Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Цепная Реакция

Channel

Цепная Реакция

@vpelevin_misli

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,036subscribers

-5,502 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001858872104
TypeChannel
Username@vpelevin_misli
DescriptionКрипта, технологии и регулирование — как одно событие запускает последствия для всего рынка.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vpelevin_misli

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,03619,53816,7877 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -5,502. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,211–20,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:2814,036-6
6 Nov 2026, 08:5514,042-3
5 Nov 2026, 07:0014,045-25
4 Nov 2026, 06:0714,070-14
3 Nov 2026, 02:5614,084-4
2 Nov 2026, 06:1014,088-17
1 Nov 2026, 04:2114,105-14
31 Oct 2026, 03:3014,119-9
30 Oct 2026, 06:4714,128-41
29 Oct 2026, 06:1814,169-30
28 Oct 2026, 05:4014,199-11
27 Oct 2026, 07:3114,210-20
26 Oct 2026, 08:2514,230-11
25 Oct 2026, 06:5414,241-18
24 Oct 2026, 10:1614,259-12
23 Oct 2026, 10:2014,271-8
22 Oct 2026, 12:5114,279-12
21 Oct 2026, 03:2714,291-5
20 Oct 2026, 00:3614,296-7
19 Oct 2026, 00:3614,303first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 14,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,080
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held69 (20 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total97,837
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈269
Videos
≈4
Links
≈3,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Advertising

Ad load
2.90%
2 of 69 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
64.0
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,470
over 67 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 12:52 UTC51 viewsread 8 November 2026

Греция вводит отдельный налоговый режим для криптоактивов Парламент Греции утвердил 10%-ный налог на прирост капитала от операций с криптоактивами. Годовая прибыль до €500 освобождается от налога, а дополнительные правила прозрачности и аудита должны появиться позже. Цепная реакция начинается с формализации. Сначала цифровой актив получает отдельный налоговый статус. Затем государству нужны понятные правила учёта сто…

5 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC64 viewsread 8 November 2026
Advertisement

Британский регулятор показал, что правила рекламы работают и для зарубежных криптоплощадок FCA добилась судебно закреплённого соглашения, по которому HTX должна прекратить незаконное продвижение услуг британским клиентам. Площадка не имеет разрешения работать на рынке Великобритании. Цепная реакция начинается с маркетинга. Если компания не допущена к рынку, ограничение касается не только самой услуги, но и активного …

4 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC81 viewsread 8 November 2026

Громкая поддержка токена сама по себе не доказывает мошенничество Федеральный судья в Аргентине прекратил уголовное расследование в отношении президента Хавьера Милея по делу о продвижении мем-токена, не обнаружив доказательств мошеннической схемы. Для рынка важен юридический принцип. Публичная поддержка способна резко усилить интерес к цифровому активу, но сама по себе ещё не устанавливает состав мошенничества. Необ…

3 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC88 viewsread 8 November 2026

Слабая криптоактивность заставляет финтех искать другие источники дохода У Robinhood выручка от операций с криптоактивами в третьем квартале снизилась на 55% год к году — до $120 млн. При этом общий транзакционный доход вырос благодаря опционам и рынкам прогнозов. Так работает цепная реакция зрелого бизнеса. Сначала один сегмент рынка замедляется. Затем платформа вынуждена опираться на другие продукты. После этого ус…

2 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC105 viewsread 8 November 2026

Конкуренция стейблкоинов переходит с выпуска на инфраструктуру Coinbase добавила ещё один долларовый стейблкоин на розничную и институциональную платформы. Для рынка важнее не конкретный токен, а сам тренд: крупные площадки больше не строят экосистему вокруг одного расчётного актива. Цепная реакция начинается с выбора. Чем больше регулируемых цифровых инструментов поддерживает инфраструктура, тем сильнее конкуренция …

1 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC98 viewsread 8 November 2026

Токенизированные деньги выходят из пилотов в корпоративную практику Опрос DBS среди 422 руководителей крупных компаний показал: 88% организаций уже используют или тестируют токенизированные деньги. Наиболее распространены стейблкоины, токенизированные депозиты и фонды денежного рынка. Цепная реакция начинается с казначейства. Компаниям важны быстрее расчёты, управление ликвидностью и доступ к новым рынкам. Затем банк…

31 Oct 2026, 09:42 UTC≈4,820 viewsread 8 November 2026

Крупнейший криптовзлом показал слабое место централизованной инфраструктуры С Binance вывели около $6,3 млрд. Биржа остановила вывод средств и заявила, что покроет потери за счёт собственных ресурсов. Аналитические компании связали атаку с северокорейской хакерской группой. Цепная реакция начинается не в блокчейне, а в системе контроля доступа. Если злоумышленник обходит внутренний механизм одобрения операций, под уг…

30 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC≈5,170 viewsread 8 November 2026

Европейский денежный фонд получил новый токенизированный класс Aviva Investors запустила токенизированный класс паёв своего крупного стерлингового фонда денежного рынка. Цифровое представление работает в публичной блокчейн-среде, тогда как сам фонд сохраняет прежнюю регулируемую структуру и экономическую сущность. Цепная реакция начинается с «цифрового двойника». Блокчейн добавляет новый слой учёта и взаимодействия, …

29 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC≈4,990 viewsread 8 November 2026

SEC ставит токенизацию в список приоритетов надзора Американский регулятор включил токенизированные ценные бумаги и изменение рыночной инфраструктуры в программу проверок на 2027 финансовый год. Цепная реакция начинается после экспериментального допуска. Сначала рынок получает пространство для новых моделей. Затем регулятор проверяет, как участники защищают инвесторов, ведут учёт собственности, управляют конфликтами …

28 Oct 2026, 19:18 UTC≈8,680 viewsread 8 November 2026

Токенизированный депозит выходит на розничный банковский рынок SoFi запустила цифровую форму банковского депозита для клиентов. В отличие от стейблкоина, такой инструмент представляет деньги, размещённые непосредственно в банке, а не обязательство отдельного эмитента цифрового токена. Цепная реакция начинается с переноса привычного банковского продукта в программируемую среду. Затем цифровой депозит можно встроить в …

27 Oct 2026, 19:18 UTC≈4,890 viewsread 8 November 2026

Coinbase Ireland получила штраф за недостатки в защите клиентских средств Центральный банк Ирландии оштрафовал местное подразделение Coinbase на €3,25 млн за нарушения требований к safeguarding и аутсорсингу в 2020–2025 годах. Компания признала нарушения; регулятор отметил недостатки в контроле и организации защиты средств. Цепная реакция начинается с ответственности инфраструктуры. Чем глубже криптосервис входит в р…

26 Oct 2026, 19:09 UTC≈5,200 viewsread 8 November 2026

США закрепили федеральные правила для платёжных стейблкоинов OCC утвердило финальные требования по GENIUS Act. Новый режим охватывает резервы, погашение, управление рисками, аудит, отчётность и хранение активов. Основная часть правил начнёт действовать 18 января 2027 года. Цепная реакция начинается с перехода от общих принципов к операционным требованиям. Эмитенту уже недостаточно заявить об обеспечении токена — необ…

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @vpelevin_misli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @vpelevin_misli as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Виктор Пелевин
@viktorpelevin · 32,569
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
М. Жванецкий
@jvanetskyy · 25,824
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
ВЕНИЧКИ
@venichka_erof · 25,493
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Ироничная библиотека
@ironi4naya · 31,746
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
Вечная философия
@tim_philosophy · 67,164
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Слава Сэ | Fan
@slava_ce · 22,900
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Будда
@prosvetlennyj · 44,956
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
Карл Густав Юнг
@Jung_tsitaty_psyhoIogia · 63,254
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
ТОПОР НОВОСТИ 2.0
@topornews77 · 33,412
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Цепная Реакция” (@vpelevin_misli), 14,036 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpelevin_misli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.