Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 36ON Воронеж|Новости

Channel

36ON Воронеж|Новости

@voronezh36on

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,899subscribers

+158 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658551295
TypeChannel
Username@voronezh36on
DescriptionОфициальный телеграм-канал сетевого издания 36ON Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ Эл № ФС77-57880 от 25 апреля 2014 года. Поделиться новостью: @VRN36on_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/voronezh36on

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,7419,9369,838.56 August 2026 — 9,741 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,752 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,766 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,776 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,797 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,809 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,850 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,848 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,853 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,861 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,871 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,874 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,907 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,902 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,927 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,931 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,926 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,936 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,929 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,936 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,922 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,907 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,899 subscribers9,8996 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,712–9,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 07:019,899-8
2 Nov 2026, 04:019,907-15
30 Oct 2026, 04:219,922-14
26 Oct 2026, 20:089,936+7
24 Oct 2026, 04:309,929-7
20 Oct 2026, 23:319,936+10
18 Oct 2026, 04:309,926-5
14 Oct 2026, 20:369,931+4
11 Oct 2026, 21:229,927+25
4 Oct 2026, 23:429,902-5
26 Sept 2026, 05:019,907+33
17 Sept 2026, 17:019,874+3
13 Sept 2026, 21:399,871+10
10 Sept 2026, 05:009,861+8
5 Sept 2026, 02:009,853+5
1 Sept 2026, 08:079,848-2
29 Aug 2026, 17:579,850+41
26 Aug 2026, 09:339,809+12
23 Aug 2026, 05:189,797+21
20 Aug 2026, 00:189,776first reading

Engagement

506 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.57%
avg views ÷ 9,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
254
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
135
of 506 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 108 of 134 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held506 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total34,071
Reactions total538
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 22:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈21,500
Videos
≈3,250
Links
≈12,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 32m
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 100 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,597 reactions across 433 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤51519.8%
🔥40115.4%
🤬30111.6%
👏29611.4%
👍26910.4%
🤡1495.74%
🤣913.50%
👎783.00%
😱742.85%
😁712.73%
🙏592.27%
💯542.08%
😢220.847%
😭200.77%
🤯180.693%
custom 5465651939234584588120.462%
💩120.462%
🤮120.462%
🤔110.424%
🎉100.385%
33 further kinds1224.70%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 446 of the 506 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,656 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 506 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.78%
9 of 506 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
9
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
252
over 9 measured posts
Median views · rest
277
over 496 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VfnxvUFbqV519 August 202628 August 2026
2Vfnxy88XzT224 August 202625 August 2026
2VfnxvmXn4u15 November 20265 November 2026
2VfnxwU6Uts122 August 202622 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 506 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 135 posts held from the last 30 days (2.96%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC234 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

«Я набрался наглости»: о каком вопросе Путину рассказал воронежский губернатор Губернатор Воронежской области Александр Гусев рассказал, как решился обратиться к президенту Владимиру Путину с просьбой, от которой его отговаривали коллеги. Историей он поделился на деловом завтраке с участниками XII управленческой платформы имени Владимира Эйтингона. По словам главы региона, однажды перед встречей с президентом он об…

7 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC463 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Легендарный военный парад 1941 года воссоздали в Воронеже Осенью 1941 года обстановка на фронте была крайне тяжёлой. Немецкие войска наступали на Москву, линия боевых действий приближалась к Воронежской области. В самом Воронеже в то время размещалось командование Юго-Западного фронта. Несмотря на военную угрозу, 7 ноября 1941 года на площади 20-летия Октября, которая сегодня носит имя Ленина, состоялся парад в чес…

👍5

7 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC259 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Другого метробуса у нас для вас нет

👏3😁1

7 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC274 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Мигрантов-уклонистов искали в шаурмичной в Воронеже Военные следователи провели рейд среди мигрантов, получивших российское гражданство. Проверка прошла в Советском районе Воронежа. Всего сотрудники военного следственного отдела СК России проверили 14 человек. Одного из них доставили в военкомат для оформления документов. Остальным разъяснили обязанности по воинскому учёту. Никого из проверенных не оштрафовали, ко…

👍1

7 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC272 viewsread 7 November 2026

Обидное поражение «Факела» в матче с «Динамо» не расстроило воронежского губернатора Александр Гусев увидел в игре «огнеопасных» немало положительных моментов. «Наша команда большую часть матча провела на половине поля соперника. Мы по игре не уступили одному из лидеров чемпионата, не стушевались перед ним, но по немыслимому стечению обстоятельств не смогли добиться положительного результата», — написал губернатор. …

7 Nov 2026, 13:15 UTC246 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Лучший бомбардир "Факела" в прошлом сезоне Белайди Пуси не попал в пустые ворота. Обидно, ведь могла бы быть ничья.

👎1

7 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC238 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

"Факел" пропустил второй гол в добавленное время. Итог - 1:2 в пользу "Динамо"

👎1

7 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC264 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

НАМ ПИШУТ: Новый светофор. По дороге в Шилово. Напомню, на этом участке уже имеются два светофора: один на повороте к Ближним садам, другой на повороте к Дальним садам. Теперь вот скоро появится третий. Интересно, почему именно здесь , на этом повороте? Теперь скорость передвижения снизится, а дорожная пробка (особенно в часы пик на этом участке) увеличится. Поэтому всё-таки вопрос, почему и для кого именно здес…

7 Nov 2026, 11:28 UTC265 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

"Факел" сегодня принимает московское "Динамо" в Воронеже Отличился Вячеслав Якимов. Он сравнял счет.

7 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC254 views0 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Отопительный сезон в Воронеже стартовал 15 октября, но тепло дошло не до всех домов Жители дома №49 по улице Машиностроителей рапортуют, что батареи до сих пор холодные. Обслуживает их УК Парус. А в доме №91 по Московском проспекту отопительная эпопея длится еще с лета. Тогда был произведен капитальный ремонт системы отопления в подвале, подъездах и в квартирах, заменены стояки и радиаторы отопления. Надеялись, чт…

7 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC240 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Резвились новогодние волшебники недолго: припарковали свой не совсем зимний транспорт недалек от пирса и пошли раздавать подарки детям! И ведь правда раздают подарки! Условия, в отличие от способа передвижения Дедов Морозов, традиционные. Надо просто рассказать стих. Детям старше 30 лет подарки не достанутся 😭

7 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC250 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Бородатые резвятся по полной программе. Главное, чтобы подарки не растеряли!

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 506 posts we hold for @voronezh36on. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@voronezh36on edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Вы уже посмотрели «Колобка»?

  1. Да, мне понравилось4%
  2. Да, мне не зашло2%
  3. Пока нет, но планирую посмотреть18%
  4. Тотальный игнор, смотреть не буду76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 506 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TV Губерния. Воронеж
@tvgubernia · 20,283
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
Куда пойти в Воронеже | Афиша Воронежа
@go_vrn · 75,876
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Воронеж Сейчас
@voronezh1ru · 27,862
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Воронеж VRN ️
@vrn36v · 70,201
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
Новости Воронежа и Области
@smi_voronezh · 208,648
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
МЧС Воронежской области
@mchs36 · 27,274
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
Инцидент Воронеж
@vrinc · 64,299
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
МОЁ! Online. Воронеж
@moeonline · 38,030
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Блокнот Воронеж
@bloknot_vrn · 64,668
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
Регион-36 (Воронеж с огоньком)
@voronezh_r36 · 73,409
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“36ON Воронеж|Новости” (@voronezh36on), 9,899 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voronezh36on.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.