Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Vibecoding is so last year
@vlbecode
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003723108320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vlbecode |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vlbecode |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 99 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 95 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 89 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 88 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 86 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 86 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 24.3% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 21.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 16.2% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 13.5% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Урра! Они чинили это больше месяца
🎉1
Я наверно слоупок, потому что только сейчас, в августе 2026, открыл для себя создание ad-hoc расширений для Chrome прямо из Claude/Codex Desktop. Основное наклоденое расширение, которым пользуюсь с удовольствием, это дедупликация вкладок. Когда я открываю какую-то ссылку, а она уже где-то открыта, меня сразу перебрасывает туда без создания новой вкладки Это изумительно работает, когда у тебя пять окон Chrome, в каж…
🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤4😁2
Интересное исследование: https://alexzhang13.github.io/blog/2026/harness/ Утверждают, что Claude Code и Codex архитектурно тупиковые: они льют историю тулов в контекст, провоцируя context rot. Альтернатива: оркестратор, который вообще не видит данные
✍1
Устрашающие картинки от Дарио
🤩2😱1
Это я пробую в автоматическую генерацию дайджестов
Posted without readable text
Сделал себе ещё один Quality Gate. Их много не бывает, потому что СДВГ-агенты постоянно пишут всякую фигню, а чтобы держать их в узде, нужно много проверок Так вот, это линтер документации. Он проверяет, что вся документация связана между собой markdown-ссылками как минимум сверху вниз. Верхние входные точки (entry points) это стандартный набор: README.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md Link these orphan tree roots…
🔥3
Когда-то писал про import-linter для контроля за архитектурными границами в питонячих проектах. Так вот, нашёл ему намного более крутую замену: tach Чуть позже напишу более подробно
👀1
Если кто угорает по кибербезу, Cisco Foundation AI на днях выпустило целое семейство SLM (Small Language Model) с открытыми весами, валяется на Huggingface. Их там целое семейство. Важно: лицензия Apache 2.0, то есть можно в коммерции юзать https://huggingface.co/fdtn-ai Была бы еще одна жизнь, прямо бы сейчас пошел гонять на Modal 🫠
🔥1
Лежит инфра у OpenAI HTTP 503: { "error": { "message": "Service Unavailable", "type": null, "code": "biscuit_baker_service_me_circuit_open",
😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vlbecode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vibecoding is so last year” (@vlbecode), 99 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlbecode.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.