Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for емисфа вещает

Channel

емисфа вещает

@wearworld

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,243subscribers

-538 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001808173128
TypeChannel
Username@wearworld
Created1 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wearworld

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,24317,11616,679.56 August 2026 — 16,781 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,797 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,815 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,981 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,052 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,060 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,030 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,116 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,929 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,883 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,851 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,817 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,784 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,732 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,689 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,644 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,624 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,602 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,562 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,537 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,531 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,512 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,493 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,479 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,458 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,436 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,372 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,338 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,313 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,293 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,268 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,243 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -538. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,112–17,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:5516,243-25
16 Sept 2026, 13:2016,268-25
14 Sept 2026, 18:4016,293-20
13 Sept 2026, 06:1716,313-25
11 Sept 2026, 06:4016,338-34
8 Sept 2026, 08:5416,372-64
5 Sept 2026, 04:5616,436-22
3 Sept 2026, 07:5816,458-21
2 Sept 2026, 05:0916,479-14
1 Sept 2026, 01:3816,493-19
31 Aug 2026, 02:4216,512-19
30 Aug 2026, 01:3416,531-6
29 Aug 2026, 00:1916,537-25
27 Aug 2026, 22:0416,562-40
26 Aug 2026, 19:0816,602-22
25 Aug 2026, 15:5216,624-20
24 Aug 2026, 12:3316,644-45
22 Aug 2026, 18:4716,689-43
21 Aug 2026, 09:4716,732-52
20 Aug 2026, 09:4416,784first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 16,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,970
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held66 (28 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total45,224
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54182340657676686191458.3%
custom 5418284046302094513729.2%
custom 5416090365985871711312.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC915 viewsread 1 September 2026

че за привычка у всех писать про школу?

31 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

БОЕВЫЕ БОТИНКИ времен динозавров видимо… «ноуфейзстудиос» продолжают безостановочно КЛЕПАТЬ вещи. в это и раз видим СОСТАРЕННЫЕ, кожаные ботинки… я ес честно захотел…ну так дефолт

31 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

с пацанами на шанель собрались

30 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

они НИКОГДА не перестанут УДИВЛЯТЬ… команда Глеба «Solutions.» устраивала ( вчера - сегодня ) - лазерную перфорацию на ВАШИХ вещах. кто ходил?

30 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

RACER WORLDWIDE и NEW ROCK 2.0. В этот раз бренды представили не только обувь, но и Кожанку… Высокие казачки с ремешками и фирменными вставками рейсер, металический каблук. а про кожанку могу сказать - что она БЕЗУМНО крутая.

30 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 3 September 2026

там у рейсера опять совместная работа с ньюрок, седня расскажу покажу

29 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC468 viewsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @i124galeriePhoto

1OF1 NIZOR БЕСПЛАТНО Уникальная футболка от дизайнера Nizor Alimsho, известного по работе с 9mice и kai angel. Была приобретена лично у Fakov'a и является единственной в своем роде. УСЛОВИЯ 1. Подписка на: • i124.galerie • revivál • tće iconoclastic 2. Включить уведомления Желаем всем удачи!

29 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 3 September 2026

nizor alimsho — дизайнер, который сделал культ из дефицита есть дизайнеры, которых узнают по сложному крою, материалам и безупречной работе с формой. а есть nizor alimsho и мне кажется, его феномен вообще не об этом. если смотреть на вещи без имени на бирке, дизайн у nizor достаточно простой: футболки, худи, лонгсливы, графика, надписи, отсылки к металу, андеграунду и интернет-культуре. ничего принципиально нового

28 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC474 viewsread 29 August 2026

Кто еще не зашел. заходите, смотрите.

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @wearworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@wearworld edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

НОВЫЙ ИНТЕРАКТИВ СЕГОДНЯ?

  1. Да83%
  2. Не нужно21%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

solutions
@solutions · 53,692
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 25 August 2026
ГОША РУБЧИНСКИЙ
@gosharubchinskiy · 50,774
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“емисфа вещает” (@wearworld), 16,243 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wearworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.