Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Waled Faozi | سؤال اليوم

Channel

Waled Faozi | سؤال اليوم

@waledfaozi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,645subscribers

+850 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561835119
TypeChannel
Username@waledfaozi
Descriptionسؤال منكم وإليكم لنتشارك تجارب الحياة فكرة القناة t.me/waledfaozi/3 للتواصل او الإعلان t.me/WaledFaoziBot لدعم المحتوى t.me/waledfaozi/606
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/waledfaozi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,7956,6456,2206 August 2026 — 5,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,797 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,819 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,850 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,888 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,905 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,938 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,949 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,093 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,145 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,150 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,185 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,199 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,214 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,295 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,346 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,379 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,409 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,426 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,464 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,489 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,529 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,569 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,606 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,645 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,668–6,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 09:556,645+39
2 Nov 2026, 02:386,606+37
29 Oct 2026, 22:116,569+40
27 Oct 2026, 06:156,529+40
24 Oct 2026, 16:276,489+25
21 Oct 2026, 13:586,464+38
18 Oct 2026, 16:146,426+17
15 Oct 2026, 15:286,409+30
12 Oct 2026, 08:556,379+33
5 Oct 2026, 09:376,346+51
27 Sept 2026, 08:566,295+81
18 Sept 2026, 08:576,214+15
13 Sept 2026, 18:566,199+14
10 Sept 2026, 00:006,185+35
4 Sept 2026, 15:226,150+5
31 Aug 2026, 20:346,145+52
28 Aug 2026, 20:126,093+144
25 Aug 2026, 15:375,949+11
22 Aug 2026, 15:025,938+33
19 Aug 2026, 07:355,905first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.96%
avg views ÷ 6,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
529
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
27
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held54 (26 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total14,273
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Videos
1
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC73 viewsread 7 November 2026

من مجهول: ما الصفة التي تحترمها كثيرًا في الآخرين وتتمنى أن تنتشر بين الناس؟

6 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC147 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

ما أصعب عادة حاولت تركها؟

  1. السهر47%
  2. الجوال19%
  3. التسويف16%
  4. الأكل غير الصحي19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC211 viewsread 7 November 2026

من مجهول: كيف يمكن للإنسان أن يتعلم الصبر في زمن اعتاد فيه الناس الحصول على كل شيء بسرعة؟

5 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC229 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

أي نوع من الكتب تفضل؟

  1. تطوير الذات21%
  2. الروايات24%
  3. التاريخ والسير24%
  4. الدين والفكر30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC277 viewsread 7 November 2026

من مجهول: برأيك، ما الذي يجعل الإنسان يكرر الخطأ نفسه رغم معرفته بعواقبه؟

4 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC297 viewsread 7 November 2026

من مجهول : كيف اتخلص من الخوف الي في داخلى وأكون شخص اقوى في داخلي؟

4 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC303 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

كيف تتعامل مع المشكلة غالبًا؟

  1. أواجهها فورًا49%
  2. أفكر فيها طويلًا27%
  3. أستشير أحدًا15%
  4. أؤجلها10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC411 viewsread 7 November 2026

من مجهول: ما النصيحة التي كنت تتمنى أن تسمعها في بداية حياتك العملية؟

3 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC421 viewsread 7 November 2026

كيف التخلص من التوتر اثناء التحدث في المسرح

3 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC408 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

ما الذي يحفزك أكثر للاستمرار؟

  1. رؤية النتائج45%
  2. تشجيع من حولي5%
  3. الخوف من الفشل17%
  4. شغفي بما أفعل33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC439 viewsread 7 November 2026

من مجهول: كيف يمكن للإنسان أن يميّز بين حاجته الحقيقية للراحة وبين تأجيل مسؤولياته؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @waledfaozi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

ما أصعب عادة حاولت تركها؟

  1. السهر47%
  2. الجوال19%
  3. التسويف16%
  4. الأكل غير الصحي19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

أي نوع من الكتب تفضل؟

  1. تطوير الذات21%
  2. الروايات24%
  3. التاريخ والسير24%
  4. الدين والفكر30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

كيف تتعامل مع المشكلة غالبًا؟

  1. أواجهها فورًا49%
  2. أفكر فيها طويلًا27%
  3. أستشير أحدًا15%
  4. أؤجلها10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

ما الذي يحفزك أكثر للاستمرار؟

  1. رؤية النتائج45%
  2. تشجيع من حولي5%
  3. الخوف من الفشل17%
  4. شغفي بما أفعل33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

متى تكون في أفضل حالاتك الذهنية؟

  1. الصباح الباكر44%
  2. الظهر4%
  3. المساء7%
  4. آخر الليل45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

ما أكثر شيء يسرق وقتك يوميًا؟

  1. السوشال ميديا51%
  2. التفكير الزائد31%
  3. التسويف13%
  4. أشخاص وارتباطات لا تفيدني5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ثقف نفسك √
@XGHHH · 118,072
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
مجرة الأنمي - Anime Galaxy
@Anime1Galaxy · 43,996
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Waled Faozi | سؤال اليوم” (@waledfaozi), 6,645 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waledfaozi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.