Channel
@wallstreetplays
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001893289446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wallstreetplays |
| Description | Im am not the average caller, if you stick to me you gonna make it if you try to fud or scam me you gonna get rekt. I am starting my journey now with zero influence but a lot of knowledge. Owner @Based_Yusuf |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 24 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wallstreetplays |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 1 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2022 to 15 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
FLOKI Buy! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 Spent: 75.67 BNB ($19,923.25) Got: 1,809,611,247.11 FLOKI Buyer Position: 🆕 New! DEX: PancakeSwap Price: 0.00000004182 BNB ($0.00001101) MarketCap: $102,584,688 TX | Buy | Chart | Vote | Trending
Im so fucking bullish on floki, seriously I consider launching a baby floki.
FLOKI Buy! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 Spent: 55.83 BNB ($14,782.56) Got: 1,386,875,072.41 FLOKI Buyer Position: 🆕 New! DEX: PancakeSwap Price: 0.00000004026 BNB ($0.00001066) MarketCap: $99,315,031 TX | Buy | Chart | Vote | Trending
What you all think about that?
Even tho Morocco won its still sad to see Ronaldo getting knocked out of the world cup it doesn’t matter if you are a Messi fan or whatever this is an end of era😢
I am super excited to watch Morocco vs Portugal i think it will be a tough game but eventually Portugal will win, portugal squad is deeper then Morocco thats the only reason they will win. What your guess for the game?
What A GAME.
Wow 😯 Croatia knocked out fucking brazil this is unbelievable not what I expected tbh
Someone got a project he think its worth aping to? If you do shill it in the comments down below
I want you guys to understand something, unfortunately this space is full of shit so finding the gem is like finding a needle in a haystack im always trying my best to give you guys the best call i can but thats really hard so unfortunately some of you going to lose money on some of my calls, after all there is no wins without loss. Im always here trying to do my best and whenever someone loss money on a call that i…
❤4
Just launched and i think its going to do good, ill ape a bag. Max bag is 10000000 https://t.me/+zwcMwUsxQDYzZDM8
Lfg Moroccoooooooooo 🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦
🍾2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wallstreetplays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wallstreetplays named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WallStreet plays” (@wallstreetplays), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallstreetplays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.