Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for puzzlebot :// AI‑сервис для создания продуктов в мессенджерах

Channel

puzzlebot :// AI‑сервис для создания продуктов в мессенджерах

@wearepuzzlebot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

50,129subscribers

-1,992 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420757506
TypeChannel
Username@wearepuzzlebot
DescriptionОфициальное сообщество пользователей @puzzlebot 🤖 puzzlebot — AI‑сервис для создания продуктов в мессенджерах От небольшой воронки до целой экосистемы — в одном сервисе Сайт: https://puzzlebot.top Бот: @puzzlebot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wearepuzzlebot

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

50,12952,12151,1256 August 2026 — 52,121 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,107 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,062 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,008 subscribers9 August 2026 — 51,958 subscribers10 August 2026 — 51,897 subscribers11 August 2026 — 51,849 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,796 subscribers13 August 2026 — 51,730 subscribers14 August 2026 — 51,652 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,587 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,526 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,484 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,454 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,404 subscribers21 August 2026 — 51,310 subscribers22 August 2026 — 51,247 subscribers24 August 2026 — 51,162 subscribers25 August 2026 — 51,105 subscribers26 August 2026 — 51,048 subscribers27 August 2026 — 51,000 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,958 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,913 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,867 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,828 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,773 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,732 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,675 subscribers6 September 2026 — 50,594 subscribers9 September 2026 — 50,465 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,381 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,341 subscribers15 September 2026 — 50,272 subscribers17 September 2026 — 50,206 subscribers19 September 2026 — 50,129 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 45 days, net -1,992. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,830–52,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:5750,129-77
17 Sept 2026, 05:0150,206-66
15 Sept 2026, 07:1550,272-69
13 Sept 2026, 16:0050,341-40
11 Sept 2026, 19:3850,381-84
9 Sept 2026, 10:3750,465-129
6 Sept 2026, 05:1750,594-81
3 Sept 2026, 20:2050,675-57
2 Sept 2026, 10:3750,732-41
1 Sept 2026, 11:4650,773-55
31 Aug 2026, 08:1150,828-39
30 Aug 2026, 06:1850,867-46
29 Aug 2026, 08:1350,913-45
28 Aug 2026, 06:0650,958-42
27 Aug 2026, 05:0451,000-48
26 Aug 2026, 04:0351,048-57
25 Aug 2026, 05:4651,105-57
24 Aug 2026, 04:2751,162-85
22 Aug 2026, 10:4551,247-63
21 Aug 2026, 03:3451,310first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.94%
avg views ÷ 50,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held49 (14 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total17,685
Reactions total205
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
655
Videos
289
Links
753

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 25s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

582 reactions across 42 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20835.7%
🔥20835.7%
👍15125.9%
👎152.58%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 49 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wearepuzzlebot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC453 views19 reactionsread 24 September 2026

👋 Большое обновление puzzlebot: Puzzlo AI, новый интерфейс и MCP В новом видео рассказали, как изменилась платформа после переезда на домен .bot, и продемонстрировали работу Puzzlo AI: ИИ-помощник получил описание задачи и самостоятельно собрал воронку и магазин в мини-приложении Подробнее: VK Видео | YouTube ⚙️ Также рассказали о новом лендинге и личном кабинете, обновленной базе знаний, поддержке на платформе и

🔥86👍4👎1

22 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC732 views10 reactionsread 24 September 2026

❗️ Важно для всех, кто использует API puzzlebot Мы продолжаем переезд в доменную зону .bot. Теперь для работы с API нужно использовать новый адрес: https://api.puzzle.bot Если в ваших проектах все еще указан старый адрес https://api.puzzlebot.top, обязательно замените его на новый — даже если сейчас все работает без ошибок В скором времени старый домен перестанет поддерживаться, поэтому рекомендуем проверить свои

👎72👍1

19 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,240 views10 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

Какое правило вы бы ввели для всех пользователей интернета?

  1. Голосовые длиннее 2 минут - только с кратким содержанием34%
  2. Сообщение "Привет" - сразу вместе с сутью вопроса49%
  3. За спойлер без предупреждения - пожизненный бан22%
  4. Реклама должна закрываться с первого нажатия60%
  5. Фото монитора на телефон запрещены - делаем скриншоты22%
  6. Добавлять людей в чаты можно только с их согласия42%
  7. Напишу свое правило в комментариях12%

The shares total 241%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍53🔥2

19 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

🎙 Субботний БОТ КАСТ #27: Интернет по нашим правилам Что бы вы изменили, если бы на один день получили доступ к настройкам интернета? В новом выпуске придумываем цифровой кодекс, вводим обязательные описания для длинных голосовых и выясняем, почему фраза "ну понятно" может означать примерно все что угодно Также обсуждаем ваши ответы на прошлые вопросы: разбираемся, почему робот-пылесос требует сначала убрать кварти

🔥32👍1

16 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC≈1,430 views6 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Продлеваем скидку 30% до конца дня 🎰 Выбрать тариф

🔥6

13 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,970 views20 reactionsread 24 September 2026

🎂 Скидка 30%* на годовые тарифы на 3 дня в честь дня рождения puzzlebot ⏺ Креативный тариф 11 880 ₽ — 8 270 ₽ ⏺ Расширенный тариф 20 280 ₽ — 14 170 ₽ ⏺ Профессиональный тариф 35 880 ₽ — 25 070 ₽ ⏺ Индивидуальные тарифы также участвуют в акции, а *для юридических лиц действует скидка 10% Впереди еще одно важное обновление — новая тарифная сетка. Скоро расскажем обо всех изменениях, а пока можно выбрать годовой

9👍6🔥5

13 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,630 views45 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video

❤️ Праздничное #Обновление от 13.09.2026 В этот раз обновление затронуло не только отдельные функции, но и сам puzzlebot: сайт переехал на новый домен, привычные разделы получили новый интерфейс, а создавать и редактировать проекты теперь можно с помощью ИИ — Маскот и помощник Puzzlo AI. Теперь в интерфейса личного кабинета живёт ИИ-помощник Puzzlo и он умеет создавать отдельные команды, условия, формулы, переменны

🔥1814👍10👎3

9 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,590 views24 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

⭐ Подборка статей от пользователей 👤 Владислав Сереберцев рассказал о мини-приложении для разбора музыкальных релизов. В единой системе артисты отправляют треки, редакторы готовят обзоры, а главный редактор проверяет их качество. Внутри также реализованы статусы заявок, подписки, рейтинги, достижения и система мотивации редакторов Подробнее: https://vc.ru/telegram/2985251-telegram-prilozhenie-dlya-razbora-muzyki 👩

13👍6🔥5

3 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,880 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Как получить ID медиафайла для бота в Max В Telegram для получения ID медиафайла достаточно отправить своему боту команду /cp. Для ботов в Max такой возможности пока нет. Способом получить нужный ID через тестовый вебхук поделился 👤 Алексей Алехно Весь процесс пошагово показали в карточках выше ☝️ 🔗 Сервис Webhook Tester 🔗 Расширение Webhook Tester для Chrome Для получения тестовых вебхуков также можно использова

5👍5🔥5

31 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,890 views18 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

#Решение: Как получить фото от пользователя через форму ввода 👤 Светлана Гизатулина поделилась полезной настройкой, которая помогает запрашивать изображения через форму ввода и сразу пересылать их в нужную группу. Такое решение отлично подойдет для сбора чеков об оплате или заполнения анкет с личным фото Пошаговый процесс настройки: 1. Создадим "Обычную команду", например "фото", затем добавим блок "Форма ввода"

👍6🔥65👎1

28 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,870 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

📋 Как создать умный чек-лист в мини-приложении Пошаговую настройку такого функционала продемонстрировал 👤 Азиз Мухиддинов в новой видеоинструкции Для реализации использовались: ❤️ Команды и мини-приложения — для создания интерфейса и логики чек-листа ❤️ Переменные — для хранения и обработки данных ❤️ Готовый шаблон из Генератора HTML-шаблонов 💬 Пишите в комментариях, разбор каких полезных инструментов вы хотели

6🔥4👍3

25 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,920 views19 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026
Photo

🚀 Масштабное обновление: что Telegram приготовил к своему 13-летию Недавно Telegram отметил 13-летие, и в честь этого события разработчики представили крупное обновление. В этот раз команда мессенджера добавила инструменты, которые помогут сделать каналы и группы более интерактивными и значительно упростят работу с новыми подписчиками Главные нововведения: — Приветственные сообщения. В группах и каналах теперь мож

8🔥7👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @wearepuzzlebot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Какое правило вы бы ввели для всех пользователей интернета?

  1. Голосовые длиннее 2 минут - только с кратким содержанием34%
  2. Сообщение "Привет" - сразу вместе с сутью вопроса49%
  3. За спойлер без предупреждения - пожизненный бан22%
  4. Реклама должна закрываться с первого нажатия60%
  5. Фото монитора на телефон запрещены - делаем скриншоты22%
  6. Добавлять людей в чаты можно только с их согласия42%
  7. Напишу свое правило в комментариях12%

The shares total 241%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Какой атрибут "идеального быта" разочаровал вас после покупки больше всего?

  1. Эстетичная посуда (прозрачные чайники, красивые бокалы)18%
  2. Открытые полки и баночки (главные пылесборники)34%
  3. "Умная" техника (робот-пылесос, за которым нужно убирать)30%
  4. Громоздкая мебель (кухонные острова, огромные диваны)18%
  5. Атрибуты ЗОЖ (блендеры, беговые дорожки-вешалки)25%
  6. Мой быт на 100% практичный41%
  7. Напишу свой вариант в комментариях25%

The shares total 191%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

За какие сервисы вы продолжаете платить скорее по привычке или ради эстетики?

  1. ИИ-ассистенты и нейросети23%
  2. Таск-менеджеры, заметки и календари8%
  3. Трекеры сна, привычек и здоровья10%
  4. Редакторы, облака и другой рабочий софт18%
  5. У меня нет таких подписок66%
  6. Напишу свой вариант в комментариях15%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“puzzlebot :// AI‑сервис для создания продуктов в мессенджерах” (@wearepuzzlebot), 50,129 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wearepuzzlebot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.