Channel
@warwarv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003581132651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @warwarv |
| Description | Новости войны ⚡ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 16 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/warwarv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 17 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❗️КНДР развёртывает в России своё ракетное подразделение для нанесения ударов по Украине — Reuters По словам источников СМИ, в развёртывании будут задействованы 120 северокорейских баллистических ракет и 6 пусковых установок. Кроме того, Пхеньян уже передал Москве новую партию из 40 баллистических ракет KN-23 и KN-24, а также отправил в Россию личный состав, пишет Reuters.
Закрытие украинского пункта управления БПЛА 🥷 @warwarv
Xoxлы влетели в дерево на квадроцикле, испугавшись нашего дрона 😆 От неминуемой участи им уйти не удалось. Запорожское направление. ТОЛЕРАСТИЯ - ПЕРЕЙТИ В КАНАЛ
Феерические кадры поражения пункта БПЛА ВСУ ударом БПЛА БМ-35 «Рубикон». После попадания произошла повторная детонация боевых частей БПЛА в здании 🥷 @warwarv
Наша армия начала применять для ударов по Украине новый беспилотник «Герань-5», который летит быстрее классической «Герани» и поэтому его сложнее перехватить. "Росич" в MAX | TG | VK
Сильные взрывы в Киеве, возможно был запущен «Орешник». Кадры ударов уже в сети 🥷 @warwarv
Укрепление ВСУ немного приуныло 🥷@warwarv
🔥9 Мая - день силы духа и памяти. Низкий поклон ветеранам. ❤️🔥С Днём Победы! Помним, гордимся и желаем всем мира, крепкого здоровья и надежды. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 🥷ВАЙТЕР❤️🔥
CNN: Китай готовится поставить Ирану новые системы ПВО. Источники сообщают каналу что Китай работает над тем, чтобы передать системы через третьи страны и не вмешиваться в конфликт напрямую. Речь о переносных ЗРК для сбития самолетов, которые в российском исполнении отлично показали себя.
США наносят удары по бункерам и оборонительным сооружениям на острове Харк. Израиль начал бомбардировку железных дорог по всему Ирану. Бомбят логистику КСИР заявляет, что сдержанность закончилась и они будут наносить удары по инфраструктуре США и их партнеров, пригрозив нарушить поставки нефти и газа в регионе на долгие годы. 🥷@warwarv
Львов, центр города. Весна, цветёт герань. 🥷@warwarv
Наши бойцы законтрили хохлолет 🥷@warwarv
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @warwarv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@warwarv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WARWAR” (@warwarv), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warwarv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.