подскажите, пожалуйста, когда книги о моде стали похожими на файлы эпштейна?

Channel
aokigahara
@waashh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002608600691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @waashh |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/waashh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 13 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoQrFhZj0nY
иногда рефлексия полезна — что удивительно, ведь самокопание обычно к добру не приводит; но все же. канал, начавшийся с любви, с желания что-то показать, поделиться, заставил о себе вспомнить, пролистать почти с самого начала, еще и напомнил о собственной наросшей черствости. и не хочу больше распыляться, перейду к сути: любите, дорогие. читайте и любите.
Photo, posted without a caption
самое разрушающее, парализующее в этой хрупкости — невозможность найти в себе силы действовать, ведь в чем есть смысл, если нет возможности надеяться на завтрашний день. впрочем, параноидальные предрассудки спасают в очень редких случаях. пора уйти в глушь, подальше от цивилизации, где условные атаки не будут мелькать в личном инфополе.
не хочется ощущать невероятную хрупкость всего, что окружает, — в том числе и своего существования. мира бы в мире дождаться.
«Резонно поставить вопрос: возможен ли хоть сколько-нибудь реалистический сценарий, где удовольствие не будет редуцировано к фетишу, посредством которого субъект вовлекается в процесс — или в движение — воспроизводства этого состояния, подобного «бесконечному ряду отражающихся друг в друге зеркал, в которых если что-то и живо по-настоящему, так это производство дефицита, потребности, причем дефицит этот компенсируетс…
https://bigthink.com/philosophy/how-ai-is-quietly-changing-what-we-think-the-human-mind-is/
«Главный признак перформатистского произведения состоит в том, что оно формальными средствами (per formam — через форму) заставляет нас в нечто поверить. В идеальном варианте такое произведение создает целостное, замкнутое пространство, в рамках которого возможно возникновение положительных идентификаций, влекущих за собой такие позитивные эмоции, как любовь, вера, смирение, доверие, искренность, ощущение трансценден…
“One of the problems with the internet as a source of information is that there is no end, no definitive conclusion to be reached. You travel link by link, pursuing digressions and counter-claims, interrupted by continuous breaking updates. The novel, by contrast, is a technology of orderly revelation, slowing and speeding time so as to trace connections and consequences down into hours, minutes, seconds, or out into…
https://bigthink.com/mini-philosophy/the-dali-trick-the-strange-psychology-of-becoming-who-you-want-to-be/
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/feb/28/the-lonely-city-olivia-laing-edward-hopper-andy-warhol
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @waashh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aokigahara” (@waashh), 13 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waashh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.