Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Web 3.0 :: Web3

Channel

Web 3.0 :: Web3

@web3news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,376subscribers

+1,219 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001214320724
TypeChannel
Username@web3news
DescriptionСамый полный фундаментальный и стоимостный анализ по Web 3.0: Web3, DAO, blockchain, криптовалюты, NFT, #DeFi (ReFi, RWA, etc.) - и о прочем, что связано с будущим технологий. Netstalking. Рекламы в канале нет. Админ: @menaskop
Created8 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/web3news

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1467,3766,7615 August 2026 — 6,157 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,157 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,146 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,429 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,609 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,582 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,563 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,393 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,336 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,270 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,260 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,257 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,240 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,441 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,447 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,440 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,434 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,435 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,630 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,814 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,779 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,156 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,122 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,376 subscribers5 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,219. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,962–7,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:077,376+254
2 Nov 2026, 06:187,122-34
30 Oct 2026, 12:367,156+377
27 Oct 2026, 21:166,779-35
24 Oct 2026, 21:176,814+184
22 Oct 2026, 03:216,630+195
19 Oct 2026, 03:276,435+1
16 Oct 2026, 02:106,434-6
12 Oct 2026, 23:566,440-7
6 Oct 2026, 08:216,447+6
29 Sept 2026, 10:596,441+201
15 Sept 2026, 21:196,240-17
12 Sept 2026, 02:006,257-3
7 Sept 2026, 10:576,260-10
2 Sept 2026, 17:046,270-66
30 Aug 2026, 14:066,336-57
27 Aug 2026, 20:476,393+178
24 Aug 2026, 15:476,215-348
20 Aug 2026, 21:056,563-19
17 Aug 2026, 20:166,582first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 7,376 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held68 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total17,734
Reactions total334
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 02:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,110
Videos
≈39
Links
≈4,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

898 reactions across 45 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍55862.1%
✍889.80%
❤525.79%
custom 5228887511945740035384.23%
🤔374.12%
🔥364.01%
💯202.23%
😢182.00%
🤝121.34%
👏91.00%
🕊70.78%
custom 522676452249623123160.668%
custom 522896927953312046860.668%
👎60.668%
🦄50.557%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,028 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
66
across the posts below
Posts paid on
44
of 51 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @web3news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,020 views24 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

коротко: хочу рассказать о странном факте, зафиксированном 04.11.13, т.е. 13 лет 1 день назад. первые DEX-биржи пришли в WW3 в 2014-2016 гг.: NXT Asset Exchange, о кот., возможно, слышали, но забыли, а затем и менее известные - Counterparty DEX, Block DX. в 2016-ом же появилась Etherdelta, забыть о кот. уже не получится. но что тогда в 2013-ом и ранее делала приставка dex в моём обменнике? всё просто - это дань п…

😢13❤8✍1👎1🤔1

Signed Menaskop

5 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC≈1,080 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

коротко: главный секрет в общении с #AI состоит в том, что спрашивать должен он вас, а не вы его.

👍13✍2👎1

Signed Menaskop

4 Nov 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,110 views24 reactions4 Starsread 6 November 2026

#минимализм: продолжаем… девятое - делайте прогнозы. не надо много: 2-3 на год. можно 10. но не 100. и отслеживайте эти нарративы, тенденции и (боковые) тренды. зачем? это будет вашим скелетом действий внутри Web 3.0 & Web3 (WW3) и поможет сосредоточиться на том, что действительно важно и значимо, а не подаётся СМИ, кот. далеко не всегда хочется объективности. бонусом - получаете собственное развитие и в итоге - уве…

👍16✍2❤2🔥2🤔1custom 52288875119457400351

Signed Menaskop

3 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,130 views18 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

коротко: обязательно смотрите курс по криптокладам: это поможет вам и в безопасности, и в доходных стратегиях, и во многих других аспектах WW3.

👍12❤2✍1👎1🤔1custom 52288875119457400351

Signed Menaskop

3 Nov 2026, 08:45 UTCviews —

Web 3.0 :: Web3 pinned «#минимализм: под этим тегом буду раз в неделю (а на этой - каждый день :)) публиковать лайфхаки свои относительно цифровой и Web 3.0 & Web3 гигиены именно, т.к. именно захламлённость (головы, потока дел, устройств и проч.) приводит в итоге к тому, что испытываем…»

3 Nov 2026, 04:25 UTCviews —

Web 3.0 :: Web3 pinned «#DeFi: а точнее - приватные ДеФи - будущее криптофшора, поэтому напомню ряд очевидных, но важных сервисов: • railgun.org - один из не многих, кого продвигает В. Бутерин. описание работы: см. по ссылке. • anon.inc - кошелёк от той же команды. • thorswap.finance…»

3 Nov 2026, 03:54 UTC≈1,140 views25 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026

шестое - пожалуй, 1 из самых важных принципов и подходов. если уж применяете Win, то разберитесь с тем, как и что там устроено: раньше рекомендовал бы изучить баш-команды и реестр, но сейчас бесконечно далёк от темы, хотя тестовое устройство с Win всё ещё наличествует. это же касается ОСи. браузера. и любого ПО и “железа”, кот. находится у вас: даже лампа на столе - то, что не должно появляться в Wi-Fi-сетке, а также…

👍17🔥3✍2💯1custom 52288875119457400351custom 52289692795331204681

Signed Menaskop

3 Nov 2026, 03:54 UTC≈1,100 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#минимализм: под этим тегом буду раз в неделю (а на этой - каждый день :)) публиковать лайфхаки свои относительно цифровой и Web 3.0 & Web3 гигиены именно, т.к. именно захламлённость (головы, потока дел, устройств и проч.) приводит в итоге к тому, что испытываем бесконечный "DDoS" с одной стороны, а значит (с другой) - становимся легкодоступной жертвой для мошенников разного рода. писать буду вразнобой, т.к. всё это…

❤6👍5

Signed Menaskop

2 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTCviews —

Web 3.0 :: Web3 pinned «#безопасность: подведём итоги прошлой недели... самое странное и страшное для меня во всех атаках подобного типа (Mt.Gox, Wazir X, Bitmex, Bybit, Binance, etc.) состоит в том, что методы KYC & AML, которые так жёстко проходятся по рядовым пользователям, никогда…»

2 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,140 views23 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026

о важном: тема же этой недели - цифровой #минимализм... ниже - перевод статьи В. Бутерина, кот. поразила меня буквально и в сердце, и в мозг: насколько это близко к тому, чем живу сам (мой рюкзак для перелётов, впрочем, ещё меньше, чем у Виталика, но это, пожалуй, единственное и весьма не существенное отличие). вам может показаться, что это всё - не так значимо: ресурсов ведь всегда много?.. но это не так и Web 3.0…

👍17✍4🤔1custom 52288875119457400351

Signed Menaskop

2 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,100 views25 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

#безопасность: подведём итоги прошлой недели... самое странное и страшное для меня во всех атаках подобного типа (Mt.Gox, Wazir X, Bitmex, Bybit, Binance, etc.) состоит в том, что методы KYC & AML, которые так жёстко проходятся по рядовым пользователям, никогда не работают против тех, на кого они направлены. собственно, 2 простых примера: 1. захват самолёта: вы бывали в аэропортах? мне порой приходилось делать по …

👍15✍5🤔2custom 52288875119457400352❤1

Signed Menaskop

1 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTCviews —

Web 3.0 :: Web3 pinned «#книги: да, сегодня не будет одной единственной, но будет сразу несколько, зато объединённых общей тематикой: путь-и-шествие. моё отношение к подобному роду деятельности весьма неоднозначное: с одной стороны, если учитывать страны, где был хотя бы 1 день…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @web3news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IvanovInvest
@ivanovinvest_rus · 20,067
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Блокчейн Hunter | Вакансии в крипто-индустрии
@workingincrypto · 28,705
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Все о блокчейн/мозге/space/WEB 3.0 в России и мире
@blockchainRF · 20,459
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 September 2026
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 63,724
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
ForkLog
@forklog · 101,497
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Квест Теория Каст и Ролей
@alexkrol · 18,764
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Web 3.0 :: Web3” (@web3news), 7,376 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.