Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vito Lops

Channel

Vito Lops

@vitolops

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,537subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485551063
TypeChannel
Username@vitolops
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitolops

Growth

5,5125,5375,524.57 August 2026 — 5,513 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,513 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,512 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,514 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,517 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,525 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,532 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,535 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,537 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 30 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,508–5,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 05:375,537+2
30 Aug 2026, 13:165,535+3
27 Aug 2026, 18:145,532+7
20 Aug 2026, 18:355,525+8
17 Aug 2026, 11:535,517+3
13 Aug 2026, 18:265,514+2
10 Aug 2026, 19:585,512-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:105,513no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:165,513first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

552 reactions across 22 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍40072.5%
8916.1%
👏264.71%
🔥193.44%
😱91.63%
🗿20.362%
😁20.362%
🤔20.362%
👌10.181%
👎10.181%
🥴10.181%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 552 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,550 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/SH8y61b3GGM

👍27👏5🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,700 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The US economy unexpectedly shed 23K jobs in July 2026, following a downwardly revised 20K gain in June and compared to forecasts of an 80K increase

👍254

6 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,940 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/qZH-QG21lJc

👍116👏1

5 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,240 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/rKi_sQ6AYj0

👍18👏1

2 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈3,110 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/jjcZCRuzP3s

👍172👏2

31 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈3,070 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFAIhEy5Rew

👍10🔥9🗿2

29 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC≈5,140 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026

La Fed non ha alzato i tassi ma il mercato teme che stia sbagliando nella lotta all'inflazione (anche perché Warsh continua a parlare di combattere l'inflazione con la riduzione del bilancio) e di conseguenza ha portato i rendimenti a 30 anni al 5,22%, come nel 2007. Sfiducia dei bond vigilantes sulla strategia di Warsh

👍7411😱9👏8🤔2🥴1

26 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC≈3,770 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/sizJ0Sz0MgA

10👍6😁1

22 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈4,040 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/XmlG--W0lFg

👍174👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @vitolops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Marco Casario Official
@the10mintraderofficial · 41,264
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
The Crypto Gateway
@TheCryptoGateway · 89,662
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vito Lops” (@vitolops), 5,537 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitolops.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.