Channel
@wewhoslaydragons
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
248subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003550800018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wewhoslaydragons |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wewhoslaydragons |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 248 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 246 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 245 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 246 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 244 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 233 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 230 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 230 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Currently, the EU's 'Chat Control' system can readily access: | - public or semi-public posts - files stored unencrypted on a provider's servers - messages in services that are not end-to-end encrypted - metadata and account signals (depending on the service and applicable laws) | Main civilian criticisms: | - Private communications and files can be subjected to automated inspection via voluntary scanning. - Automate…
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
29. (part three) They want to make him study technical subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend his life climbing the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as white. They want to make black fathers "responsible," they want black gangs to become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the industrial-technological system. The system couldnt care less what kind of music a man lis…
💯1
Video, posted without a caption
29. (part two) The leftists will reply that the last thing they want is to make the black man into a copy of the white man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But in what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It can hardly consist in anything more than eating black style food, listening to black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going to a black-style church or…
Video, posted without a caption
29. (part one) Here is an illustration of the way in which the oversocialized leftist shows his real attachment to the conventional attitudes of our society while pretending to be in rebellion against it. Many leftists push for affirmative action, for moving black people into high prestige jobs, for improved education in black schools and more money for such schools; the way of life of the black "underclass" they r…
💯1
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @wewhoslaydragons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“West Coast Action” (@wewhoslaydragons), 248 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wewhoslaydragons.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.