Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Калибр 3.5

Channel

Калибр 3.5

@wandam11ch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,812subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116114248
TypeChannel
Username@wandam11ch
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wandam11ch

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7731,8121,792.57 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,781 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,777 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,784 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,810 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,812 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 39 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,767–1,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 14:391,812+2
2 Sept 2026, 20:361,810+11
30 Aug 2026, 23:521,799+10
27 Aug 2026, 20:541,789-2
24 Aug 2026, 12:561,791+7
20 Aug 2026, 18:541,784+7
15 Aug 2026, 11:331,777-4
12 Aug 2026, 00:321,781+8
7 Aug 2026, 20:491,773no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,773first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 52s
Average length
3m 14s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22776.2%
❤‍🔥237.72%
🔥155.03%
👍93.02%
🥰93.02%
👎41.34%
💋41.34%
31.01%
💘20.671%
👏10.336%
💊10.336%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wandam11ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC307 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔥300кг 1х1 ✔️Самое интересное - сравнение. Того, как я тянул два месяца назад, и сейчас. В данный момент я тяну на ебанной резине - и конечно же создается дикое трение, из-за чего я просто трачу силы на срыв, очень тяжелый срыв, прям чувствуется, как диски трутся о ебанную резину. Поэтому и говорят, что мягкий гриф - ковролин. ➡️И два месяца назад - супер хард Хочется прям найти обувь норм и попробовать вернуться

14🥰2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC476 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как и просили - держите вторую часть ОЦЕНКУ ЖИМОВ ПОДПИСЧИКОВ Если хотите еще - ❤️ Скидывайте планы тренировок, технику приседа жима, тяги - все чекну

❤‍🔥136

5 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC578 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

210кг 3х1, делал с остановкой. Но хочется еще дольше потом паузу держать, прям буду стараться Выводы делайте дальше) За 220 с остановкой нужно побороться, это прям то, что мне нужно для помоста. Пока что меня радует все! Вес стабильно 123-124, толком даже не ем, так, на салатиках сижу и кока колу зиро За жим лайк ставьте, хули, постарался - ❤️

293🥰3💋1

5 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC613 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Жим 210 rpe 7 с паузой го? - ❤️ Главное не перепутать, и случайно не пожать 220...

66❤‍🔥6👍4💘2💋1

4 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC668 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlKd9YGwi9Q&feature=youtu.be Держите и поддержите пожалуйста, чет проснулся, с мотивацией видео записать - решил - сделал ❤️❤️

🔥132

4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC627 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хотите видео на ютуб? в часов 13? Буду философствовать на 20 минут на тему целеустремленности

  1. ебашь71%
  2. ждем41%
  3. свой ответ8%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC664 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

✔️310кг х 2 🔥День не однозначный, вчера заметил прям как фокус был потерян и отвлекался на всякие мелочи, в прочем был раздраженным. ❓Ожидания от тренировки целый день - дали о себе знать, в моменте просто устал и попросту ничего не хотелось делать Еще когда ехал в спортзал - была адская жара, в самом спортзале еще хуже, было невероятно плохо. Было 32 градуса, для меня было - вызовом, это лишь чуть чуть размазыв

14❤‍🔥2🥰2

3 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC643 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📌ОФП для пауэрлифтера: лишняя нагрузка или фундамент прогресса? 🔥Иногда можно услышать, что профессиональному лифтеру не нужна ОФП: достаточно приседать, жать и тянуть. Но на практике сильнейшие атлеты не ограничиваются только соревновательной тройкой. В их программах есть тяги, жимы гантелей, упражнения на спину, ноги, плечевой пояс, корпус и общую работоспособность. ⚡️И это не «бодибилдерский мусор», а инструмен

9🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC648 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️Делюсь подготовкой одного из своих атлетов. Ярослав - работаем на жестком грифе 290кг 2х2, лучший результат на помосте около 315кг В НАТУРАШКУ! ✏️Сейчас наша задача получить Мастера Спорта в ФПР, а также попытаться установить рекорд России. Цели грандиозные, но получить Мастера реально - уже собираем, но рекорд России - мы должны это сделать, будем стараться любой ценой. Как видите - даже на таких весах есть ош

10💊1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC686 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVbiwdPjnSU Хороший стрим, мне понравился, держите перезалив с МАКСИМАЛИСТОМ

12

1 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC783 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

220кг 3х3 Очень легко, даже сказать нечего, 300кг дальше ждёт меня Будет очень интересно на следующей неделе. Чутка ромбовидная побаливает, спортивный массаж, думаю, исправит

15

31 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC862 views34 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

❓РАЗБОР ТЕХНИКИ ЖИМА ПОДПИСЧИКА 🔼В этой рубрике я решил сделать именно видео, стараться делать акцент на грамотном живом объяснении, не просто написать текстом "плохо замостился". А старался объяснять каждую мелочь Были как и хорошие жимы, были как и техники, которые нужны в корректировке. ➕Я лишь стараюсь дать объяснения, и советы парням - которые сами попросили этого же. 😘Мне лично нравится данная рубрика, есл

31🔥2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wandam11ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTCAnonymous Poll107 voters

Хотите видео на ютуб? в часов 13? Буду философствовать на 20 минут на тему целеустремленности

  1. ебашь71%
  2. ждем41%
  3. свой ответ8%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTCAnonymous Poll155 voters

РАЗБОР ЖИМА ПОДПИСЧИКОВ, ждете? видео на 10 минут записал

  1. летс гоу, нужен хейт91%
  2. может не надо?10%
  3. свой ответ6%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Калибр 3.5” (@wandam11ch), 1,812 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wandam11ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.