Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,897–5,076 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 12:22
4,980
-20
13 Sept 2026, 02:00
5,000
-6
9 Sept 2026, 06:57
5,006
-29
4 Sept 2026, 00:19
5,035
-20
31 Aug 2026, 05:35
5,055
+84
27 Aug 2026, 23:43
4,971
-8
25 Aug 2026, 02:34
4,979
-4
21 Aug 2026, 11:37
4,983
-3
18 Aug 2026, 11:02
4,986
+68
15 Aug 2026, 16:15
4,918
-15
12 Aug 2026, 14:18
4,933
-13
9 Aug 2026, 14:13
4,946
-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:50
4,948
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:48
4,949
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:13
4,949
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
335 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
133
39.7%
😁
92
27.5%
❤
69
20.6%
😢
22
6.57%
🔥
16
4.78%
👍
2
0.597%
custom 5350369253163804124
1
0.299%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если и начинать неделю с публикации на канале, то лучше примера не найти)😏
В Навои хокимият прям активно применяет высокие технологии для решения проблем (своих)
Да, эти гении использовали ИИ-обработку для отчета о проделанной работе по благоустройству махалли, но не учли, что ИИ-шка может, к примеру, дорисовывать деревья, да и если присмотреться, то кучу других артефактов легко можно заметить.
😅
#отподписчика
@v…
ТОП-5 ответов на «У ВАС ДОРОГО».
Применять на свой страх и риск, я тут не причастен, просто делюсь с вами скриншотами какого-то Андрея
@vsebudethorosho
Свежий проект продакшн-студии AI-BUDET в совместке с LUNAR.
Все актёры были сняты в павильоне, а локации и окружение созданы с помощью AI. Такой подход позволил реализовать несколько разных сюжетов и визуальных сцен без съёмок на реальных объектах, что позволило оптимизировать смету на производство с бескомпромиссным реализмом.
Чтобы понять, как это работает, сделали сплит-экран: как снималось и как в итоге получил…
Короче, ребята, перед выходными я вам тут принес лучший бурятский сериал из Тик-тока🤣😍
Меня ппц разрывает от этих видосов, и я не могу с вами этим не поделиться. Уверен, кому-то из вас попадались эти видео, тк у них миллионы просмотров, но я выбрал лучшее😅
Доставайте тетрадочку, чтобы записывать все крылатые выражения. И да, в видео ОЧЕНЬ МНОГО МАТА. Я предупредил. Но это разрывные серии, обязательно посмотрите🤣ну …
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @vsebudethorosho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
16
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
16
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vsebudethorosho named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@and1_x_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@aselya_id named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@bekha__04 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@bonurakhmatova_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@davaygromche_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@goldvisionrental named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@imbogdvn named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@luizayunusovaaa named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@magistral_rentals named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@malichavangard named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@milena11yun named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@nilufer named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@perfect named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@pro__playback named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@ps_davron_1080 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@sarvar_sobirov_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бизнес Факты 2.0 @facts2_0 · 32,948 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
Эффект Макаренко @makarenko_channel · 36,030 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
По ходу разберёмся @pohodu_media · 28,230 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
Creative Asia @we_project · 72,367 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Afisha.uz - Все события Ташкента @afishauz · 32,854 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
Spot.uz – бизнес и технологии @spotuz · 26,833 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Repost.uz @RepostUZ · 91,198 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
ANONS.uz @anonsuz · 29,186 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
Kapital.uz @KPTLUZ · 22,326 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Эхо Узбекистана @ExoUzbekistana · 24,504 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Потребитель.Уз @potrebitel_uz · 38,672 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Gazeta.uz - Новости Узбекистана @gazetauz · 86,091 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
UzNews.uz @uznews · 70,784 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
Tashkent_Land @Tashkent_Land · 33,932 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЩА ВСЁ БУДЕТ😼” (@vsebudethorosho), 4,980 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsebudethorosho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.