Channel
@waleraclownn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003900226342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @waleraclownn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/waleraclownn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 51 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 49 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 46 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 41 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 40 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 33 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 33 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
40 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 57.5% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 22.5% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Довольно интересный вопрос. «Есть ли у тебя ассоциации кого-то из LPS с реальными людьми? (У меня, например, ООАК волка от Пилимоники ассоциируется с Шастуном) Если да, то хотелось бы посмотреть на них (с фото! :D» Ассоциаций именно со знаменитостями нет, но вот с моими близкими да. Например, эта кошка #1231 напоминает мне мою подругу @marifuerna , тк это ее маскот - Эвелина. Так же у меня есть в коллекции волчок #…
❤🔥4
Думаю эти два вопроса можно объединить в один. «Есть ли фавориты и сколько? Что их объединяет или какие есть воспоминания связанные с ними ?» «Какой твой топ 5 любимых лпс (с местами)?» 1 место - сиам, моя единственная оригинальная стоячка, которую я давно хотела, он и некий маскот канала. 2 место - два бультерьера, кого то одного не смогла поставить. Люблю эту породу в жизни, хотела бы и завести себе, но пока что т…
❤🔥3❤1
А вот и Вопрос - ответ! 1. Вопрос. «Какая волна тебе нравится больше всего?» Если речь идет о новом поколении (G7), то наверное 1,2,3 серии, тк там много фигурок нейтральных цветов.
❤🔥3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4❤🔥3💘2
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🩸🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🩸 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩 🕯Подписка на канал 🕯 Репост этой записи в свой открытый канал от 10 участников или трем друзьям 🕯Порядковый номер в комментарии + прикрепленные скриншоты репоста в канал/друзьям 🕯Важно: удалять репост до окончания розыгрыша нельзя 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✝️ALPHERATZ ✝️ base: 3D чепец на липучках, идет в комплекте END: 26.08.26 в 19:00 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☑️Следите за своими номерами. Но…
💘2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥6❤3💘2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥4💘2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @waleraclownn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“waleraclown|collection” (@waleraclownn), 51 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waleraclownn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.