Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for По праву Востока

Channel

По праву Востока

@vostokpravo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,950subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001770788620
TypeChannel
Username@vostokpravo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vostokpravo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9501,9841,9676 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,981 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,979 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,976 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,973 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,970 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,968 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,967 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,963 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,957 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,954 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,950 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,945–1,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:371,950-4
14 Sept 2026, 00:391,954-3
10 Sept 2026, 17:201,957-6
5 Sept 2026, 09:551,963-4
1 Sept 2026, 13:591,967-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:471,968-2
26 Aug 2026, 01:121,970-3
23 Aug 2026, 10:571,973-3
19 Aug 2026, 17:161,976-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:251,979-2
13 Aug 2026, 02:461,981-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:011,983-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:321,984no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:321,984first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2438.1%
🔥2438.1%
1320.6%
👎11.59%
🙏11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неделя началась с хороших новостей. Вчера было опубликовано решение Апелляционного суда Дубая, которым оставлено в силе решение суда первой инстанции по одному из самых громких коммерческих споров последнего времени. Мы представляли интересы ответчиков и смогли сохранить решение об отказе в удовлетворении иска на сумму свыше 160 миллионов долларов США. Но особенно важно не только само решение, а его значение для су

🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC231 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Первый иностранный адвокат в официальном реестре адвокатов ОАЭ. Что на самом деле произошло? На этой неделе многие СМИ сообщили, что британский юрист Byron James стал первым иностранным адвокатом, включенным в официальный реестр адвокатов ОАЭ. Но самое интересное здесь не сама новость, а процедура, которая стоит за этим решением. Важно понимать, что речь идет не обо всех судах ОАЭ, а о Civil Family Court Абу-Даби

6

5 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC274 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Приятные новости. Вчера прошла церемония награждения рейтинга WEALTH Navigator «Юристы для частного капитала 2026». Если честно, к рейтингам я всегда отношусь спокойно. Для юриста лучший рейтинг - это клиент, который возвращается второй раз и рекомендует тебя друзьям. Но есть исключения. WEALTH Navigator довольно узкоспециализированное исследование. Оно посвящено не всему юридическому рынку, а именно сопровождени

🔥4👍3

3 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC299 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Партнеры и коллеги, Как большой друг ПравоТех, хочу поделиться интересной инициативой, которая, на мой взгляд, хорошо показывает, как сегодня должен развиваться юридический ИИ. 💼 Справится ли ИИ с вашей юридической задачей? ПравоКонсультант готовит полноценное правовое заключение с выводами, аргументацией и судебной практикой. Но главное правило остается неизменным: окончательное решение всегда принимает юрист. С

1 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC378 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляю моего партнера, Dr. Khaled Alhadhrami, с публикацией новой статьи в CPJ Law Journal! 👏 Работа посвящена теме, с которой юристам приходится сталкиваться все чаще, киберпреследованию, онлайн-клевете, цифровому вымогательству и их финансовым последствиям. Что показалось особенно интересным с практической точки зрения? ▪️ Автор показывает, что в ОАЭ дела о киберпреступлениях - это уже давно не только про уг

🔥3👎1

31 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC377 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не каждое дело доходит до Верховного суда Англии. И уж точно не каждое заканчивается изменением судебной практики. Поэтому сегодня хочется поздравить нашего Counsel Bledi Albri с действительно выдающимся профессиональным достижением. В деле Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2026] UKSC 29 Бледи представлял интересы стороны в Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — высшей судебной инстанции Англии и Уэльса. Более того, Вер

👍6🔥31

31 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC543 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна победа нашей практики White-Collar Crime в ОАЭ. Совместно с Dr. Khaled Ali Alhadhrami нашей команде удалось добиться освобождения клиента из-под стражи менее чем за 24 часа после задержания по линии INTERPOL Red Notice. Подобные дела требуют не только глубокого знания уголовного права ОАЭ, но и опыта работы с международными механизмами Интерпола, экстрадиции и экстренной судебной защиты. Продолжаем защища

🔥65👍3

30 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC419 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We would like to express our sincere apologies to Alaryani Advocates & Legal Consultants for our incorrect interpretation of the DIFC Court’s judgment in our Telegram publication. Our comments were based on our own understanding of the decision, and it was never our intention to misrepresent the Court’s findings or to make any adverse or inaccurate statements about Alaryani Advocates & Legal Consultants. We sincere

🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @vostokpravo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“По праву Востока” (@vostokpravo), 1,950 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vostokpravo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.