Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 986–1,429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 07:39
1,378
+75
13 Sept 2026, 18:15
1,303
+31
10 Sept 2026, 05:56
1,272
+17
5 Sept 2026, 00:57
1,255
-3
1 Sept 2026, 16:56
1,258
+8
29 Aug 2026, 16:35
1,250
+46
26 Aug 2026, 21:45
1,204
+139
23 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,065
+7
20 Aug 2026, 02:42
1,058
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:52
1,059
+2
12 Aug 2026, 18:33
1,057
+20
9 Aug 2026, 12:33
1,037
-6
6 Aug 2026, 22:57
1,043
no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:17
1,043
first reading
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
61 reactions across 3 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5377634190890145115
12
19.7%
custom 5375455792067549653
9
14.8%
❤
8
13.1%
🦄
8
13.1%
custom 5280793003466728005
6
9.84%
💘
4
6.56%
custom 5265153614497740567
3
4.92%
custom 5474315145968655736
3
4.92%
custom 5278627244732886370
2
3.28%
custom 5461028278091402565
2
3.28%
custom 5474195638503648314
2
3.28%
custom 5474348947361273901
2
3.28%
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сиреневые облака нежности, звуки музыки и акварельный переливы 😌 Я чувствую любовь, а вы?.. "ПоЧУВСТВОвать" - выставка, которая сейчас идёт в Музее музыки.
🦋🦋🦋
🦋🦋🦋Выставка
Предлагает нам почувствовать музыку всеми возможными способами. Не только услышать, но и увидеть - представить, какого цвет та или иная мелодия, какой у неё может быть аромат... И наоборот - предположить, как могла бы звучать та или иная картина, …
Чудесный цветущий домик с чашками, свечами, ароматами, надписями про любовь и кофейней! Это недавно открывшийся магазинчик Флаувау 💕 И он действительно - вау и флау, чтобы это ни значило!
💗💗💗
💗💗💗
💗💗💗Атмосфера
Мне очень понравилось, что в пространстве сохранили много воздуха, а не стали заполнять каждый сантиметр товарами. Штучки стоят не в тесноте, поэтому всё можно удобно рассмотреть. Плюс вблизи хрупких предметов …
Меня никогда не похищали инопланетяне! А вас? 🙂 Если всё-таки немножко похищали, обязательно сходите посмотреть на эти картины, пока они не улетучились!
🪐🪐🪐🪐
🪐🪐🪐🪐🪐
🪐🪐🪐🪐Выставка
Меня никогда не похищали инопланетяне проходит сейчас в галерее ЗДЕСЬ на Таганке, и это самое яркое, самое дофаминовое и радостное событие, на котором я была за последнее время!
На выставке представлены картины Вити Повезло и Насти Ли…
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @warm_yellow_socks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тёплые жёлтые носочки” (@warm_yellow_socks), 1,378 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warm_yellow_socks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
