12 measurements spanning 31 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,646–5,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 12:38
5,648
-8
2 Sept 2026, 05:44
5,656
-2
30 Aug 2026, 09:57
5,658
+6
27 Aug 2026, 04:15
5,652
-8
24 Aug 2026, 09:05
5,660
+3
20 Aug 2026, 06:25
5,657
-3
17 Aug 2026, 09:52
5,660
-2
13 Aug 2026, 07:16
5,662
-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:32
5,663
+4
7 Aug 2026, 00:17
5,659
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:32
5,661
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:02
5,661
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,707 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,270
46.9%
🤣
936
34.6%
🔥
183
6.76%
❤
113
4.17%
👍
89
3.29%
💯
35
1.29%
🆒
19
0.702%
🏆
18
0.665%
👀
12
0.443%
🗿
10
0.369%
👎
9
0.332%
🤔
5
0.185%
⚡
3
0.111%
🥰
2
0.074%
👏
1
0.037%
💔
1
0.037%
🤝
1
0.037%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,707 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vovopapcom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
"As you've heard me say many times, I’ve always believed the No.1 application of AI should be to improve human health. It’s time for AI to prove its unequivocal value to the world, and what better way to demonstrate that than to help finally cure diseases like cancer." - Demis Hassabis.
https://blog.google/company-news/inside-google/message-ceo/next-chapter-ai-momentum/
Hop jiddiyroq gapiradigan bo’lsam…
AI ishimni tez orada olib qo’yadiganga o’xshamaydi. AI rostan ham ishimni ancha tezlashtiryapti, ayniqsa system design research va coding uchun. Bu meni dasturchi sifatida rostan ham samarali qilyaptimi yoki shunchaki tezlik hissini beryaptimi, hozircha aniq aytolmayman. Lekin aniq aytolaman — AI bilan men 10x dasturchiga aylanmadim.
Balki bu rostdan ham skill issue’dur, lekin ush…
Germaniyada yaqinda velosipedimni balonini 3ta spisasi sinib tushdi, ustaga oborsam usta aka 11ta spisani $80ga yangilab berdi. “Yuribmiz ekanda” dedim o’zimga o’zim.
Keyin O’zbekistonda havo juda issib ketti, konditsioner o’rnataman deb 2-3ta ustadan narxlarni surishtirsam konditsioner trubasini metriga $25 ekan. “Yuribmiz ekanda pragrammist bo’lib” dedim o’zimga o’zim.
Keyin O’zbekistonda mebel zakaz qilmoqchi bo…
Bir airport ishchisi futbolkamni ko'rib qirg'izmisan deb so'radi. Men yo'q o'zbekman dedim. Ichimda esa "Qanaqa qirg'iz? Qirg'izlar chempionatga chiqdimi?" dedim.
Qiziquvchanlik.
Siz qishloqda yashaysiz. Qishlog’ingizda qandaydur texnologiya mavjud, juda ko’p emas. Internet va smartfonlar ishlatiladi. Bir kuni siz bir aql bovar qilmaydigan video ko’rib qoldingiz. Unga o’xshash narsa tushingizga ham kirmagan. Do’stingizga ko’rsatsangiz u “haa bu Eyayku” deydi. Siz Eyay nima deb so’raysiz. Sizdan uncha aqlli bo'lmagan do'stingiz javob beradi — “Eyay bu yangi narsa, rasm va vide…
Me: Hmm, do we really need this method call in all test cases?
LLM: Yes, the method call is needed because [provides elaborate explanation].
Me: But we didn't need it in the other test class?
LLM: That's because [provides elaborate explanation].
Me: Alright, sounds good. But let's see if they pass without it.
LLM: Okay, I will remove the call and run the tests...
LLM: Oh wait they passed! I was wrong because [provide…
Unit testlarni ko'ngildagidek fix qila olmagandan keyin LLMga aniq instruksiya berdim... Hamma testlarni run qilib menga javoblarni ro'yxat qilib ber: PASS yoki FAILED. Keyin birgalikda har birini qanday fix qilishni muhokama qilamiz.
LLM esa testlarni run qildida va shart o'zi bilgancha yana fix qilib quya qoldi🗿
Jazo sifatida birdan milliongacha sanashni buyurdim.
🤣224😁11❤2👍2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vovopapcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Yetim dasturchi kundaligi @yetimdasturchi · 36,476 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Aziz Rahimov @azizrakhimov_blog · 58,716 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Mubosharat @Mubosharat · 30,384 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 7 September 2026
Ustoz AI @ustozai · 57,855 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
GrantGO @grantgouz · 46,101 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
ustozation @ustozation · 37,153 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
Alisher Sadullaev @alisher_sadullaev · 244,051 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Iqtisodchi Kundaligi @iqtisodchi_kundaligi · 32,908 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Muhammad Ali | Rasmiy Blog @Muhammadali_Eshonqulov · 57,906 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Abdusattor @abdusattor · 60,009 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Abituriyent | Axborot portali @Abituriyent_DTMuzb_Dtmuz_Dtm_uz · 62,310 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
TATU | Rasmiy kanali @tuituz_official · 36,260 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Najot Ta'lim @najottalim · 39,100 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
. @MubashshirAhmad · 31,050 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Ingliz tilini o'rganamiz @ingliz_tiliuz · 32,803 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Hasanxon Yahyo Abdulmajid | Rasmiy @hasanxondomlauz · 56,087 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Islom.uz @islomuz · 123,741 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Linguabarno @linguabarno · 58,173 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
GERMANIYA LIVE @Germaniya_Live · 157,585 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
Макеты для верстки @figma2html · 45,984 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vohid Karimov” (@vovopapcom), 5,648 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vovopapcom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.