Channel
@waves89
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,101subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001384494068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @waves89 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/waves89 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 13,101 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 13,100 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 13,096 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 13,103 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 13,099 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 13,097 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 13,091 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 13,096 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 13,107 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 13,106 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 13,102 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 13,104 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 13,103 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 13,097 | +11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 13,086 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 13,092 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 13,098 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 13,096 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 13,091 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 13,093 | first reading |
101 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (3 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 342,870 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Как выбрать страну в Латинской Америке? Общались сегодня с приятелем, он туда собирается переезжать. Спрашивал разные нюансы. Вот какое моё объяснение (путешественника с почти сотней стран в бэкграунде) ему зашло: Бразилия – типо южная Россия, основная экономика региона, на которой все остальные завязаны. Разница между Флорипой и Рио примерно как между Москвой и Читой. Парагвай – местная Беларусь. Все чёт выращиваю…
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Мировой голод После начала взаимного уничтожения инфраструктуры в Чёрном море, средства массовой информации запестрили заголовками о надвигающемся голодоморе всемирного масштаба. Дело не только в пшенице и подсолнечном масле, но ещё и в удобрениях (что производятся из газа), а также в Супер Эль-Ниньо (потепление океана, что приводит в частности к обмелению европейских рек). Это всё страшно, но в плане продовольстви…
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Скоро всей вашей Америке кирдык В конце сегодняшнего ролика обещал написать о том, на сколько хватит американской экономики и за какими показателями инвесторам в зарубежные акции надо следить. Чтобы не перегружать макрой, выделю самый главный – доходность трежерей (это ихние ОФЗ). И в отличии от нашенских, которые влияют только на местный рынок, в их долге есть конкретные уровни, которые активируют боль сперва в са…
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
— Мам, можно чуть коммунизма у России взять? — У нас свой коммунизм дома! Дома:
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
🎞 Почему нефть до сих пор не по $200 и Россия до сих пор не утонула в шальных деньгах? Ведь Ормуз закрыт, Баб-эль-Мандебский пролив прикрыт, резервы у стран G7 на исторических минимумах, а потребление в мире не сильно сократилось. Разбираемся в новом ролике: https://youtu.be/ARljN9fwo4I
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Дорога из бедности Когда я открыл личку, много людей туда стало писать, мол: займи денег, проинвестируй в проект, научи за будущую прибыль с трейдинга и т.д. Мой ответ им конечно не понравился. Я вообще искренне удивляюсь, что кто-то такое пишет, как будто бы хоть раз попрошайничество срабатывало. Ну ладно. Я всё равно тут публично отвечу, что делал я, чтобы подняться с низов. Эта стратегия срабатывала 3 раза из 3…
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Инфографика ко вчерашнему посту про нефть. Пока, судя по статистике, возобновлением работы Ормуза в довоенных объемах прямо совсем не пахнет. Хотя я видел и другие подсчёты, что трафик упал не в 20 раз, а всего лишь в жалкие 3. Но даже если истина где-то между, то все мои подсчёты остаются актуальными, ну может быть со сдвигом на пару месяцев вправо.
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Бомблю на тему грядущего осенью звездица в кружочках — готовлю подписчиков к (нужное подчеркнуть) мобилизации/ядерке/кризису/пандемии/увольнению/дефолту
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
#USDRUB, 1m, #клубминутка. Жаль, что взял малым объемом вчера. Но зато лишний раз затестил фрактальных дементоров – работают. Стоп в безубытке.
Signed Igor Tereshchenkov
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @waves89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 465,022 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игорь Терещенков” (@waves89), 13,101 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waves89.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.