Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for وَهَج

Channel

وَهَج

@vuup04

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,118subscribers

-312 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001977457693
TypeChannel
Username@vuup04
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vuup04

Growth

8,1188,4308,2747 August 2026 — 8,430 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,430 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,423 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,388 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,353 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,318 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,286 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,242 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,201 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,162 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,118 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net -312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,071–8,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:048,118-44
31 Aug 2026, 07:048,162-39
27 Aug 2026, 23:558,201-41
24 Aug 2026, 14:588,242-44
20 Aug 2026, 19:078,286-32
17 Aug 2026, 12:298,318-35
14 Aug 2026, 08:388,353-35
11 Aug 2026, 02:448,388-35
8 Aug 2026, 09:418,423-7
7 Aug 2026, 19:018,430no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:548,430first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.775%
avg views ÷ 8,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.9
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held66 (31 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,894
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
125
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 66 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vuup04. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC16 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📚💔 مقتطفات من كتب وروايات رومانسية حزينة هل تبحثون عن أعمال أدبية تلمس قلوبكم بأحاسيسها العميقة؟ إليكم بعض الاقتراحات التي ستحث مشاعركم: ❤️ أحلام مستغانمي - ذاكرة الجسد: رحلة مؤلمة عبر الذكريات والأحاسيس. ❤️ نبضات القلوب – *أنيت فرانسن*: مجموعة من القصص القصيرة التي تعبر عن أصعب لحظات الحب. ❤️ الحب في زمن الكوليرا – *غابرييل غارسيا ماركيز*: تجربة مؤلمة عن الحب والشوق والانتظار. ✨ اقتباسات رومانسية تلامس القلوب: 1) "ه

27 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC31 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✨ اقتباسات ملهمة بصريّة ✨ هل تبحث عن تصاميم للاقتباسات يمكن مشاركتها على تيليجرام وإنستجرام؟ إليك بعض الأفكار: 📖 "الحياة ليست مجرد انتظار العاصفة، بل تعلم الرقص تحت المطر." 🌹 "كل لحظة تشعر فيها باليأس، تذكَّر أن الشمس تغرب دائماً ثم تشرق من جديد." 💬 "ليس من الخطأ أن تسقط، لكن الخطأ أن تبقى حيث أنت." هل لديك اقتباسات تود مشاركتها؟ شاركنا بها في التعليقات! #اقتباسات #إلهام #تصميمات_بصرية 📢 صُنع في Inside

26 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC41 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📸✨ تصاميم اقتباسات بصريّة! اليوم نقدم لكم مجموعة مُصمَّمة بعناية من الاقتباسات التي تلامس القلوب وتُعبر عن المشاعر. ❤️💬 كل صورة تحمل رسالة خاصة وملهمة يمكنكم مشاركتها مع أصدقائكم. اختاروا التصميم الذي يُشعروا برغبة في التعبير، وشاركوا النصوص القابلة للنسخ! 🍃 #اقتباسات #تصاميم #إلهام #مشاركة 📢 صُنع في Inside

25 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC52 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✨ تصاميم اقتباسات بصريّة قابلة للمشاركة! ✨ هل تبحثون عن طريقة لتعبروا عن مشاعركم أو أفكاركم من خلال اقتباسات ملهمة وجميلة؟ 💭💖 نقدم لكم مجموعة من الصور المصممة خصيصًا لتتناسب مع أنستجرام وتيليجرام ستوري، مع نصوص جذابة قابلة للنسخ! يسعدنا أن نراكم تشاركونها مع أصدقائكم! 🌟 ما هي الاقتباسات التي تودون أن تتضمنها؟ شاركونا أفكاركم! #اقتداءات #تصاميم_بصرية #مشاركة #إلهام 📢 صُنع في Inside

25 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC43 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

‏لا أحد يذكر شخصاً في دعائه، إلا وقد صدق حبه.🤍

24 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC51 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💌 اقتباسات من قصص حب صامتة هل لديك رسالة لم تُقال عن تجربة حب عميق مررت به؟✨ ندعوكم لمشاركة تجاربكم أو اقتباساتكم حول الحب الصامت، فكل كلمة قد تُلهم الآخرين وتجعلهم يشعرون بأن مشاعرهم صحيحة. 💭 "الحديث الذي لم يتم هو ثغرة عاطفية، قد تسدها بكلماتك" دعونا نخلق مساحة لتبادل هذه المشاعر ومشاركة قصصنا. ما هي اللحظة التي لا يمكن نسيانها؟🤍 #حب_صامت #قصص #تفاعل #مشاعر 📢 صُنع في Inside

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @vuup04. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Huks | ١٤٣٠
@iHuks · 78,188
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 18 August 2026
سَيَستَجيب
@mqmq1x · 85,056
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وَهَج” (@vuup04), 8,118 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vuup04.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.