Channel
@volochek69
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,349subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001252386939 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @volochek69 |
| Created | 13 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/volochek69 |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 13,349 | +2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 13,347 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 13,354 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 13,360 | +29 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 13,331 | +3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 13,328 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 13,334 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:04 | 13,336 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:46 | 13,337 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 13,340 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 13,335 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 13,332 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 13,335 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 13,339 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 13,337 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 13,336 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 13,334 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 13,335 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 13,331 | +14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 13,317 | first reading |
366 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 100 of 132 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 366 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 91,108 |
| Reactions total | 791 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,817 reactions across 257 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 621 | 34.2% | |
| 👍 | 235 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 225 | 12.4% | |
| 👎 | 157 | 8.64% | |
| 😁 | 142 | 7.82% | |
| 😨 | 76 | 4.18% | |
| 😡 | 67 | 3.69% | |
| 🗿 | 48 | 2.64% | |
| 🫡 | 32 | 1.76% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 1.32% | |
| 🤨 | 24 | 1.32% | |
| 🙈 | 23 | 1.27% | |
| 😐 | 20 | 1.10% | |
| 👀 | 19 | 1.05% | |
| 🤗 | 18 | 0.991% | |
| 💋 | 17 | 0.936% | |
| 🕊 | 14 | 0.771% | |
| 🤪 | 11 | 0.605% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 0.385% | |
| 😘 | 6 | 0.33% | |
| 13 further kinds | 31 | 1.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 268 of the 366 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 366 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzquoCJZh | 1 | 25 August 2026 | 25 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqvJTYUj | 1 | 24 August 2026 | 24 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqvtsdy5 | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqxCYRaa | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqxJFKb8 | 1 | 21 August 2026 | 21 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 366 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
✉️ Добрый вечер 🌆 очень разочарованы школой номер 19 . Еще за несколько дней прогноз погоды показывал что будет дождь . Линейка на улице , ливень , все дети промокли на сквозь . В итоге нас завели в спорт зал который был грязный , окна биты перебиты , все заколоченное, видимо ремонт там был последний раз лет 20 назад , как в заброшенную школу пришли . Очень стыдно , особенно нам родителям перед детьми что мы отправи…
❤3⚡1💯1🤨1
Почти половина россиян показала признаки ухудшения психического состояния Данные мониторинга Института психологии РАН: 49% опрошенных — с признаками ухудшения, 33% — с тревожностью, а у 36% — высокий уровень тревожно-депрессивной симптоматики. Исследователи связывают это с пессимистичными ожиданиями в экономике, замедлением роста доходов и снижением уверенности в скором завершении СВО. Не исключают и сезонный факто…
❤1
Коты любят своих хозяев сильнее, чем кажется Питомцы способны формировать с человеком глубокую эмоциональную связь, искать у него защиту и проявлять привязанность. Когда кот устраивается на коленях и мурчит, такой приятный контакт может влиять на уровень окситоцина, связанного с доверием и близостью. Для многих котов хозяин становится не просто человеком, который наполняет миску, а тем, рядом с кем спокойно и безоп…
❤7
В Вышневолоцком округе через суд освободили 34 земельных участка Прокуратура выяснила, что за ликвидированным кооперативом «Мир» всё ещё числилось право постоянного пользования 34 сельхозучастками. После обращения надзорного ведомства суд признал это право отсутствующим и постановил исключить соответствующие записи из реестра недвижимости.
📩 Кто-нибудь знает, куда пропала холодная вода в доме по адресу Воровского, 83а? Уже полдня нет. От Ульяны Веселовой
Пенсионерка из Ржева пять раз передавала мошенникам деньги — всего 9,2 млн рублей. 73-летней женщине позвонили неизвестные и представились сотрудниками силовых органов и Центробанка. Они заявили, что её счета якобы используют для поддержки ВСУ. Чтобы «спасти» накопления, пенсионерку убедили снять наличные и отдавать их курьерам. Деньги забирали пять раз. Одного из курьеров — 21-летнего уроженца Украины — операти…
👀4
анонимно. ищу подработку после колледжа,девушка,18 лет
Posted without readable text
❤1
Тверская область Бежецкие закаты
❤7
Posted without readable text
Минпросвещения ограничило учебный день для школьников tvtver.ru/news/minpr... Режим каждая школа должна установить самостоятельно, но есть рамки, за которые выходить нельзя Учебный день в школах не может начинаться раньше 8 часов утра и заканчиваться позднее 19 часов при наличии второй смены. Такое правило, как подчеркнул руководитель Института содержания и методов обучения имени Леднева Максим Костенко, будет дей…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 366 posts we hold for @volochek69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой вариант больше нравится?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 366 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вышний Волочёк - говорим и показываем” (@volochek69), 13,349 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volochek69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.