Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Война. Без фейков

Channel

Война. Без фейков

@warfakeees

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,632subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744468587
TypeChannel
Username@warfakeees
Created14 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/warfakeees

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,63213,71713,674.56 August 2026 — 13,716 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,716 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,717 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,714 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,710 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,706 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,703 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,690 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,691 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,682 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,672 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,670 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,671 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,664 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,662 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,658 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,653 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,652 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,643 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,638 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,633 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,632 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 28 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,619–13,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 22:2713,632-1
1 Sept 2026, 20:0913,633-5
31 Aug 2026, 17:0713,638-5
30 Aug 2026, 13:5313,643-9
28 Aug 2026, 17:1713,652-1
27 Aug 2026, 16:2313,653-5
26 Aug 2026, 17:3813,658-4
25 Aug 2026, 14:2313,662-2
24 Aug 2026, 16:4413,664-1
21 Aug 2026, 15:2513,665-6
20 Aug 2026, 11:5713,671+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:0513,670-2
18 Aug 2026, 17:1413,672-10
17 Aug 2026, 16:2813,682-3
16 Aug 2026, 14:1413,685-6
14 Aug 2026, 20:2713,691+1
13 Aug 2026, 12:1913,690-5
12 Aug 2026, 13:0613,695-8
10 Aug 2026, 15:0313,703-3
9 Aug 2026, 11:3213,706first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.2%
avg views ÷ 13,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,570
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.526%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held43 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total334,960
Reactions total1,761
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24m 24s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,223 reactions across 43 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥58326.2%
👍41018.4%
😁39717.9%
💯31914.3%
22810.3%
🤬843.78%
👌733.28%
🤔482.16%
411.84%
🤝130.585%
🫡130.585%
🗿80.36%
👏30.135%
👀10.045%
😢10.045%
🤯10.045%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC595 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вскоре после американских заявлений об очистке Ормузского пролива от установленных Ираном мин - на мине подорвался ещё один нефтяной танкер, ещё и с двумя жертвами. Судя по темпам побед над Ираном, ближайшие американские выборы будут полностью взяты демократами. Война. Без фейков

😁21💯7🗿2

2 Sept 2026, 07:10 UTC725 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesVideo

«Чушь собачья!» Владимир Путин заявил, что вбросы о мобилизации — это информационная атака на Россию. Только в августе мы опровергали такие фейки не меньше десятка раз. Посмотрите, от кого они исходят: · Владимир Зеленский. · ГУР Украины. · The Wall Street Journal (и даже дважды). · Украинские СМИ. · Российские СМИ-иноагенты. · Антироссийские телеграм-каналы. · Украинские боты. · Фейковые аккаунты в соцсетях. Гля

👍30💯4🤬4🤔1

1 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,350 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ВС РФ продолжают уничтожать украинскую логистику. В том числе — международную. Почему при этом наносятся удары по погранпереходам — недавно объясняли. Очередной целью стал переход «Орловка», расположенный на границе с Румынией. Его особенность — паромная переправа. Пункт не работает. Об ударах по самим паромам украинская сторона не сообщает. Однако она подтверждает, что в условиях фактического паралича морского соо

👍43🔥1352

29 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈2,090 views74 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Склад боеприпасов в населенном пункте Милая Киевской области (ООО «Фаер поинт»), в складских помещениях которого хранились комплектующие и стартовые ускорители для БПЛА большой дальности FP-1/FP-2, детонирует с ночи 29 августа 2026 года. Война. Без фейков

🔥62👍73🤬2

28 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,240 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Соединенные Штаты сообщили посредникам, что Трамп не хочет возвращаться к меморандуму о взаимопонимании c Ираном. Иран же, в свою очередь, заявил, что не будет участвовать в каких-либо переговорах, пока все пункты меморандума о взаимопонимании не будут полностью реализованы. Этот конфликт тоже перешел в стадию войны на истощение, причем победа США без неприемлемых издержек не выглядит очевидной. Война. Без фейков

🤔25💯91

26 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,620 views48 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @warfakes

Posted without readable text

😁32💯104🤬2

25 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈21,600 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Никита Пестов — кавалер ордена Мужества — попал под вражеский обстрел в марте 2023-го. Он принял осколки на себя и прикрыл товарища, который и вынес его из-под огня. А потом — долгое лечение, ампутация ноги и восстановление, возвращение в мирную жизнь. Его жена Валерия была рядом с первых дней лечения. По её словам, после возвращения домой Никита активно занимается детьми и хозяйством — насколько позволяет состояние

34🔥6🫡2💯1

25 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,020 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Тем временем украинская сторона стреляет себе в ногу. Впрочем, такая ситуация давно никого не удивляет. Но что на этот раз? Не секрет, что ВС РФ плотно взялись за логистику киевского режима. В том числе якобы «зерновую», под прикрытием которой поставляются и вооружения. В одну сторону транспорт идёт с зерном, в обратную — с грузами иного характера. Да и сама возможность Украины продавать зерно — это пополнение их бю

🔥464💯4🤬1

22 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,960 views56 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Заукраинская пропаганда льёт крокодиловы слёзы по стремительно уничтожаемой логистике киевского режима. Но просто жаловаться — не по-пропагандистски: не давит на эмоции, не заставляет европейского обывателя в ужасе заламывать руки и проникаться жалостью из-за «страданий мирного населения». А потому на этот раз точкой давления на психику бюргеров и прочих жителей «просвещённого запада» был выбран продуктовый вопрос.

💯464👍3😁3

21 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,730 views68 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Танк M1A1 «Abrams» сил про-саудовского правительства Йемена был уничтожен сбросом с дрона хуситов. Судя по всему, добрались и до копирования опыта «Баб-Яг». Война. Без фейков

🔥60💯5👍2🫡1

21 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈2,590 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сразу ориентируются на основную долю активного молодого мужского населения. Война. Без фейков

😁38🤔5

20 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈2,060 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

Фейк: ВС РФ не освободили Малую Токмачку — этого не подтверждают ни российские, ни украинские OSINT-аналитики, утверждают украинские ТГ-каналы Правда: Перед нами очередной украинский антикриз, вброшенный, в том числе, через ЦИПсО-каналы, мимикрирующие под российские. На самом же деле наши товарищи из авторитетного и крупнейшего российского OSINT-проекта @lost_armour, опираясь на собственные источники на местах, подт

💯284👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @warfakeees. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Война с фейками
@warfakes · 384,354
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Правда за нами
@zarussia_1 · 90,096
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Нити Империи
@RusUnlimited · 106,319
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Война. Без фейков” (@warfakeees), 13,632 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warfakeees.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.