Channel
@vladzelyzip
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,613subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001045186447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vladzelyzip |
| Created | 29 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vladzelyzip |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 3,613 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 3,617 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 3,619 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 3,622 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 3,623 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 3,627 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 3,629 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 3,631 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 3,629 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 3,632 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 3,632 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Не прошло и недели — американское правительство ограничило доступ для не-американцев(!) к новой модели Клода 5.0. Тут детали от анпропика: https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access Ссылка на проект европа2031 в посте выше.
Интересный фикшнл проект о рисках в будущем, связанных с неспособностью Европы угнаться за AI. https://europe2031.ai/
Photo, posted without a caption
https://intenseminimalism.com/2026/words-are-cheap-use-fewer/
Photo, posted without a caption
Output isn’t design Design keeps being misunderstood in our industry. New tools keep promising to generate interfaces faster, move words to product instantly, or collapse design directly into code. The assumption behind them is clear: that design is the act of producing. That is the misunderstanding. The hard part of design is rarely generating the form. It is understanding the problem well enough to know what and …
Photo, posted without a caption
"Design isn't waterfall, or the double diamond, or "iterate and test", or coding or comping or any of the dozens of processes ... Design is at its core the *intention* to improve material conditions under conditions of uncertainty based on understanding as much as you can about the context. Sometimes this is a competitive advantage, and sometimes it's not. (This is where so much "UX" talk goes wrong.)" Erika Hall sr…
Researchers at UW Allen School and Stanford just ran the largest study ever on AI creative diversity. 70+ AI models were given the same open-ended questions. They all gave the same answers. They asked over 70 different LLMs the exact same open-ended questions. "Write a poem about time." "Suggest startup ideas." "Give me life advice." Questions where there is no single right answer. Questions where 10 different hu…
Photo, posted without a caption
Интересный анализ орг структур и дизайн лидершипа/инфлюенса в тек компаниях. https://www.blixtdunder.com/design-leadership2026/
Многое SaaS компании жёстко страглят с превращением в AI компании. Intercom — одно из тех компаний, которая «шмагла». Тут их СЕО рассказывает: как. Линк
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vladzelyzip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vladzely.zip” (@vladzelyzip), 3,613 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladzelyzip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.