Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Максим Горбачев | Вышмат | Профиматика

Channel

Максим Горбачев | Вышмат | Профиматика

@vyshmath

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,819subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001917015841
TypeChannel
Username@vyshmath
DescriptionКурсы по Вышмату: https://vyshmath.ru Бот с полезными материалами: @vyshmath_bot Беседа канала: @vyshmath_chat Отзывы: @vyshmath_reviews Поддержка: @vyshmath_help Сотрудничество: @maksooonisheee Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3QvkUY
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vyshmath

Growth

15,77515,87115,8237 August 2026 — 15,867 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,850 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,846 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,871 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,857 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,817 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,796 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,779 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,775 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,791 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,781 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,791 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,810 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,821 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,842 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,849 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,856 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,847 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,836 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,811 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,819 subscribers15,8197 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,761–15,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 23:2515,819+8
29 Aug 2026, 00:0215,811-25
27 Aug 2026, 20:3615,836-11
26 Aug 2026, 17:4515,847-9
25 Aug 2026, 21:1615,856+7
24 Aug 2026, 23:5215,849+7
23 Aug 2026, 10:1315,842+21
22 Aug 2026, 00:2415,821+11
20 Aug 2026, 20:3415,810+19
19 Aug 2026, 19:4215,791+10
18 Aug 2026, 18:0715,781-10
17 Aug 2026, 20:3715,791+16
16 Aug 2026, 22:2415,775-4
15 Aug 2026, 16:1815,779-17
14 Aug 2026, 06:1915,796-21
12 Aug 2026, 22:2415,817-40
11 Aug 2026, 22:1315,857-14
10 Aug 2026, 23:5215,871+11
10 Aug 2026, 02:5215,860+14
9 Aug 2026, 00:5515,846first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 15,819 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,500
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held44 (2 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total198,100
Reactions total5,752
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,190
Videos
219
Links
515

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,752 reactions across 44 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1,09719.1%
🍌1,06018.4%
❤‍🔥63611.1%
5459.47%
😁5158.95%
🔥5038.74%
🤯3746.50%
custom 53976008066544533702203.82%
🥰1993.46%
🤔741.29%
🤣701.22%
👍570.991%
😍550.956%
😎540.939%
🫡400.695%
🖕350.608%
💔240.417%
😢240.417%
🌚210.365%
🐳210.365%
26 further kinds1282.23%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,752reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 44 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vyshmath. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,280 views646 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Ну что, господа абитуриенты и студенты, готовы к 1 сентября и началу учебного года? 🍓 - да 🍌 - нет

🍌429🍓192😢15💔3🫡3🎉21custom 53976008066544533701

28 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈3,950 views209 reactionsread 30 August 2026

ДЕМОВЕРСИЮ ВЫСШЕЙ МАТЕМАТИКИ НЕ ВЫКАТИЛИ 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

🤯155😁20🔥11😢83🤣3❤‍🔥2🗿2

27 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC≈4,470 views242 reactions10 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Одомашнили хомяка! Назвали Жориком Теперь не боится нас и даже шапочку позволяет надеть на него ахахах

🥰171😍26💘2011🔥6❤‍🔥3🐳3🤩2

27 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈4,080 views100 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Братцы, если бы я запускал совместный курс по Высшей математике с каким-то медийным преподавателем (по Вышмату), то с кем бы вы хотели видеть этот курс?)

🤔7112🤯6😎4🐳3🍓2🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈4,510 views73 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

РЕШЕНИЕ ДЛЯ РАСКРАСКИ 🪨 Вижу много классных решений и я невероятно рад, что вы так сильно включились. И самый кайф, что многие решили правильно Для тех кто не разобрался, давайте обсудим пару основных моментов по решению: • Цвет углов одинаковый: противоположные углы доски всегда имеют один и тот же цвет (например, оба белые). После их удаления на доске остаётся 30 белых и 32 чёрных клетки. • Свойство домино: люб

🍌41🍓234😎2❤‍🔥1🥰1😁1

26 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,770 views99 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

ШАХМАТЫ В МАТЕМАТИКЕ 🥺 Сегодня придумал для вас интересную задачу с шахматной доской для нашей рубрики: Вышмат Абитуриентам Задачка больше на логическое мышление, чем на высшую математику, но в вузе вам часто придется не просто использовать теорему «в лоб», а искать интересные и нетривиальные пути решения😐 Так что вперед прокачивать голову перед первым учебным днем, который уже совсем скоро 🍌- потопал решать 🍓 -

🍌48🍓30custom 539760080665445337010❤‍🔥4😎21💘1💩1

26 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈4,300 views36 reactionsread 30 August 2026

ИЩЕМ НАСТАВНИКОВ-ВЕДУЩИХ ЗАНЯТИЙ В МИНИ-ГРУППЕ / ВЕДУЩИХ ЗАНЯТИЙ В МИНИ-ГРУППЕ В КОМАНДУ ПРОФИМАТИКИ! Сдал(а) ЕГЭ по профильной математике на 90+ и хочешь поделиться своими знаниями с 11-классникам, чтобы они тоже прошли этот путь с максимальным кайфом? Нам нужен именно ТЫ! Наставник в Профиматике — это ментор и старший бро, который создает крутую атмосферу, поддерживает, когда опускаются руки, и ведет свою команду

❤‍🔥187🥰6🔥3🍓2

23 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈4,980 views153 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Кто-то уже прошел более 31 вебинара на нашем курсе по Вышмату для абитуриентов🤯🤯 Есть идеи, кто эта машина?

😁95🔥17custom 53976008066544533701511😎6🤣5🍾2👍1

19 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈7,580 views279 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Илья, мой брат и преподаватель по Высшей математике на курсе для Абитуриентов, сейчас отдыхает в Минске и снял для вас Вышматпародию на легендарное видео на том же месте, где и оригинал😎😎 Думаю, Илья превзошел оригинал и заслуживает кучу реакций!

❤‍🔥172😁46🔥2813🤣8🐳5🎉4👍2

19 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈6,080 views51 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

РЕШЕНИЕ РЕКУРРЕНТНОЙ ПОСЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬНОСТИ ❤️ Думаю для многих задача оказалась не очень простой и вызвала много вопросов на этапе размышлений над ходом решения, поэтому я бы размышлял так: Как вообще подступиться к такой задаче, где дана рекуррентная формула, а доказать нужно неравенство с корнем? Работать с иррациональностями не очень удобно. Поэтому давайте мы искусственно создадим удобную запись и перейдем к квадр

🍓28🍌14🔥52🍾1custom 53976008066544533701

19 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈4,930 views61 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

ЗАДАЧКА НА ПОСЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬНОСТЬ 😇 Сегодня подготовил для вас совершенно новую задачку для рубрики: Вышмат Абитуриентам, такого мы с вами еще не решали Что же нам нужно сделать? В задаче нам дана последовательность, которая задана рекуррентно двумя членами a_n и a_{n+1} соответственно То есть, нам дали закон, по которому у нас работает наш набор чиселок, который будет идти до сколь угодно большого номера И нам нужно

🍓29🍌233🖕3👾1🥰1😎1

18 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈4,960 views92 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Ребята, а есть кто-то сейчас в окрестности МФТИ (общага, корпус физтеха) и хочет посниматься в контенте математическом?) Напишите + в комментах, кто хочет

🔥65❤‍🔥15🥰84

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @vyshmath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 4,265 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Профиматика | ЕГЭ по Математике | Игорь Уколов и Влад Вуль
@profimatika · 40,908
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Максим Коваль. ЕГЭ по математике
@MO_EGE · 71,941
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Grand Exam - Арсений Филин
@grandexam_ege · 49,989
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Саня Эбонит | Физика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@sanyaebonit · 74,714
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Имаев Артём Флэш | Информатика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@flash_ege · 41,553
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Вика Ланская | Информатика ЕГЭ 2027 | ИнфаВикуся | Умскул
@infa_vikusya · 43,791
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
ШАГ | поступление в Университет
@stepbyshag · 70,970
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максим Горбачев | Вышмат | Профиматика” (@vyshmath), 15,819 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vyshmath.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.