Channel
@vvwvvar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
213subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003849563660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vvwvvar |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 28 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vvwvvar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 213 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 211 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 209 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 209 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 206 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
331 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418378033071417114 | 89 | 26.9% | |
| custom 5199908968167678971 | 85 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5463390690492843973 | 42 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5420503028270640771 | 41 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5201724764376298469 | 26 | 7.85% | |
| custom 5199620028537807630 | 25 | 7.55% | |
| custom 5431547506607548173 | 23 | 6.95% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
текила сансет под действиями веществ пытался осуществить прыжок какаду, но в неподходящий момент осознал, что совершил прыжок в серость… качество будет сожрано, а в комментариях я любезно расположу файлик, который вы сможете рассмотреть
custom 542050302827064077141
мне пока нече показывать. все какое-то такое сумбурное, дурацковые скетчи
custom 520172476437629846926
коммиш! я немножко выпала, потому что ездила в москву пробоваться поступать в вуз да и просто ходила бродила по всяким местам… в скором времени я созрею до прайс-листа нормального, но вы можете писать мне в личку @twar_wara
custom 541837803307141711437
такой вопрос побписичники! есть ли кто из москвы, кто пойдет на пикфест 26-го? мне тут идти не с кем….. 🌟🌟🌟
custom 543154750660754817323
я просто сделаю подборку с подриком #PortfolioDay
custom 519962002853780763025
решила немного поживописничать, подопытным стал оберин….
custom 541837803307141711452
я продолжаю экспериментировать с традишкой…нормальные арты скоро будут…честно…
custom 546339069049284397342
такое ещо
custom 519990896816767897142
отсканировала несколько психоделических разворотов из скекпука
custom 519990896816767897143
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @vvwvvar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vvvwvar” (@vvwvvar), 213 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vvwvvar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.