Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Литературный продукт Warhammer, 15%

Channel

Литературный продукт Warhammer, 15%

@wh40k_ru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,578subscribers

+224 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076009233
TypeChannel
Username@wh40k_ru
Created21 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wh40k_ru

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,3545,5785,4666 August 2026 — 5,354 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,354 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,355 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,359 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,369 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,436 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,451 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,460 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,463 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,476 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,534 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,570 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,578 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,320–5,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:545,578+8
12 Sept 2026, 13:585,570+36
8 Sept 2026, 18:195,534+58
3 Sept 2026, 09:285,476+13
31 Aug 2026, 07:055,463+3
27 Aug 2026, 23:125,460+9
25 Aug 2026, 04:485,451+15
22 Aug 2026, 03:555,436+67
18 Aug 2026, 12:175,369+13
15 Aug 2026, 19:455,356-3
12 Aug 2026, 11:555,359+4
9 Aug 2026, 13:215,355+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:205,354no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:195,354first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

910 reactions across 36 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30533.5%
👍14716.2%
13314.6%
😁13214.5%
🤔444.84%
🤡343.74%
🫡343.74%
🤣313.41%
😱283.08%
🤯70.769%
🍓50.549%
🙏40.44%
🥰30.33%
😡20.22%
🤨10.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 910 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 38 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wh40k_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC578 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Спустя годы рассказ Хейли «Зодчий Императора» стал только нажористее

🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC605 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Годами мы с Юрой подмечали, что у Хейли все персонажи похожи друг на друга. И мы раз за разом шутили, что он просто пишет персонажей с себя. Ну, теперь это уже не шутки

🤔18🤡3😁3

11 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈3,320 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Зарубежные юзеры уже ржут, как будет выглядеть настольный сороковник в 2030-м году #мем

😁15🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC722 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Гай Хейли писал Велизария Коула с себя. Гаю Хейли стыдно за это» На Реддите пользователь сделал конспект #интервью с Гаем Хейли и там есть несколько занятных подробностей про сеттинг. Мне больше всего понравилось то, как Коул стал «роялем в кустах» для проекта Примарис. Изначально у космодесантников планировали изменить только дальность стрельбы, но случился путанный творческий процесс изменений лора ради обоснов

🔥14😁8🤡51

10 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC932 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В комментариях спросили про Космических Волков, которые не вписываются в схему из 4-х популярных цветов. Ну, Космические Волки — это отдельная тема. В сообществе давно бытует мнение, что Волками ещё 30 лет назад играло начальство, поэтому они всегда получали особое отношение. Первые «настоящие» книги вышли именно про них, больше всего именных персонажей было у них, особых юнитов — тоже. В плане цвета они тоже осо

🔥254

10 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC940 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Разноцветная GW/BL+* теория заговора #мем Делимся байкой с Реддита: GW с самого начала решило, что будет продвигать ордены по основным цветам, и только по одному на каждый Красный — Кровавые Ангелы Синий — Ультрамарины Зеленый — Тёмные Ангелы Черный — Чёрные Храмовники Желтый и белый красить очень сложно, и новички могут разочароваться в себе, поэтому Имперских Кулаков и Белых Шрамов задвинули на вторые роли. А

😱193😁3👍2

9 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,020 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Пепел Империума» однозначно стоит читать #заметка На связи Антон Скнарь. Я пока в самом начале романа, но точно могу сказать: эта часть произведения ощущается как Эпилог к «Осаде Терры» и эмоционально давит не хуже «Эры Разрухи». В начале Крис Райт накидывает глав от лица предателей, которые застали на Терре смерть Хоруса и развоплощение варпа. Каждая из глав — как хороший самостоятельный рассказ, который работает

👍29🔥8🤔3🤡21

8 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,130 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У нас даже есть доказательства

😁26🔥11👍3

8 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,110 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Отвечаем, всё так и было

👍17🥰3🤡1

8 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,080 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы с Юрой нашли способ преобразить трейлер нейрослоп-мультфильма «Зов космоса: Битва за Нептун» Просто смотрите трейлер держа в уме бэк сороковника: Нептун, древняя планета по имперским меркам, была впервые колонизирована человечеством в эпоху Терры. В эру Раздора обитатели планеты мутировали в отвратительных существ, не похожих на людей. В начале Великого крестового похода задача завоевания Нептуна и его спутнико

🔥17😁7

8 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC920 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @elooopPhoto

В комментариях на ютюбе уже боты высадились Роскомос сняли ИИ-мультфильм, чтобы замотивировать детей поступать на профессии, связанные с космосом. Перед тобой не очередной нейрослоп из рилсов, а трейлер «Зова космоса: Битвы за Нептун». Студия «Матрёшка», которая сгенерировала это, с гордостью называет его «первым в России полнометражным анимационным фантастическим боевиком». «Зов космоса» даже доберётся до кинотеат

😱7🤡4

8 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC982 viewsread 12 August 2026

Это просто отвратительно, но у нас есть на эту тему разгон:

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @wh40k_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTCAnonymous Poll410 voters

Я

  1. Христианин15%
  2. Вархаммерист26%
  3. Атеи... то есть Альфариеист28%
  4. Я запутавшийся радикал и с момента ковида слабо понимаю себя и мир вокруг31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTCAnonymous Poll465 voters

У тебя на руках 800 000 рублей. Что купишь?

  1. Подержанный Hyundai Solaris15%
  2. Квартиру 20 квадратов в г. Сухой лог10%
  3. ПВЗ или ларёк с шаурмой15%
  4. Полную коллекцию «Ереси» на русском языке19%
  5. Вылечу все свои зубы41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Прогрев защитан?

  1. Да22%
  2. Д А17%
  3. Я — Саламандра, даже не вспотел31%
  4. Я — Альфарий, но лучше бы был Саламандрой49%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Warhammer: Чёрная Библиотека
@black_library1 · 34,904
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 September 2026
Hobsplay
@hobsplay · 24,169
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
ДиШ: фантастика и фэнтези
@fantasy_jedi · 28,391
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Мир кораблей
@korabli · 55,876
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Литературный продукт Warhammer, 15%” (@wh40k_ru), 5,578 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wh40k_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.