Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vlad007 🎱|TON/Rare&VIP Anonymous Numbers/Telegram Gifts

Channel

Vlad007 🎱|TON/Rare&VIP Anonymous Numbers/Telegram Gifts

@vlad007

5 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

232subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002155251990
TypeChannel
Usernames@aslam @blockhead @danisa @supra @vlad007
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vlad007

Growth

232237234.56 August 2026 — 235 subscribers6 August 2026 — 235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 236 subscribers7 August 2026 — 236 subscribers7 August 2026 — 236 subscribers8 August 2026 — 236 subscribers13 August 2026 — 234 subscribers13 August 2026 — 234 subscribers15 August 2026 — 233 subscribers15 August 2026 — 233 subscribers15 August 2026 — 233 subscribers20 August 2026 — 237 subscribers21 August 2026 — 235 subscribers27 August 2026 — 233 subscribers28 August 2026 — 234 subscribers29 August 2026 — 234 subscribers1 September 2026 — 234 subscribers6 September 2026 — 232 subscribers7 September 2026 — 232 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
20 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–238 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 01:19232no change
6 Sept 2026, 23:41232-2
1 Sept 2026, 00:08234no change
29 Aug 2026, 05:42234no change
28 Aug 2026, 14:36234+1
27 Aug 2026, 21:14233-2
21 Aug 2026, 13:37235-2
20 Aug 2026, 16:37237+4
15 Aug 2026, 20:44233no change
15 Aug 2026, 19:58233no change
15 Aug 2026, 15:44233-1
13 Aug 2026, 17:49234no change
13 Aug 2026, 07:04234-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:01236no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:50236no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:06236no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:56236+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:46235no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:46235no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:01235first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54520554256901233014135.7%
custom 54382493005617928143429.6%
custom 5312359316580216113119.57%
custom 5359388675895467568119.57%
custom 5350519289256355751108.70%
custom 535278496181440544054.35%
custom 535960164184884012832.61%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026

I've spent the past month thinking about this from every angle. And this is the conclusion I've reached. Don't play the game you wish existed. Play the game that actually exists. The more I observe people, companies, markets, and the way the world works, the more convinced I become of one simple idea. Most problems don't exist because a system is broken. They exist because people misunderstand how the system actuall

27 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC556 viewsread 8 August 2026

Everything in this life is an exchange. 💱 Time for money, money for time, goods, services, emotions. It's all built on that.

5 Jun 2026, 11:55 UTC839 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I rarely talk about the crypto market as a whole, but today I want to share some thoughts on Bitcoin 💰 . The current situation is extremely interesting, and I'm watching it closely. According to CryptoQuant, overall Bitcoin demand has fallen to its weakest level of the current cycle, with a decline of roughly 501,000 BTC. Around 272,000 BTC comes from the spot market and another 229,000 BTC from futures markets. Many

custom 545205542569012330117custom 54382493005617928142

27 Apr 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,060 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

@BOSS 4 hours ago, this username was purchased for 500 000 USDT. It will be more interesting later 🎂

custom 54520554256901233013custom 54382493005617928142custom 53505192892563557511

17 Apr 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,170 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I am sure that when the purchase of collectible numbers and usernames through USDT is implemented on Fragment, then simple collectible numbers will cost more than $10,000-$20,000. 💸📱👍 +888 0101 0202- 1 000 000 usdt +888 0303 3333- 1 000 000 usdt +888 0000 0103- 300 000 usdt @makita- 1 000 000 usdt @metabo- 1 000 000 usdt @ryobi- 500 000 usdt @supra- 100 000 usdt @hazet- 100 000 usdt If these assets are sold at the

custom 53593886758954675685custom 53505192892563557514custom 54520554256901233014

3 Apr 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,110 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/TGcollectors/122 🔥🔥🔥

custom 54382493005617928146custom 53123593165802161133custom 53505192892563557512custom 53596016418488401281

7 Mar 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,200 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

On sale: +888 0303 3333 +888 0101 0202 +888 0000 0103 +888 0304 3333 Very rare! They have never been on accounts or sold! +888 0055 3535 +888 0101 7171 +888 0202 9595 +888 0932 1646

custom 54382493005617928148custom 54520554256901233016custom 53527849618144054403

8 Feb 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,510 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The plan has been exceeded! For the 2nd month of 2026, the transaction for the username is more than $ 2,200,000. Unbelievably 💸

custom 53527849618144054402

7 Feb 2026, 16:07 UTC≈1,460 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Are you following this battle? @danbao Already more than: 2️⃣ 0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣💲

custom 53123593165802161138custom 54382493005617928141

6 Feb 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I'm really enjoying what's happening! 🤑 This is the crypt, this is the volatility on which millions of dollars are earned!👍

custom 54382493005617928146custom 53505192892563557513custom 54520554256901233012custom 53596016418488401281

30 Jan 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 8 August 2026

🩸 Blood. +888 And in anonymous numbers, everything is stable +- $2 500 My offers 👉 https://getgems.io/vlad007

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vlad007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vlad007 🎱|TON/Rare&VIP Anonymous Numbers/Telegram Gifts” (@vlad007), 232 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlad007.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.