Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Литературный продукт Warhammer, 15%

Channel

Литературный продукт Warhammer, 15%

@wh40k_ru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,755subscribers

+401 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076009233
TypeChannel
Username@wh40k_ru
Created21 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wh40k_ru

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,3545,7555,554.56 August 2026 — 5,354 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,354 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,355 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,359 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,369 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,436 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,451 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,460 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,463 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,476 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,534 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,570 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,578 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,652 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,705 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,711 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,708 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,712 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,729 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,741 subscribers27 October 2026 — 5,749 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,746 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,753 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,755 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,294–5,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:015,755+2
2 Nov 2026, 09:165,753+7
30 Oct 2026, 15:285,746-3
27 Oct 2026, 06:015,749+8
24 Oct 2026, 03:205,741+12
21 Oct 2026, 06:075,729+17
18 Oct 2026, 06:185,712+4
15 Oct 2026, 13:315,708-3
12 Oct 2026, 23:445,711+6
6 Oct 2026, 15:025,705+53
29 Sept 2026, 10:385,652+74
15 Sept 2026, 19:545,578+8
12 Sept 2026, 13:585,570+36
8 Sept 2026, 18:195,534+58
3 Sept 2026, 09:285,476+13
31 Aug 2026, 07:055,463+3
27 Aug 2026, 23:125,460+9
25 Aug 2026, 04:485,451+15
22 Aug 2026, 03:555,436+67
18 Aug 2026, 12:175,369first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 5,755 subscribers
Avg views / post
617
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held50 (28 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total7,402
Reactions total213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,123 reactions across 48 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥33930.2%
❤21919.5%
👍16614.8%
😁14312.7%
🤡746.59%
🤔575.08%
🫡383.38%
😱322.85%
🤣312.76%
🍓70.623%
🤯70.623%
🙏40.356%
🥰30.267%
😡20.178%
🤨10.089%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 50 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wh40k_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.00%
1 of 50 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
619
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,040
over 49 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGT1GJE14 November 20264 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 18:38 UTC248 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Сыграли бы в такое? Принимаются только честные ответы

🤡8❤6🍓2👍1

4 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC301 views23 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

— Если бы фемкустодианки выглядели так, кого бы от этого корежило? — Хейтеров нейрослопа #мем

🤡13❤10

4 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC544 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

- Эй, Четвëрка, принимай пополнение! - Такого примарха тебе нарисовали! Образованный! Воитель! #мем

❤15🤡4😁2👍1

4 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC583 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Выход 530-го выпуска White Dwarf вновь порвал людей в Х #мем Вспомнили старое, пошутили про голливудских звезд, которые сейчас в тренде. Но мне больше всего понравился твиттерский тысячник, который коллекционирует твиты квир-фанатов фемкустодес и параллельно постит мемы о том, что фанаты сороковника аутисты. Проблема понятна, шитпост продолжить.

❤15👍1

4 Nov 2026, 13:40 UTC602 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Твоя жертва не будет напрасной, брат #мем Подписчик играл ирл 1in8b и на старте выбрал себе как основу личности Кровавых Ангелов: Так получилось, что в моей жизни был период, когда я очень сильно стремился радикально улучшить свою внешность посредством спорта. И я не уверен, справился бы я или нет, если бы не нравящиеся мне образы из вселенной warhammer, с которыми я очень хотел быть хотя бы чуточку схожим. Так что…

❤8👍1

4 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC619 views19 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGT1GJEPhoto

«Немирстиба»: вышел новый российский анимационный сериал В центре сюжета проекта, созданного при поддержке ИРИ, — два друга, Ян и Виктор. Они одержимы поисками секрета бессмертия, и их приключение наполнено загадками, мистикой и непростыми решениями. Обязательно зацените «Немирстибу» по ссылке (там 6 серий).

🤡11❤6🫡2

4 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC722 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026

В комментариях вновь спрашивают про цикл «Примархи». У нас есть что ответить: 1. Что стоит читать, а что можно скипнуть — https://t.me/wh40k_ru/3536 2. Что вообще случилось с серией — https://t.me/wh40k_ru/3537 3. Последние повести цикла вышли в 2022 году. Сейчас свой сольник не получил только Хорус Луперкаль 4. Про детство Хоруса выходил шизо-рассказ Lupus Daemonis В детстве Хорус был опущенным у бандитов подул…

🔥6❤4

4 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC686 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Теорема Геймса Ворксшопа: шо то Йен Уотсон, шо это Мэтт Вард. И оба подхода я комьюнити продавал #мем

👍4😱4

4 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC666 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Итог вчерашнего обсуждения Владений в Age of Sigmar: Если ты это способен разобраться в устройстве мира, то тебе нечего делать в этом сеттинге Шизо-схема Владений в наличии #мем

❤5👍3🫡2

4 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC645 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Их амбиции было ничем не сдержать #заметка Как в Games Workshop рассказать о всех примархах, но у них ничего не вышло Вернёмся в 2016-й год с помощью машины времени Web Archive*. Как вы помните — GW прибило сайт BL, а вместе с ним мы потеряли доступ ко всему архиву новостей компании. Так вот. В марте 2016-го BL анонсировали подцикл «Примархи» и пообещали за 4 года издать 18 повестей. Сейчас это воспринимается как н…

❤14🔥8👍4

4 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC788 views31 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Фанаты Warhammer 40000 смотрят на фанатов Age of Sigmar #мем

🔥18😁9❤3🤡1

3 Nov 2026, 12:38 UTC998 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Восемь Владений отдела маркетинга мешают вахану сосредоточиться на высоком фэнтези #заметка В комментариях в тг-канале разгорелось обсуждение, которое происходит каждый раз при столкновении фаната сороковника с миром Age of Sigmar. Речь про Владения Смертных. Несколько лет назад мы уже писали о том, что Age of Sigmar — это вселенная из 8 Плоских Миров, в центре которых кипит разумная паропанк-средневековая жизнь, а…

🤔13👍4🤡3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @wh40k_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTCAnonymous Poll410 voters

Я

  1. Христианин15%
  2. Вархаммерист26%
  3. Атеи... то есть Альфариеист28%
  4. Я запутавшийся радикал и с момента ковида слабо понимаю себя и мир вокруг31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTCAnonymous Poll465 voters

У тебя на руках 800 000 рублей. Что купишь?

  1. Подержанный Hyundai Solaris15%
  2. Квартиру 20 квадратов в г. Сухой лог10%
  3. ПВЗ или ларёк с шаурмой15%
  4. Полную коллекцию «Ереси» на русском языке19%
  5. Вылечу все свои зубы41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Прогрев защитан?

  1. Да22%
  2. Д А17%
  3. Я — Саламандра, даже не вспотел31%
  4. Я — Альфарий, но лучше бы был Саламандрой49%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Warhammer: Чёрная Библиотека
@black_library1 · 35,297
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 September 2026
Hobsplay
@hobsplay · 24,266
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
ДиШ: фантастика и фэнтези
@fantasy_jedi · 29,539
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
ТехноМакс: Максим Багаев
@Tehnomaks · 40,531
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
Мир кораблей
@korabli · 54,791
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Литературный продукт Warhammer, 15%” (@wh40k_ru), 5,755 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wh40k_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.