Channel
@web_of_dreams
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002270512961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @web_of_dreams |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/web_of_dreams |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 111 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 112 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 116 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 117 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 117 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 26.4% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5017175431325942865 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5282782531102454891 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Забанили в чате, за то что я дал ссылку на свою же статью на их сайте (чтобы не нарушать правила чата и не давать ссылку на ЛитКарту как на сторонний ресурс😂) А потом удивляемся, чего такое комьюнити токсичное, а тут вон модераторы площадки свои же правила не читают) @pishipro #пишипро статью тоже не забудьте снести 🤡
🤣2
Мы запускаем ЛитКарту Открываете карту, выбираете город и видите авторов, которые там живут и пишут. Можно зайти в профиль, познакомиться с автором, посмотреть его книги, жанры и найти ссылки на площадки. Сегодня карта начинает заполняться с нуля. Каждый новый автор становится на ней отдельной точкой, а город появляется вместе с первым опубликованным профилем. Мы хотим собрать на одной карте современных русскоязыч…
❤6👍5🔥5
🌟🌟🌟 Объявлены победители 7 очереди конкурса #Студенческийстартап Главный хит этого лета! 💡 Делай звук громче, ведь Фонд содействия инновациям публикует результаты главного конкурса для студентов, который проводится в рамках Платформы университетского технологического предпринимательства: 💡 2250 победителей получат грант 1 млн 💰 на реализацию своего стартапа! 🗣️ Генеральный директор Фонда Андрей Жижин подчёркивае…
🔥3
все выпустились😍
❤7🔥5👍3custom 50171754313259428653
нетоксичные писатели а вообще у меня на сайте ни одного всплывающего окна с оплатой нет, большинство функционала доступно на демо тарифе, а сам сайт пока что бесплатный, кроме ИИ-функций😢
😁5✍2🤣2❤1
Авторизация пользователей на отечественных сайтах должна быть строго с использованием российских номеров, Госуслуг, биометрии или другой системы, владельцем которой является гражданин РФ или имеет российское юрлицо. Если владелец сайта допускает регистрацию по иностранной электронной почты, например, Gmail — ему грозит штраф на 700 тысяч рублей. Такой законопроект об административных штрафах сразу во втором и треть…
🤣3👍2😁1
Блогер запостил в X картинку, написал, что сгенерировал её в стиле Моне и попросил людей рассказать, почему она хуже настоящего Моне. В тред пришли сотни «искусствоведов». Картину назвали бездушной AI-поделкой, ругали глубину, композицию и нашли ещё кучу проблем. Нюанс в том, что это не AI-генерация, а настоящая картина Моне из цикла Кувшинки. https://x.com/SHL0MS/status/2054280631807316329
🤣3❤1🤡1
Я не настолько ленивый, чтобы не написать хотя бы один пост за месяц Правда тут уже скорее дайджест (да и всё об одном, так то), но вообще в апреле было много чего прикольного, но и слишком длинным каким то он кажется Из самого интересного (для меня) Литкритик растет, за апрель благодаря сотрудничеству с несколькими крутыми ребятами и девушками на сайт пришло много пользователей. Я со своим проектом подавался на к…
🔥6💯3custom 52827825311024548912❤1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @web_of_dreams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Паутина снов 🕸” (@web_of_dreams), 111 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web_of_dreams.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.