это придти вместе с кентами в тгк критику, поставить ему блевы, клоунов и говняшки)

🤡5😁1

Signed Михаил Вистгоф

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vistgof_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Насчёт последней заметки о С.К.К.

  1. Согласен с мыслями и стилем текста24%
  2. Согласен с мыслями, но не согласен с интонацией48%
  3. Кудрин норм поэт, а ты не шаришь24%
  4. Об этом не надо писать, чтобы не рекламировать лишний раз14%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки на западном дворе || Михаил Вистгоф” (@vistgof_m), 65 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vistgof_m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.