Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VK Знакомства

Channel

VK Знакомства

@vk_dating

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

133,005subscribers

-34,166 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237736753
TypeChannel
Username@vk_dating
DescriptionМесто неслучайных встреч 💘 https://vkdating-app.ru/install/ 👈🏼 Установить VK Знакомства на iOS https://trk.mail.ru/c/txr1r5 👈🏼 Начать пользоваться сервисом https://t.me/boost/vk_dating 👈🏼 Поддержать канал бустом
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vk_dating

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

133,005167,171150,0887 August 2026 — 167,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 167,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 166,894 subscribers9 August 2026 — 166,625 subscribers10 August 2026 — 166,404 subscribers11 August 2026 — 166,056 subscribers12 August 2026 — 165,604 subscribers13 August 2026 — 165,215 subscribers14 August 2026 — 164,395 subscribers16 August 2026 — 161,320 subscribers17 August 2026 — 157,779 subscribers18 August 2026 — 157,113 subscribers19 August 2026 — 156,444 subscribers20 August 2026 — 156,031 subscribers21 August 2026 — 155,686 subscribers23 August 2026 — 155,888 subscribers24 August 2026 — 155,207 subscribers25 August 2026 — 154,859 subscribers26 August 2026 — 154,474 subscribers27 August 2026 — 154,225 subscribers28 August 2026 — 153,883 subscribers29 August 2026 — 153,589 subscribers30 August 2026 — 153,312 subscribers31 August 2026 — 152,765 subscribers1 September 2026 — 152,457 subscribers2 September 2026 — 150,478 subscribers4 September 2026 — 150,213 subscribers7 September 2026 — 149,406 subscribers10 September 2026 — 148,250 subscribers12 September 2026 — 147,660 subscribers14 September 2026 — 147,310 subscribers15 September 2026 — 146,783 subscribers18 September 2026 — 145,936 subscribers29 September 2026 — 142,002 subscribers5 October 2026 — 140,321 subscribers9 October 2026 — 138,533 subscribers13 October 2026 — 137,704 subscribers14 October 2026 — 137,508 subscribers16 October 2026 — 137,329 subscribers17 October 2026 — 136,974 subscribers18 October 2026 — 136,870 subscribers19 October 2026 — 136,246 subscribers20 October 2026 — 135,808 subscribers21 October 2026 — 135,582 subscribers22 October 2026 — 135,162 subscribers23 October 2026 — 134,949 subscribers24 October 2026 — 134,370 subscribers25 October 2026 — 134,107 subscribers26 October 2026 — 133,956 subscribers27 October 2026 — 133,776 subscribers28 October 2026 — 133,583 subscribers29 October 2026 — 133,418 subscribers30 October 2026 — 133,175 subscribers31 October 2026 — 133,005 subscribers7 August 202631 October 2026
54 measurements spanning 85 days, net -34,166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127,880–172,296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 20:26133,005-170
30 Oct 2026, 23:28133,175-243
29 Oct 2026, 21:39133,418-165
28 Oct 2026, 20:09133,583-193
27 Oct 2026, 19:09133,776-180
26 Oct 2026, 19:38133,956-151
25 Oct 2026, 19:50134,107-263
24 Oct 2026, 18:47134,370-579
23 Oct 2026, 17:14134,949-213
22 Oct 2026, 13:37135,162-420
21 Oct 2026, 04:27135,582-226
20 Oct 2026, 03:01135,808-438
19 Oct 2026, 04:31136,246-624
18 Oct 2026, 01:47136,870-104
17 Oct 2026, 01:46136,974-355
16 Oct 2026, 02:07137,329-179
14 Oct 2026, 23:46137,508-196
13 Oct 2026, 18:11137,704-829
9 Oct 2026, 22:38138,533-1,788
5 Oct 2026, 13:38140,321first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.31%
avg views ÷ 133,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,730
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.342%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held84 (29 July 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total143,240
Reactions total490
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Nov 2026, 02:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,580
Videos
≈57
Links
≈373

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,375 reactions across 84 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤75631.8%
😁34214.4%
🤣31713.3%
🔥28311.9%
👍2329.77%
🗿1315.52%
💯954.00%
💘602.53%
🤔341.43%
😍311.31%
💋271.14%
🎉130.547%
🌚120.505%
👏110.463%
😱110.463%
🤩90.379%
💅70.295%
💔40.168%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2026, 15:17 UTC≈2,130 views15 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

Хорошие новости: можно больше не волноваться, куда пойти на первое свидание 😉 Мы запускаем проект «Места неслучайных встреч», где можно посмотреть локации в Москве и Санкт-Петербурге, в которых будет приятно увидеться. Места нам советовали сами пользователи, а мы отобрали лучшие и добавили их на карту. Каждое место отмечено также специальной наклейкой на дверях или витринах. На странице проекта вы увидите карту, а …

🔥7👍4❤2💘2

30 Oct 2026, 14:54 UTC≈2,040 views27 reactionsread 1 November 2026

Кажется, пару Андрюхе теперь ищет половина интернета! Мы тоже не смогли остаться в стороне 😉️️️️️️ Нашли газель, Андрюху и связались с ним. Подарили ему Премиум в VK Знакомствах на 3 месяца, чтобы шансы на тот самый мэтч стали ещё выше. И пригласили на наши быстрые свидания Где и когда они пройдут, расскажем совсем скоро. Следите за анонсом и приходите сами 💞

🔥11👍6😍6😁3💘1

30 Oct 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,900 views33 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Forwarded from @toporlivePhoto

В Мытищах запустили масштабную кампанию по поиску девушки для Андрюхи. Друзья парня арендовали тачку с баннером «Это Андрюха и он ищет девушку» и разместили на ней QR-код, ведущий на его анкету в ВК Знакомствах. Теперь у Андрюхи есть собственная наружная реклама. Ждём результатов. 👉 Топор Live. Подписаться

🤣13🔥12👍4❤3💘1

29 Oct 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,820 views15 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

После такого сообщения встречи не будет. Почти наверняка В карточках рассказываем, почему не стоит писать «давай как-нибудь увидимся» и чем заменить эту фразу «Надо бы» и «в обозримом будущем» это тоже касается ☝️

👍10👏2🗿2❤1

28 Oct 2026, 14:35 UTC≈3,750 views19 reactionsread 1 November 2026

Стадии дня: • 17:00 — может, напишу мэтчу? • 20:00 — ладно, завтра • 23:40 — а вдруг онлайн? • 23:41 — *сообщение отправлено*

🤣12💯7

27 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈4,710 views20 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁19❤1

26 Oct 2026, 16:47 UTC≈5,210 views14 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

Свидание идёт хорошо, но тут — ужас — новая тема не приходит в голову! Спокойно, тут главное — не паниковать. Держите несколько примеров того, что стоит и не стоит делать в такой ситуации 😉 Не грузятся фото или видео? Читайте нас в MAX

❤10🔥4

25 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,300 views18 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

В каждой компании есть друг или подруга, которые уверяют, что им никто и не нужен. Хотя все вокруг понимают, что это не так. Это лишь одна из типичных отговорок о поиске пары, а мы собрали ещё шесть. Если узнали в них кого-то из друзей или знакомых, срочно отправляйте им ссылку на VK Знакомства. Там и вас, и их будут ждать бесплатные Премиум-функции на 7 дней

🔥9👍5🗿2❤1😁1

24 Oct 2026, 15:04 UTC≈5,100 views37 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁22❤10👍2🔥2🗿1

24 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈5,100 views14 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

Как понять, что друзьям нужна ссылка на VK Знакомства? Ответ в нашем бинго! Если совпало 3 пункта, смело отправляйте ему или ей свою реферальную ссылку 💘 Если не совпало, тоже. Ведь в любом случае вы вместе получите бесплатные Премиум-функции.

👍6😁5🗿2🔥1

23 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC≈4,760 views18 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

В VK Знакомствах поиск тех самых становится ещё проще. Находить людей, которые с большей вероятностью будут вам близки, помогут расширенные фильтры поиска 💞 Указать желаемую цель знакомства, рост, знак зодиака и многие другие важные критерии можно с подключённым Премиумом

❤6🔥6😁3👍2👏1

22 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈5,060 views21 reactionsread 30 October 2026

Posted without readable text

😁14❤5🗿2

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @vk_dating. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@vk_dating edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTCAnonymous Poll338 voters

Вам прилетел суперлайк 💓 Первая мысль:

  1. Ага! Наверняка это всё моя третья фотка в креативной позе9%
  2. В метро трясло, у кого-то сорвался палец17%
  3. Скриню и кидаю в чат с друзьями4%
  4. Сразу ставлю взаимный лайк!13%
  5. Включаю режим разведчика и иду изучать анкету57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTCAnonymous Poll387 voters

Мэтч хочет узнать вашу совместимость. Что выберете?

  1. Окрошка на квасе 🫗57%
  2. Окрошка на кефире 🥛35%
  3. Отвечу в комментариях15%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VK Знакомства” (@vk_dating), 133,005 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vk_dating.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.