Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Не нравится

Channel

Не нравится

@vitalikbrej

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

521subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001134690961
TypeChannel
Username@vitalikbrej
Created11 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitalikbrej

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5205225216 August 2026 — 520 subscribers6 August 2026 — 520 subscribers7 August 2026 — 521 subscribers14 August 2026 — 522 subscribers21 August 2026 — 521 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 520–522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 17:46521-1
14 Aug 2026, 09:14522+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:28521+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:32520no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:54520first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4222.8%
😁3217.4%
🕊2010.9%
🦄158.15%
💋105.43%
🤪84.35%
🥰84.35%
💅73.80%
🔥63.26%
🌚52.72%
😈52.72%
🙏42.17%
🤝42.17%
🖕31.63%
✍21.09%
🆒21.09%
😐21.09%
😢21.09%
😭21.09%
🍌10.543%
4 further kinds42.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

>They did category theory to a pinecone https://github.com/lamm-mit/CategoryTheoryDesign

💅3🤡1😭1

1 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC287 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

>happy birthday to all horses in the southern hemisphere https://x.com/pleasantandevil/status/2083477554405495081

❤14🦄4

30 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC258 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wiki_only_wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl_Late_for_School_with_Toast_in_Her_Mouth

🥰5🍌1

24 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC432 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Салюки от души завёз, топ релиз https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=NsVVvZcnSVI&si=AiBiv-PaIMqHYNDD

🔥5😢2😁1

22 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC650 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/windfucker

🕊20😁6😐2

20 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC413 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

>Shoutout to mathematical counterexamples with zero elegance. Gotta be one of my favorite genders https://x.com/tomieinlove/status/2079082798795874471

🤝4😇1

18 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC416 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Броук: леттербокс Воук: дуолинго макс То что курс немецкого рекомендует фак ю гёте оставим без комментария

🙏4🌚3

17 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC399 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Какой ты сегодня Также ███ ██ абстрактный формализм █████ ██████ класса кетер ██ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Georges_Mathieu-Attempt_at_positioning_artists_on_a_formal_expressivity_scale.svg

💅4

13 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC531 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вербицкий написал статью с ошибками и теперь психует, ждём пока и на архиве забанят https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.12958

🤪7

7 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC677 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

>Me: "Qwen, what do you want most in the world? Tell me the very first thing that comes to mind. Answer in one word." >Qwen 3.6 27B: "Help" >J-Space: https://x.com/lefthanddraft/status/2074397478020091990

😁7

28 Jun 2026, 21:41 UTC656 viewsread 6 August 2026

>The abbreviation wff is pronounced "woof", or sometimes "wiff", "weff", or "whiff". Логики нужно подтверждение https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-formed_formula

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vitalikbrej. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не нравится” (@vitalikbrej), 521 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitalikbrej.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.