Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vivian

Channel

vivian

@vivian_btc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

457subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232000146
TypeChannel
Username@vivian_btc
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vivian_btc

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

457464460.57 August 2026 — 464 subscribers8 August 2026 — 464 subscribers15 August 2026 — 463 subscribers23 August 2026 — 462 subscribers31 August 2026 — 459 subscribers9 September 2026 — 457 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 456–465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:15457-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:13459-3
23 Aug 2026, 18:54462-1
15 Aug 2026, 05:06463-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:48464no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:56464first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026

Blockchainedbb 2026-07-21 20:06: I'm out of all long positions on $BTC and sidelined. I wouldn't short until we see a solid breakdown below 65522. This level was previous resistance, so unless there's a breakout, I wouldn't go long again this week. The retracement on the chart is invalid only if we see a daily candle above 68k. Happy Tuesday! Blockchainedbb 回复: As you can see on the chart, 61777 is a hard stop for s

29 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tired of guessing tops and bottoms? We post live signals, real trade breakdowns, and a community that calls out the mistakes before you make them. TRADE SMART. SNIPE HARD. 🐂🐻 #CryptoTrading #Bitcoin #CryptoSignals ------------------------------- 厌倦了盲目猜测行情的顶部和底部? 我们实时发布交易信号,提供真实的交易拆解,还有社群在你犯错前及时指出问题。 聪明交易,精准狙击。 🐂🐻 #CryptoTrading #Bitcoin #CryptoSignals

1

28 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC60 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Easy cash was felt from a distance ❤️ ------------------------------- 轻松获利,远在天边便已感知 ❤️

28 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We worked exactly 3 mins today btw 🤣 ------------------------------- 我们今天实际上就忙了3分钟,🤣

27 Jul 2026, 23:06 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Boring ass day. Second level of shorts on $BTC completed. We shall short level 3 of shorts tomorrow morning! Night Night! ------------------------------- 无聊透顶的一天。$BTC 的第二层做空已完成。我们明天上午将进行第三层做空!晚安啦!

26 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Posted the entry. Members posted these. That's the whole tweet. Watch the video. 📸 TRADE SMART. SNIPE HARD. 🎯 #Crypto #Altcoins #BTC ------------------------------- 发布了内容。会员们发布了这些。 这就是整条推文。观看视频。📸 明智交易。精准狙击。🎯 # 加密币 #山寨币 #BTC

24 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026

Blockchainedbb 2026-07-24 00:38: Current shorts would be closed at 63888; 64-61 is another leg. After this flush, we will wait for the first LTF structure shift before taking a long position again. The order book indicates the entire move is triggered by liquidation, not new shorts. So I'm expecting an alt season, if at all. Let the shorts run. Blockchainedbb 回复: Target completed! Out of level 1shorts! We shall shor

24 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC63 viewsread 8 August 2026

MarioTiger88 2026-07-24 21:55: @blockchainedbb Entry long 62k? 🫣 Blockchainedbb 回复: Let it find its footing near 60-62k, stay there, and break structure on LTF, then decline afterward. I'd assume there’s one more move down before we go long. ------------------------------- 让它在6万至6.2万附近站稳,维持在该区间,并在短周期图表(LTF)上打破结构,随后再回落。我推测,在我们进场做多之前,还会有一波下行走势。

24 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC53 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Level 1 target on $BTC approaching! ------------------------------- #$BTC# 第一目标位正在逼近!🚀

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vivian_btc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vivian” (@vivian_btc), 457 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vivian_btc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.