В Вологде нашли 85 фрагментов средневековой керамики из Германии В большинстве российских городов такие изделия встречаются крайне редко — обычно археологи находят лишь отдельные фрагменты https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/v-vologde-nashli-85-fragmentov-srednevekovoy-keramiki-iz-germanii

Channel
Вологда-поиск
@vologdapoisk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,762subscribers
-564 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001302989593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vologdapoisk |
| Description | 🔎Вологда-поиск. Заявление РКН № 6128055561 |
| Created | 11 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vologdapoisk |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 7,762 | -21 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 7,783 | -27 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:21 | 7,810 | -21 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 7,831 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 7,838 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 7,850 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 7,858 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:51 | 7,865 | -4 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 7,869 | -100 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:42 | 7,969 | -142 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 8,111 | -49 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 8,160 | -9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 8,169 | -10 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 8,179 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 8,184 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 8,193 | -111 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 8,304 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 8,311 | +16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 8,295 | -11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 8,306 | first reading |
Engagement
346 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.10%
- avg views ÷ 7,762 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 163
- 94 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 346 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 346 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,301 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈23,000
- Videos
- ≈3,110
- Links
- ≈23,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 30m 14s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
315 reactions across 189 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 82 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5219886961300377283 | 81 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 69 | 21.9% | |
| 👏 | 48 | 15.2% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 8.25% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.59% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.635% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.317% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.317% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 199 of the 346 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 346 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 94 posts held from the last 30 days (19.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Солнце заметно оживилось. Со вчерашнего вечера идет интенсивный рост вспышечной активности. Ее индекс за сутки вырос с 2 до 5 по 10-балльной шкале и перешел из зеленой зоны в оранжевую. Подробнее: https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/nauka/slabye-buri-na-zemle-iz-za-vspyshek-na-solntse-mogut-pereyti-v-tyazheluyu-kategoriyu
В Госдуме заявляют: «А покупатели в чём виноваты?» https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/v-gosdume-zayavlyayut-a-pokupateli-v-chyom-vinovaty
ВЦИОМ: президенту России доверяют 77,5% опрошенных https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/vtsiom-prezidentu-rossii-doveryayut-77-5-oproshennyh
Под Череповцом обнаружили стихийную свалку, которую мог "организовать" местный предприниматель Свалку нашли в лесу рядом с населенным пунктом, где проживают более 130 человек https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/pod-cherepovtsom-obnaruzhili-stihiynuyu-svalku-kotoruyu-mog-organizovat-mestnyy-predprinimatel
Перечень «запрещёнки» в спорте вновь скорректировали https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/perechen-zapreschyonki-v-sporte-vnov-skorrektirovali
Памятник Северянину В Череповце установили памятник поэту Игорю Северянину. Бронзовая скульптура появилась в новом сквере на улице Милютина. Поэт изображен читающим стихи, с лилией в руке. Высота памятника — 2 метра 75 сантиметров.
В Вологде в Ковыринском парке построят новый храм Уже определены границы прихрамовой территории https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/v-vologde-v-kovyrinskom-parke-postroyat-novyy-hram
Работу президента Владимира Путина положительно оценили 75% опрошенных https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/rabotu-prezidenta-vladimira-putina-polozhitelno-otsenili-75-oproshennyh
«Продукты – это новая роскошь?» https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/produkty-eto-novaya-roskosh
«Организации надо стимулировать создавать защиту от БПЛА» https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/organizatsii-nado-stimulirovat-sozdavat-zaschitu-ot-bpla
«Military Watch Magazine»: «Российские авиаконструкторы решили сложнейшую задачу» https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/military-watch-magazine-rossiyskie-aviakonstruktory-reshili-slozhneyshuyu-zadachu
Showing the 12 most recent of 346 posts we hold for @vologdapoisk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@partbilet35 · 21,74156 postsВологодские нелепости
@volneleposti · 18,74521 postsЧереповец-поиск
@cherpoisk · 2,1712 postsФилимонов LIVE
@filimonov_official · 53,2361 postНовости Верещагина|молочный рынок
@moloko35 · 20,7901 post#НАСВЯЗИ Вологодский колледж связи и информационных технологий
@na_sviazy35 · 3031 postСЗФО / ВЕРСИЯ
@novostiszfo · 1,3231 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@volneleposti · 18,745
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
@onlinemedia35 · 22,499
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
@volanalitic · 135,343
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@ZVO35 · 17,431
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 September 2026
@privide_los · 22,940
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
@partbilet35 · 21,741
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 October 2026
@vologdapoz · 117,199
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вологда-поиск” (@vologdapoisk), 7,762 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vologdapoisk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.