Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VJLink

Channel

VJLink

@vjchnl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,630subscribers

+622 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448115874
TypeChannel
Username@vjchnl
Created13 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vjchnl

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,00844,16133,584.56 August 2026 — 23,008 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,008 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,018 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,040 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,050 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,056 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,058 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,051 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,056 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,161 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,706 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,337 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,169 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,167 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,187 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,219 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,228 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,239 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,244 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,268 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,272 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,274 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,311 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,331 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,342 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,362 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,405 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,455 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,454 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,439 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,474 subscribers18 September 2026 — 23,481 subscribers29 September 2026 — 23,594 subscribers5 October 2026 — 23,629 subscribers9 October 2026 — 23,620 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,610 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,614 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,625 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,624 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,612 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,614 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,618 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,621 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,624 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,640 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,647 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,652 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,630 subscribers23,6306 August 202626 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 81 days, net +622. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,835–47,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 21:3823,630-22
25 Oct 2026, 21:4923,652+5
25 Oct 2026, 00:3023,647+7
24 Oct 2026, 03:0723,640+16
21 Oct 2026, 23:1123,624+3
20 Oct 2026, 15:4923,621+3
19 Oct 2026, 19:0723,618+4
18 Oct 2026, 21:5523,614+2
17 Oct 2026, 20:1023,612-12
16 Oct 2026, 17:1023,624-1
15 Oct 2026, 20:1723,625+11
14 Oct 2026, 20:1723,614+4
13 Oct 2026, 14:2723,610-10
9 Oct 2026, 19:2123,620-9
5 Oct 2026, 13:1623,629+35
29 Sept 2026, 17:3723,594+113
18 Sept 2026, 03:1623,481+7
15 Sept 2026, 21:1923,474+35
14 Sept 2026, 05:2023,439-15
12 Sept 2026, 11:5623,454first reading

Engagement

244 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 23,630 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,520
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 244 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held244 (29 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total833,373
Reactions total14,541
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 29s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,834 reactions across 244 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣6,90223.9%
😁5,29718.4%
❤2,5048.68%
👍1,5065.22%
🙈1,4214.93%
🙉1,3484.68%
🥱9953.45%
😢7522.61%
🕊6962.41%
😭6732.33%
💯6592.29%
🔥5021.74%
🙊4671.62%
🥴4471.55%
❤‍🔥3701.28%
🫡3381.17%
💅2880.999%
🍾2660.923%
👏2610.905%
🥰2460.853%
45 further kinds2,89610.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 244 of the 244 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,834 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18,580
across the posts below
Posts paid on
81
of 244 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
2,200
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vjchnl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 244 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,000 views12 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥴5👍4❤2🔥1

24 Oct 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,240 views16 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍8❤5🦄3

24 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,810 views32 reactionsread 24 October 2026

ппц калыч храпит

😁27🙈4🙉1

24 Oct 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,050 views42 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤15😁15🦄8💅3🍾1

23 Oct 2026, 22:48 UTC≈3,540 views48 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Что интересного у вас

🥱41🤔5👻2

23 Oct 2026, 19:44 UTC≈5,640 views242 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Красивый?

❤123🤣75🙉19🍓8🥴4🦄4❤‍🔥3👍3

23 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈4,380 views36 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥴22❤10🍓3🤪1

23 Oct 2026, 02:19 UTC≈5,190 views106 reactions204 Starsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤓67😁18👍9❤‍🔥4🙉3💘2🍓1💋1

22 Oct 2026, 22:54 UTC≈5,460 views111 reactions2,200 Starsread 24 October 2026

https://youtu.be/njRnrnZeYAc?si=J_Iz7bfefPEMBaax данный клип

❤71🔥18👍9🙈5🥱4❤‍🔥2🤔1😐1

22 Oct 2026, 21:20 UTC≈5,030 views53 reactions312 Starsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣34❤10🔥3😁3🍓2😈1

22 Oct 2026, 21:13 UTC≈4,940 views64 reactions272 Starsread 24 October 2026

Создали канал Сане, выкатили пока экстренный прогноз на сегодняшние ночные матчи. Подписку не ленимся оформляем это бесплатно, пока. https://youtu.be/4dxIOw5VLtw?si=bdoL79J4m6PJRL--

🤣50👍5❤2❤‍🔥2🍓2🤯1😁1😈1

22 Oct 2026, 10:21 UTC≈5,420 views165 reactions234 Starsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Яше и Губи сделали фан арт

❤123👍13🔥10🌚4🤗3🥱3🥴3🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 244 posts we hold for @vjchnl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTCAnonymous Poll2,320 voters approx.

Вы очень голодны и у вас есть совсем немного адены чтобы пойти сделать зоказик, что выберете?

  1. Вьетнамскач кухня11%
  2. Шаумра46%
  3. Нищ бургер9%
  4. Бич ужин в столовке24%
  5. Доесть за кем нибудь и депнуть24%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ШТРЭБУХ
@Shtrebuh · 32,676
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VJLink” (@vjchnl), 23,630 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vjchnl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.