Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for a bat under the moon

Channel

a bat under the moon

@vnsh3d

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

73subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757418160
TypeChannel
Username@vnsh3d
Created6 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vnsh3d

Growth

738277.58 August 2026 — 82 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82 subscribers16 August 2026 — 79 subscribers24 August 2026 — 76 subscribers31 August 2026 — 74 subscribers10 September 2026 — 73 subscribers8 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 14:3773-1
31 Aug 2026, 10:3774-2
24 Aug 2026, 19:1476-3
16 Aug 2026, 16:0479-3
9 Aug 2026, 18:1582no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:3182first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

147 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘4027.2%
custom 53147815449911899583725.2%
custom 54565055443847366802416.3%
custom 54066221406465693542215.0%
custom 5251561498999818168106.80%
custom 539780982123792269685.44%
❤‍🔥64.08%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

как же я люблю этот контраст эх

💘1custom 53978098212379226961

8 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC36 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

российские фигуристы не заслуживают выступать на ои даже под нейтральным флагом. с фактом того, что они открыто поддерживают войну или как у них принято говорить "сво" они не имеют права на какую-либо нейтральность 🤷🏻‍♀️

custom 54066221406465693544💘2

6 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC73 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

йоу #blndr

custom 52515614989998181689custom 53978098212379226965custom 54066221406465693545

6 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC59 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tonymrtmr

associations fr. 静angelic laughter подберу фильм/сериал по вашему вайбу + коллаж (ваш аромат и мои ассоциации). рт, рк, псевдоним на англ. выборочно возьму 5 каналов

5 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC67 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я никогда не буду считать за контент "статьи", которые делались как копировать вставить из википедии или какой-нибудь иишки

custom 53147815449911899589custom 54565055443847366803💘1

5 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC126 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

это не "изнслование", "износ", "🍇", "grape", "r4pe", "r*pe". это изнасилование. и пока люди продолжают всячески избегать этого слова, тема всё ещё остаётся "грязной". я не вижу смысла распинаться о том, что любой подобный опыт валиден вне зависимости от пола, возраста или внешности, так как это всем давным-давно ясно. а если вы вдруг считаете, что "ой, он не мог подвергнуться изнасилованию потому что он мужчина" или

💘16custom 52515614989998181681custom 54066221406465693541

5 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC69 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @LETS_SURF_ALL_DAYPhoto

. 🤩 🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🐾 от маши бразил 🎀 все мы в детстве играли в браузерные игры! 🎀 это одно из светлых воспоминаний о беззаботном времени - детстве. 🔠 вам ... 🤩 какой вы человек, основываясь на вашей любимой игре детства! ✨ (все сугубо объективно, моё мнение, не несущее никакой цели оскорбить, задеть, вызвать негативные эмоции) 🔠🔡 мне ... 🌟 репост, обязате

4 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC68 viewsread 9 August 2026

выглянул в окно, увидел машины с номерами, в которых есть 67 у одной и 69 у другой, заплакал

3 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC95 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

попытки понять, кто же всё-таки находится во фронте ощущаются как-то так:

2 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC90 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я чувствую как у меня отмирает мозг

💘5custom 53147815449911899583custom 54565055443847366802

1 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC96 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

у меня пока нет настроя что-то постить.. я очень нервничаю при любой смене обстановки, хотя надеялся, что в этот раз получится этого избежать 🫩 нейроотличностьVSсмена обстановки

custom 54565055443847366807custom 53147815449911899583custom 54066221406465693542

30 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC103 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

вот бы свидание в океанариуме, а потом ехать домой под депеш мод

💘7custom 54565055443847366804custom 54066221406465693543custom 53147815449911899582

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vnsh3d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“a bat under the moon” (@vnsh3d), 73 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vnsh3d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.