BlockChainWORLD.ai - Web3World & Blockchain & Infinite Digital daily crypto and AI news and promos! Vortex & Crypto Bros official channel
⚡️ Reach for promos [email protected]
Created
Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 59 days, net -8,885. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,579–51,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 17:39
40,912
-544
26 Sept 2026, 17:37
41,456
-556
19 Sept 2026, 13:37
42,012
-245
17 Sept 2026, 01:41
42,257
-155
15 Sept 2026, 04:18
42,412
-192
13 Sept 2026, 11:40
42,604
-252
11 Sept 2026, 18:18
42,856
-520
9 Sept 2026, 08:16
43,376
-366
5 Sept 2026, 23:18
43,742
-220
3 Sept 2026, 22:19
43,962
-206
2 Sept 2026, 11:16
44,168
-143
1 Sept 2026, 08:58
44,311
-52
31 Aug 2026, 07:23
44,363
-106
30 Aug 2026, 09:13
44,469
-135
29 Aug 2026, 08:36
44,604
-194
28 Aug 2026, 05:16
44,798
-149
27 Aug 2026, 02:48
44,947
-150
26 Aug 2026, 05:49
45,097
-179
25 Aug 2026, 08:03
45,276
-216
24 Aug 2026, 09:14
45,492
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.3%
avg views ÷ 40,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,800
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
32 (27 May 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
152,600
Reactions total
4,488
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,350
Videos
≈101
Links
≈180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 53s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,384 reactions across 31 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,222
26.9%
❤
4,799
24.8%
🎉
4,766
24.6%
🔥
4,597
23.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitcoin’s monthly MACD is signaling the end of the bearish momentum, which historically has marked the transition into the early stages of a bull market 😎
We could still see a correction around the midterm elections. Historically, the bottom of that correction has been one of the best opportunities to enter the market at discounted prices.
BTC is successfully bouncing off the 200-week MA test. During all previous corrections, a test of this level has consistently signaled bottom formation and preceded a new ATH 🔼
A strong confirmation signal for those building spot positions now. A retest of the initial reaction zone at $75K–$70K is also possible, offering an opportunity to enter at more favorable levels.
BTC managed to break through one of the key long-term resistance levels. What’s important to see now is a successful hold above $86K.
🟢 Last time, a breakout of this level was followed by a new ATH.
🔴 If we fall back below it, there’s a risk that the selling pressure will continue.
The next opportunity for altcoin growth could come from a drop in BTC dominance 🤔
BTC.D is entering a new compression phase, which could be a positive signal for altcoins. The logic is simple:
🟢 BTC.D rises → capital concentrates in Bitcoin → bullish for BTC
🔴 BTC.D falls → capital flows into altcoins → creating room for an altseason
Ethereum is targeting $3,300 🔼
The last triangle breakout sent ETH nearly +31% in just three days. Now the chart is showing the exact same setup again — another triangle with a potential breakout to the upside.
If ETH repeats the same move this time, we could see it around $3,300.
Bitcoin is trading inside the range again, with everything coming down to two key levels:
🟢 $83K – a breakout and successful hold above it opens the way to $88K–$92K first, and potentially $100K after that.
🔴 $77K – losing this support could send BTC down to the next strong cluster around $71K–$72K.
As long as price remains inside the range, opening leveraged positions isn’t the best idea. Better to wait for the b…
In the next cycle, Bitcoin’s price peak will be between $170K and $190K 😎
The math:
⏺ BTC’s growth slows by an average of 28% each cycle: x115 → x21.7 → x7.9
⏺ The next bull market could deliver a 2.2x–3.9x increase from the $58K bottom: a range of $128K to $229K
⏺ Averaged data points to a potential peak of up to $190K
What’s your bull market prediction?
🎉– $200K+
🔥– $170K max
👍 – There won’t be a bull market
Meanwhile, Bitcoin broke above $82,000 — for the first time since May 11 🧪
And over the past 24 hours, $510 million worth of short positions have been liquidated.
🕯 BTC fits the Wyckoff model well: it is consolidating in the $78K–$80K range, with a breakout above $85K expected in September.
ETH is closely following BTC and could soon move toward $3,500.
👼 Nvidia beat expectations again: revenue reached $96.2 billion, with Q3 guidance at $108 billion.
After a brief correction, the stock jumped 5% pre-market. Even Michael Burry bought Nvidia calls, though only as a hedge agains…
🤑 In 2019 and 2023, a sharp BTC breakout above the 200 WMA signaled that the market bottom was already far behind.
We’re seeing a similar pump now, but based on cycle timing, it has come too early. This rally badly needs continued buying support, and institutions are providing it — Bitcoin ETFs attracted $1.9 billion in inflows last week, marking their best result since November 2025.
$1.7 billion worth of short positions were liquidated over the past 4 hours — the second-largest short squeeze in crypto history 🎓
📈 BTC is already above $68K, while the total crypto market capitalization has surged by $160 billion.
The move was triggered by the U.S. Treasury’s announcement that it would increase the pace of bond buybacks, which could be seen as a signal of more liquidity entering the market.
🕯 BTC fell below $63K yesterday at the opening of the U.S. trading session. For three days in a row, we’ve seen Bitcoin dump at the U.S. open and then recover afterward. People on X are already trying to identify the mysterious U.S.-based manipulator.
💵 The stock market is gaining momentum. Memory manufacturers continued their recovery yesterday: Micron +4%, SanDisk +13%, Seagate +5%, and Western Digital +7%. Now, 7…
🎉258👍246🔥235❤231
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @web3worldchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlockChainWORLD.ai - daily crypto and AI news and promos!” (@web3worldchannel), 40,912 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3worldchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.