Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش انگلیسی با آرش نیا

Channel

آموزش انگلیسی با آرش نیا

@vocabulary_01

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,524subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001013801784
TypeChannel
Username@vocabulary_01
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vocabulary_01

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,5246,6206,5725 August 2026 — 6,619 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,619 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,620 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,610 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,599 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,595 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,588 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,587 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,583 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,585 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,580 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,569 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,567 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,557 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,548 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,551 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,543 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,542 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,541 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,537 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,533 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,534 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,532 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,526 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,524 subscribers5 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,510–6,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 22:106,524-2
4 Nov 2026, 22:596,526-6
1 Nov 2026, 22:596,532-2
26 Oct 2026, 02:076,534+1
23 Oct 2026, 06:546,533-4
20 Oct 2026, 16:316,537-4
18 Oct 2026, 00:266,541-1
14 Oct 2026, 15:106,542-1
11 Oct 2026, 14:216,543-8
4 Oct 2026, 18:586,551+3
25 Sept 2026, 06:156,548-9
17 Sept 2026, 07:026,557-10
13 Sept 2026, 11:006,567-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:556,569-11
3 Sept 2026, 20:566,580-5
31 Aug 2026, 05:576,585+2
28 Aug 2026, 05:046,583-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:346,587-1
21 Aug 2026, 21:486,588-7
18 Aug 2026, 12:576,595first reading

Engagement

169 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 6,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
100
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 169 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held169 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total5,318
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40m 52s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

514 reactions across 145 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24547.7%
👍8316.1%
👏7715.0%
🥰499.53%
🙏346.61%
🥴81.56%
🔥40.778%
😍40.778%
💯30.584%
👌20.389%
💩20.389%
😁20.389%
🤯10.195%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 165 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 20:56 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🤔 شما هم موقع ساختن جمله به انگلیسی، شک می‌کنید که درسته یا نه؟ فکر می‌کنی زبان سخته؟ 😬 خبر خوب اینه که با روش جدید ما، انگلیسی رو خیلی راحت‌تر از چیزی که تصور می‌کنی یاد می‌گیری! 🔥 ✅ آموزش قدم به قدم از صفر تا پیشرفته ✅ تمرین واقعی با فیلم و سریال 🎬 ✅ تخفیف ویژه + مشاوره رایگان ✅ گارانتی طلایی (بازگشت وجه در صورت عدم رضایت) 📲 برای ثبت‌نام فقط کافیه نام و شماره تماست رو به آیدی زیر ارسال کنی: 👇 👉 T.me/Speedyenglis

❤1

6 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @dehkadeloghatPoll

There ……. Some people waiting too see you! یک عده منتظرن که تورو ببینن !

  1. Am7%
  2. Is19%
  3. Are73%
  4. Aren’t1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤1👍1🙏1

6 Nov 2026, 18:16 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🎥 ویدیو نظر یکی دیگه از زبان‌آموزای ما که حالا با اعتمادبه‌نفس انگلیسی صحبت می‌کنه! 😍 با بسته جامع VIP Plus شما هم می‌تونید مسیر یادگیری‌تون رو متحول کنید و مثل صدها نفر دیگه، نتیجه واقعی بگیرید! 🎓 این دوره، پر استقبال‌ترین دوره آموزش زبان در کشوره و حالا نوبت شماست که شروع کنید! 📲 برای دریافت اطلاعات بیشتر و مشاوره رایگان، نام و شماره تماستون رو به آیدی زیر ارسال کنید: 👇 T.me/Speedyenglish

❤1👏1

6 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @dehkadeloghatPoll

چای کم رنگ

  1. Strong tea14%
  2. Weak tea70%
  3. Herbal tea13%
  4. Tea bag3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2👏1🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC124 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🔻 💠 چجوری بگم چیزی رو ندارم ⁉️ I don't have .... .... ندارم جرئتش و ندارم 😬 I don't have the guts. پولش و ندارم💰 I don't have the money. دلش و ندارم💓 I don't have the heart. قدرتش و ندارم💫 I don't have the power. انگیزش و ندارم🌈 I don't have the motivation. @Vocabulary_01

❤3🥰1🙏1

6 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

📚 با این اپلیکیشن و کتابخانه دیجیتال، یادگیری زبان از همیشه راحت‌تر شده! دیگه وقتشه همه بهونه‌ها رو کنار بذاری! چون ما همه چی رو برات آماده کردیم 😍 ✅ دسترسی آنی به دوره‌ها بلافاصله بعد از ثبت‌نام ✅ آموزش کامل از صفر تا پیشرفته، داخل اپلیکیشنی ساده و کاربردی ✅ بدون نیاز به فیلترشکن — همیشه و همه‌جا در دسترس ✅ پشتیبانی اختصاصی + کارت گارانتی ۱۰۰٪ بازگشت وجه ✅ اگه بخوای، فلش‌ مموری حاوی دوره‌ها رو هم چندروزه درب منزل تح…

❤3👏1

6 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC134 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026

از شنبه شروع میکنم بخدا از شنبه دیگه شروع میکنم چند بار با این جمله خودتو گول زدی؟ از اون شنبه ای که قرار بود شروع کنی چند هفته، ماه یا سال گذشته؟😔 فقط اینو بدون این بار اگه شروع نکنی کلا باختی 🎯اگه میخوای با قدرت شروع کنی و با برنامه انگلیسی یاد بگیری، نام و شماره تماست رو بفرست به آیدی زیر راهنمایی کنیم 👇 T.me/Speedyenglish دقیق میگیم چطور و از کجا باید شروع کنی مشاوره رایگانه

❤1👍1

6 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @dehkadeloghatPoll

لطف کردین تشریف آوردین.

  1. It’s nice of you to come.66%
  2. It’s nice of you in come.34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2👌1👏1🥴1

6 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC79 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

کره میشه Butter، مگس هم میشه Fly . حالا بگو "Butterfly به فارسی چی میشه؟ زبان انگلیسی سخته؟ ویدیو رو ببین نظرت عوض میشه ما بهت اطمینان میدیم که زبان انگلیسی رو خیلی راحت و اصولی یاد میگیری برای شروع فقط کافیه نام و شماره تماست رو به آیدی زیر بفرستی و منتظر تماس رایگان مشاوران ما باشی 👇 T.me/Speedyenglish

❤2🥰2👍1

6 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC160 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Sometimes you have to just hang on and trust that life's storms are carrying you to better shores - Jane Lee Logan گاهى وقتا فقط بايد صبور باشی و باور داشته باشی طوفان هاى زندگى تو رو به ساحل هاى بهترى ميبرن @Vocabulary_01

❤4👏1

5 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC177 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

If God brings you to it he will bring you through it اگه خدا اين شرايط رو سر راهت گذاشته، خودش هم تو رو از بین اون رد ميكنه @Vocabulary_01

🙏4❤2

5 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @dehkadeloghatPoll

من مدیونتم.

  1. I own you.39%
  2. I owe you.52%
  3. I hold you.6%
  4. I pick you.3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2👏2🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @vocabulary_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @vocabulary_01 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 44 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz160 voters

There ……. Some people waiting too see you! یک عده منتظرن که تورو ببینن !

  1. Am7%
  2. Is19%
  3. Are73%
  4. Aren’t1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz222 voters

چای کم رنگ

  1. Strong tea14%
  2. Weak tea70%
  3. Herbal tea13%
  4. Tea bag3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz155 voters

لطف کردین تشریف آوردین.

  1. It’s nice of you to come.66%
  2. It’s nice of you in come.34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz257 voters

من مدیونتم.

  1. I own you.39%
  2. I owe you.52%
  3. I hold you.6%
  4. I pick you.3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz217 voters

وقتت را تلف نکن

  1. Don’t kill your time15%
  2. Don’t lose your time10%
  3. Don’t waste your time30%
  4. All45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz650 voters

"خیلی سوسولی" به انگلیسی چی میشه؟

  1. You are sessy!26%
  2. You are sissy!59%
  3. You are sessi!16%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🌸عاشقان زبان انگلیسی🌸
@ZabanRahate · 19,821
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026
آموزش زبان انگلیسی روان
@eng_ravan · 53,698
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
مرتضی نظری/مکالمه انگلیسی
@mortezanariofficial · 33,603
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
English.Farzan | آکادمی زبان انگلیسی فرزان
@englishfarzan2 · 117,228
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
نجوم 🛰
@njoom2070 · 30,516
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش انگلیسی با آرش نیا” (@vocabulary_01), 6,524 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vocabulary_01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.