Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for стены рушатся

Channel

стены рушатся

@wallswillfall

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

420subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003847622108
TypeChannel
Username@wallswillfall
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 10 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wallswillfall

Growth

377420398.56 August 2026 — 377 subscribers6 August 2026 — 382 subscribers6 August 2026 — 382 subscribers13 August 2026 — 396 subscribers19 August 2026 — 404 subscribers25 August 2026 — 416 subscribers2 September 2026 — 420 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 28 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 371–426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 19:37420+4
25 Aug 2026, 17:34416+12
19 Aug 2026, 08:47404+8
13 Aug 2026, 06:54396+14
6 Aug 2026, 20:17382no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:14382+5
6 Aug 2026, 03:21377first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2633.8%
💘1722.1%
🔥1519.5%
💋79.09%
👎56.49%
👍22.60%
👨‍💻22.60%
🌚11.30%
👏11.30%
🤔11.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC140 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

тюрьмы и полиция вредят людям и подлежат упразднению. звучит вызывающе? но пару веков назад точно так же звучала идея отмены рабства аболиционист·ки предлагают демонтаж таких систем. тюремный аболиционизм/prison industrial complex (PIC) abolitionism — движение за отказ от института лишения свободы ~ на первой встрече про аболиционизм (7 августа) поговорим об идеях Кропоткина, Мариам Кабы и Анджелы Дэвис, а также об

6🔥6🌚1🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👨‍💻2

3 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC177 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ответили на все сообщения в боте, проверяйте переписку с @wallswillfallbot ! если вы заполняли форму, но не получили ответа — пожалуйста, напишите в бот ещё раз / стены уже рушатся

💋71

21 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC≈7,400 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

мир без тюрем: три встречи про аболиционизм we don't act like cops — так звучит название коллектива, в коллабе с которым мы проводим серию встреч в этот раз. по словам участн·иц, название нашего коллектива переводится как «мы не поступаем друг с другом как менты». то есть отказываемся от логики контроля и принуждения, насилия и власти одного над другим. мы считаем, что гуманных тюрем не бывает, а пенитенциарная си

💘179👎5🔥5👏1

10 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC589 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

более 30 участн·иц, 33 тысячи рублей в поддержку политзаключённых и ценные знания — итоги интенсива по безопасности. листайте карточки! ~ уже начинаем готовить новую серию встречь. на этот раз будем думать про мир без тюрем. stay tuned ~ / безопасность разрушает стены

10🔥4👍2

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @wallswillfall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“стены рушатся” (@wallswillfall), 420 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallswillfall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.