Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for willoozle

Channel

willoozle

@wakaaniki1

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

208subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002296928285
TypeChannel
Username@wakaaniki1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wakaaniki1

Previous handles

@wakaaniki1 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@wakaaniki1
held 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026

Growth

201210205.510 August 2026 — 201 subscribers10 August 2026 — 201 subscribers10 August 2026 — 203 subscribers17 August 2026 — 204 subscribers24 August 2026 — 210 subscribers31 August 2026 — 208 subscribers20810 August 202631 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 21 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 07:57208-2
24 Aug 2026, 19:17210+6
17 Aug 2026, 10:24204+1
10 Aug 2026, 10:01203+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:15201no change
10 Aug 2026, 05:02201first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 3 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53572800273417789463929.3%
❤‍🔥3727.8%
🥰2015.0%
💘1914.3%
custom 529904015913885773296.77%
custom 524461819473955355975.26%
custom 519067403686199277010.752%
custom 543836316443975337710.752%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC193 views48 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

МНЕ СЕДНЯ 22 ВЫКРУЧИВАНИЯ И ЕСЛИ ВЫ ХОТИТЕ МНЕ СДЕЛАТЬ ПОДАРОК МОЖЕТЕ РЕПОСТНУТЬ ЭТОТ ПОСТ:3🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

custom 535728002734177894622❤‍🔥13🥰8💘2custom 52990401591388577322custom 52446181947395535591

9 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC115 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

РЕБЯТА СЕГОДНЯ МНЕ ИСПОЛНЯТСЯ 22!!! и в честь этого хочу запостить джонкат который мне нарисовали самые лучшие люди в мире! ВСЕ ПРИГЛАШЕНЫ НА ВЕЧЕРИНКУ!! ЕСЛИ КТОТ ЕЩЕ ДОКИНЕТ КАРТИНКИ Я ИХ ПОПОЗЖЕ ВЫЛОЖУ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 всем большое спасибо!!! вот каналы авторов https://t.me/artmanual https://t.me/nvsuckbigcccc https://t.me/ketsuchan4 https://t.me/morgansgrimoire https://t.me/menttcha https://t.me/FsFicmyself https://t.…

custom 535728002734177894617🥰10custom 52990401591388577327💘4custom 54383631644397533771

9 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC139 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

крис но у меня поплыли мозги

❤‍🔥24💘13custom 52446181947395535596🥰2custom 51906740368619927701

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @wakaaniki1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“willoozle” (@wakaaniki1), 208 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wakaaniki1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.