Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1926МЫСЛИ

Channel

1926МЫСЛИ

@vulfcanseeyou

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,813subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374133845
TypeChannel
Username@vulfcanseeyou
Descriptionпрофессиональный щитпостинг декмы из агонии aka а что значит 1926? https://linktr.ee/dekmadekma
Created14 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vulfcanseeyou

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,81211,88511,848.56 August 2026 — 11,820 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,820 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,819 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,812 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,813 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,855 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,853 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,854 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,864 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,865 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,885 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,883 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,880 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,874 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,870 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,871 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,867 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,861 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,866 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,865 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,867 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,865 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,866 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,864 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,838 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,836 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,834 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,836 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,841 subscribers2 October 2026 — 11,834 subscribers7 October 2026 — 11,825 subscribers11 October 2026 — 11,831 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,827 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,825 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,824 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,822 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,823 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,824 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,822 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,821 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,820 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,824 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,827 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,820 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,823 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,827 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,829 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,830 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,826 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,821 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,823 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,821 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,816 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,818 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,816 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,813 subscribers11,8136 August 20268 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 94 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,801–11,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 13:0611,813-3
7 Nov 2026, 03:3511,816-2
6 Nov 2026, 06:1911,818+2
5 Nov 2026, 07:4811,816-5
4 Nov 2026, 04:5511,821-2
2 Nov 2026, 01:3811,823+2
1 Nov 2026, 02:2111,821-5
31 Oct 2026, 00:5411,826-4
29 Oct 2026, 23:0911,830+1
28 Oct 2026, 21:4811,829+2
27 Oct 2026, 23:1611,827+4
26 Oct 2026, 22:2711,823+3
25 Oct 2026, 20:0811,820-7
24 Oct 2026, 21:1511,827+3
23 Oct 2026, 20:2711,824+4
22 Oct 2026, 18:1711,820-1
21 Oct 2026, 10:5711,821-1
20 Oct 2026, 06:3411,822-2
19 Oct 2026, 03:5811,824+1
18 Oct 2026, 07:3011,823first reading

Engagement

200 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 11,813 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,850
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
61
of 200 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held200 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total234,630
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 20:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,990
Videos
≈642
Links
≈1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 03:36 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 8 November 2026

если карлик покурит шмали может ли он быть высоко

7 Nov 2026, 23:13 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 8 November 2026

блблблблбл брбрбобобрбрбрб

7 Nov 2026, 02:51 UTC≈3,810 viewsread 8 November 2026

мне кажется быть гангстером и умереть от взрыва машины ну просто охуенно

6 Nov 2026, 21:21 UTC≈3,580 viewsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @pechenka_codex

Пирокинезис из Бутусово сидел в тюрьме за то что убил жирного уёбка из ворониных

6 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC≈3,830 viewsread 8 November 2026

в отношениях ты ни дом ни саб потому что ты ебаный бомж и бассов у тебя нихуя нет

6 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @sh3hcoPhoto

TALL MAN MIXTAPE (final teaser) СМОТРЕТЬ cut: sh3hcod shot: ТОШ ⬆️13.11 - 13.11 - 13.11⬆️

5 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC≈3,880 viewsread 8 November 2026

честно лучше себе переломать каждый палец по отдельности молотком чем пытаться учиться сводить рок

Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @vulfcanseeyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

разговариваешь сам с собой?

  1. часто62%
  2. иногда32%
  3. нет6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Хакер в рекаХ🤌
@XAKEPxmm · 22
3 posts
барабашки и похуй // Л.ЯЙЦА
@deadhexissmiling · 22
3 posts
дом слендермена бля
@miulinns · 48
3 posts
модерация улиц
@citaisdead · 30
2 posts
щитджанки
@kittycankillyou · 23
2 posts
люхмед эта кто
@lqmiexdshitpost · 41
2 posts
вайсстип
@vaissteep · 54
2 posts
Канал | SMOKING SWAG
@PechenkiEEE · 24
1 post
༒ashtray༒
@ashtray_31 · 120
1 post
карди
@cardialtwo · 52
1 post
дизайр 21
@dezire2121 · 47
1 post
【 Название 】
@dhsuejksk · 54
1 post
12 core
@dstrdstrdstr · 52
1 post
ᅠ ᅠ
@edwardemo · 5
1 post
просто ли́са
@ewione · 230
1 post
ЧВК "PLAGUE" #444 #GRUZ2083
@fgbxplague · 115
1 post
кишки яндере щитпост
@gutwiredshitpost · 36
1 post
Vvvv
@inkst1gate · 21
1 post
@ireepshawty #dyingklan
@ireepshawty · 229
1 post
k1rr 🧱 [16+]
@k1rr_p · 37
1 post
некроз мозга
@killing_a_puppy · 50
1 post
killpost.txt // 🎱
@killpost_txt · 31
1 post
ахуренть☃️
@lyohaeblan · 250
1 post
MERZSKAYA
@merzskaya70s · 92
1 post
электрический щитпост
@mybrainispoisonous · 196
1 post
нетян, удали!
@netyan_ydali · 432
1 post
отрицание от™
@otrecanieoi · 124
1 post
#кошмары изгоя
@pariahshit · 48
1 post
паблик про юникорнов 🦎
@polovoi_akt · 12
1 post
strangled remvins
@remvins_askmedie · 80
1 post
Ресалтич мысли 18+ 19+ 20+
@resaltich · 8
1 post
дозость
@shipostdose · 49
1 post
мудак бляпост
@shizoash · 29
1 post
GENNAD’EVI4
@shizomattsaiz · 129
1 post
Сосал твои призраки УЁБИЩЕ
@sosaltvoigubi · 19
1 post
святой источник*
@sviatoi_istochnik · 29
1 post
SXMON
@sxXMON · 92
1 post
ТЫ ОФИГЕВШИЙ ВЭНЧИК?
@vanillavanchik · 41
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1926МЫСЛИ” (@vulfcanseeyou), 11,813 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vulfcanseeyou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.