Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VELIAL SQUAD

Channel

VELIAL SQUAD

@vsquad

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

21,446subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001189513847
TypeChannel
Username@vsquad
Created17 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vsquad

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,34021,44621,3937 August 2026 — 21,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,357 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,370 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,372 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,374 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,371 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,375 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,376 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,377 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,375 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,379 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,372 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,369 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,365 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,364 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,363 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,361 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,354 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,358 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,361 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,363 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,355 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,341 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,340 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,345 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,357 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,359 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,358 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,356 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,362 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,370 subscribers24 September 2026 — 21,365 subscribers3 October 2026 — 21,356 subscribers8 October 2026 — 21,354 subscribers12 October 2026 — 21,370 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,377 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,375 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,380 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,383 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,396 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,414 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,421 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,437 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,446 subscribers7 August 202622 October 2026
44 measurements spanning 77 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,324–21,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 18:1621,446+9
21 Oct 2026, 11:4821,437+16
20 Oct 2026, 11:3021,421+7
19 Oct 2026, 11:0921,414+18
18 Oct 2026, 09:5421,396+13
17 Oct 2026, 11:1621,383+3
16 Oct 2026, 13:4721,380+5
15 Oct 2026, 15:2821,375-2
14 Oct 2026, 11:5021,377+7
12 Oct 2026, 20:1821,370+16
8 Oct 2026, 06:5621,354-2
3 Oct 2026, 17:3921,356-9
24 Sept 2026, 23:3821,365-5
18 Sept 2026, 15:3721,370+8
16 Sept 2026, 08:1721,362+6
14 Sept 2026, 13:4121,356-2
13 Sept 2026, 02:1821,358-1
11 Sept 2026, 04:2221,359+2
8 Sept 2026, 07:1721,357+12
5 Sept 2026, 00:5721,345first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 21,446 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026
Posts held83 (14 July 2026 – 10 October 2026)
Views total190,030
Reactions total6,712
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 34s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

21,443 reactions across 83 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 543170524787141507421,443100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
741
across the posts below
Posts paid on
50
of 83 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
122
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vsquad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 10 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC≈3,470 views378 reactions13 Starsread 12 October 2026

=альбом записан= опп описан 😎

custom 5431705247871415074378

10 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈3,500 views305 reactions2 Starsread 12 October 2026

всё.

custom 5431705247871415074305

10 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈3,550 views340 reactions4 Starsread 12 October 2026

крипшоу2 это пиздец

custom 5431705247871415074340

10 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈3,510 views287 reactions5 Starsread 12 October 2026

не буду пиздеть

custom 5431705247871415074287

9 Oct 2026, 09:08 UTC≈4,030 views174 reactions3 Starsread 12 October 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 5431705247871415074174

9 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC≈3,990 views132 reactionsread 12 October 2026

https://youtu.be/JaNOv1BUHT4?si=N_P-5WzhGNgl1D1H

custom 5431705247871415074132

9 Oct 2026, 06:08 UTC≈4,040 views166 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

яндекс музыка

custom 5431705247871415074166

8 Oct 2026, 21:29 UTC≈4,170 views248 reactions1 Starread 12 October 2026

буду благодарен за поддержку в сторис, репостами комментариями и подпеваниями 🖤🪱 🌚крипшоускоро

custom 5431705247871415074248

8 Oct 2026, 21:28 UTC≈4,230 views111 reactionsread 12 October 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5431705247871415074111

8 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC≈4,910 views265 reactions17 Starsread 12 October 2026
Photo

VELIAL SQUAD - черви послушать на площадках музыка: fonky’fake , paperpiece запись/сведение: MotelBlack обложка: drksh CREEPSHOW 2 …

custom 5431705247871415074265

8 Oct 2026, 20:00 UTC≈4,330 views204 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

червивый трек через час

custom 5431705247871415074204

8 Oct 2026, 15:43 UTC≈4,690 views113 reactionsread 12 October 2026

🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱

custom 5431705247871415074113

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @vsquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTCAnonymous Poll2,340 voters approx.

Какие футболки вам нравятся больше?

  1. из легкого дышащего хлопка (190-200 гр)37%
  2. более плотная ткань, которая держит форму (230 гр и выше)70%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q65149841 on Wikidata, read 18 October 2026
LabelVelial Squad
YouTubeUClgDm4JOU2soWOukjXGTnKw

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VELIAL SQUAD” (@vsquad), 21,446 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsquad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.