Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,356. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,231–25,993 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:41
24,434
-44
17 Sept 2026, 00:01
24,478
-55
14 Sept 2026, 23:17
24,533
-65
13 Sept 2026, 10:38
24,598
-33
11 Sept 2026, 16:17
24,631
-62
9 Sept 2026, 01:38
24,693
-105
5 Sept 2026, 17:59
24,798
-47
3 Sept 2026, 18:16
24,845
-46
2 Sept 2026, 08:17
24,891
-40
1 Sept 2026, 08:26
24,931
-43
31 Aug 2026, 04:49
24,974
-42
30 Aug 2026, 03:09
25,016
-28
29 Aug 2026, 03:13
25,044
-25
28 Aug 2026, 03:25
25,069
-15
27 Aug 2026, 05:27
25,084
-28
26 Aug 2026, 06:53
25,112
-34
25 Aug 2026, 09:15
25,146
-41
24 Aug 2026, 06:03
25,187
-50
22 Aug 2026, 14:23
25,237
-36
21 Aug 2026, 06:24
25,273
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 24,434 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,330
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
44 (20 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
63,320
Reactions total
993
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5,308 reactions across 44 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
954
18.0%
❤
754
14.2%
💊
530
9.98%
😁
476
8.97%
🤯
344
6.48%
🔥
278
5.24%
💔
263
4.95%
👍
260
4.90%
😭
259
4.88%
🤨
195
3.67%
😱
191
3.60%
🙏
189
3.56%
🤔
174
3.28%
🍾
110
2.07%
😐
46
0.867%
❤🔥
44
0.829%
🥰
42
0.791%
👏
32
0.603%
👀
26
0.49%
🎉
21
0.396%
16 further kinds
120
2.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 44 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vpnspacevprogram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚠️ Ночью РКН устроил масштабную атаку на свободный интернет
Из-за новых ограничений часть наших серверов временно была недоступна.
Сейчас инфраструктура уже восстановлена, сервисы работают в штатном режиме. Мы продолжаем отслеживать ситуацию и оперативно реагировать на любые новые инциденты.
Спасибо, что вы с нами ❤️
🍂 Не успели оформить подписку к осени?
Тогда ловите последний шанс — скидка 30% на VPN Space до конца дня.
Используйте промокод LAST при покупке или продлении подписки и успейте оформить всё выгоднее 🚀
⏳ Только сегодня
✅ Работа серверов и оплаты восстановлена
Неполадки на стороне хостинг-провайдера устранены. Серверы и система оплаты снова работают в штатном режиме.
Спасибо за ожидание и понимание ❤️
⚠️ Временные неполадки в работе
На стороне нашего хостинг-провайдера сейчас наблюдается сбой. Из-за этого некоторые серверы временно недоступны, а оплата может работать с перебоями.
Наша команда уже работает над восстановлением всех сервисов. Спасибо за понимание ❤️
🚀VPN SPACE
🌎Наш сайт
👍Отзывы
🗞Новостной канал
❗️ Россиян предложили отучать от VPN
В Госдуме заявили, что VPN может быть опасен и особенно негативно влиять на молодёжь.
По словам депутата, через такие сервисы пользователи могут попасть в те части интернета, доступ к которым государство стремится ограничить
❗️ Приложения «Лукойл» и Teboil пропали из App Store
Скачать их больше не получится — ни через поиск, ни по прямой ссылке. Официальных причин пока нет.
Пользователям рекомендуют сохранить уже установленное приложение и отключить его автоматическую выгрузку
⚡️ Википедия стала недоступна в России
Пользователи из разных регионов жалуются, что сайт Википедии не открывается.
Причины проблем пока не сообщаются. При этом доступ сохраняется через сервисы обхода блокировок.
⚡️ В России начали ограничивать Google и Cloudflare DNS
Эксперты фиксируют блокировки защищённых DNS-протоколов DoH и DoT у абонентов «Ростелекома», «Дом.ру», SkyNet и «Билайна».
При таких ограничениях браузеры и приложения могут переходить на обычный DNS провайдера. Тогда запросы снова становятся видимыми оператору, а ограничивать доступ к сайтам становится проще
❗️ Roblox массово перестал открываться в России
Игроки жалуются на проблемы с доступом к Roblox — не работают ни приложение, ни сайт, подключиться к серверам не получается.
Всего за несколько минут на сервисах мониторинга появились сотни сообщений о сбое
⚡️ Приложения Ozon вернулись в Google Play
В магазине снова доступны приложение маркетплейса, Ozon Travel и сервисы для продавцов. Часть приложений компании пока остаётся на модерации.
Напомним, 15 августа приложения Ozon удалили из Google Play. Предположительно, причиной стали санкции против «Ozon Банка».
⚠️ ИИ будет искать иноагентов в текстах
В Челябинске разработали систему, способную проверять документы на упоминания иноагентов, экстремистов и нежелательных организаций.
Алгоритм сопоставит текст с государственными базами и подготовит отчёт. Финальный вердикт при этом останется за специалистом
⚡️ Telegram замаскирует прокси-трафик под обычный веб
В десктопной версии Telegram тестируется схема с HTTPS и WebSocket. Соединение будет выглядеть как обычный трафик сайта, внутри которого скрывается MTProxy.
На серверной стороне поток разделят и перенаправят дальше, а сам домен при обычном открытии продолжит показывать веб-страницу.
Так отличить трафик Telegram от обычного посещения сайта станет заметно сложнее
🔥133❤20🥰12❤🔥5🙏3💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @vpnspacevprogram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vpn Space Новости” (@vpnspacevprogram), 24,434 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpnspacevprogram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.