Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لـِ ސاމ ، ||

Channel

لـِ ސاމ ، ||

@vo_xzz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,565subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002038313563
TypeChannel
Username@vo_xzz
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vo_xzz

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5651,6361,600.513 August 2026 — 1,636 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,636 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,634 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,631 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,603 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,600 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,593 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,582 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,574 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,565 subscribers13 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,554–1,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 21:011,565-9
12 Sept 2026, 18:411,574-8
8 Sept 2026, 18:201,582-11
3 Sept 2026, 02:391,593-7
30 Aug 2026, 14:441,600-3
27 Aug 2026, 06:531,603-4
24 Aug 2026, 06:361,607-12
20 Aug 2026, 22:431,619-12
18 Aug 2026, 08:121,631-3
15 Aug 2026, 00:231,634-2
13 Aug 2026, 22:501,636no change
13 Aug 2026, 22:491,636first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1842.9%
1023.8%
🍓511.9%
💋49.52%
❤‍🔥24.76%
😍24.76%
🌚12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 13 August 2026

ال معلمه دودا ف الكول https://t.me/VS3VO?videochat

26 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC270 viewsread 13 August 2026

أن تُقر أعيُننا بأزواجٍ وبيوتٍ وذريةٍ صالحةٍ يُحبها اللّٰه ورسولِه ورفيقٍ صالح، نأمنُ معهُ على الدين والدُّنيا معًا يارب."))

7 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC487 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1😁1

31 Mar 2026, 17:24 UTC≈2,020 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

- أحب أن أكون مختلفًا عن الجميع، أحب أن أبدو غريبًا، نادرا. ⭐

1😁1

17 Dec 2025, 08:38 UTC≈2,400 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

*‏فِي الشرُّود ، أنت كُلُّ الإحتمَالَات ♥️♥️

🍓4❤‍🔥2😍2😁1

10 Dec 2025, 14:00 UTC≈2,590 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𓏺 𝗶𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗶𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗲𝘆𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗷𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗹 𝗶 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 🖤🤩.

3😁1

9 Dec 2025, 10:56 UTC≈2,190 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

"فيه جُملة بتقول " . إللي في قلبه حنيّة عِشرته فيها الأمان يعني ايه ؟ يعني اللي قلبه حنيّن في عز ماهو متضايق منك ومتخانقين مع بعض ، مش هيفكر ويخطط ازاي يوجعك ،، مش هيقلل من كرامتك ولا هيفكر يهيــنك ولا هيدوس على نقطة ضعفك ،، مش هينكر الحلو اللي شافه منك ولا هيفتكرلك العيوب بس،.. هيبقى فيها أمان ع روحك وقلبك وحياتك كلها حرفيًا مش أي حد عنده القدرة علي العطاء ،، في ناس عندهم جمود إحساس تجاه الآخرين مبيعرفوش يهوِّنوا ،

😁1

9 Dec 2025, 02:08 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 13 August 2026

ــ اللّي فيٰ طَبعُه الِحنّيّة مَتخَافِش ، عَلىٰ نَفسك مَعاه 💓💓💓💓💓🤍"

8 Dec 2025, 11:40 UTC≈2,120 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

My beauty and my embrace 👄💘

😁1

8 Dec 2025, 10:09 UTC≈1,800 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

- Are you made of magic? Because every time i see you, everything else🌟 disappears🌟

😁1

7 Dec 2025, 10:22 UTC≈1,730 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

I am so sexy and if you fall into my net, I will make you fall into my net like a spider .🩸✨

😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vo_xzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لـِ ސاމ ، ||” (@vo_xzz), 1,565 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vo_xzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.