Channel
@whang256
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,298subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002183531310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whang256 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whang256 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 2,298 | -32 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:48 | 2,330 | -30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 2,360 | +84 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,276 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,489 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 【府上小汤圆 抽奖活动】 🎫 加入的前置频道： 🎫 加入 —— 佛山嫩妹甄选府 🎫 加入 —— 佛山嫩妹甄选榜 🎫 加入 —— 佛山嫩妹【备用榜】 🎫 加入 —— 佛山嫩妹甄选轮播群 🎫 加入 —— 佛山嫩妹备用榜单 🎫 加入 —— 嫩妹名探府【备用】 🎫 加入 —— 佛山小汤圆（可舌吻） 🎟️ 要求活动期间群内发言数 30 🎁 奖品内容： 半价/p × 1 100优惠卷 × 5 PP优惠200卷 × 5 💡 活动说明： 👉🏿1 自开奖时间起 3天内有效 ∴ 请在3日内约课（7天内兑奖） 👉🏿❷炸号中奖作废！ 👉🏿❸出击完7日内提供详细的报告提交: @@Fndxbgbot （否则拉黑挂榜） 👉🏿❹ 严禁转让，买卖 发现后永久拉黑！ 老师兑奖严格按照 开奖信息 跳转兑奖！跳转兑奖 📅 开奖日期： (UTC + 8) 2026年09月02日 14时59分27秒 ⚡️ 加成说明： ⚡️ 加…
雨天适合一起看雨
上学了
到佛山了，明天开课😍
休息一一个星期开课通知
雨天适合约起来
Posted without readable text
【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/NNnmmtfzz 【老师艺名】小汤圆 【联系方式】@yuiyui158 【所在位置】桂城 【验证留名】野火 【验证时间】8.16 【修车费用】600p(单p优惠100 【颜值身材】8 【服务内容】表上的都有 【服务态度】10 【优点缺点】很健谈，人照8成。 【推荐程度】8 【体验细节】 中这个单p优惠一个星期了，一直不在佛山，老师好说话给我延迟到了下周六，就约好时间出发。没想到2：30还不是头课。 去课室有点复杂，要从车库上去，从大堂上去要登记，建议打车或者开车，不然很麻烦。 上到课室留好门，看到小汤圆穿着一席长裙在等我，对我微微一笑，其实和照片不太一样，但是也是非常漂亮，很有气质的那一种，很瘦，有点皮包骨的感觉了。 交完水费后一起洗澡，老师特别爱干净，来回洗了很多次🐥🐥，很健谈一直在聊天，不会冷场。 躺床上之后，又聊起被借钱的事情，一边口一边聊，就像朋友见面一样。口活…
美食美女
开课了
有位同学们
上课了
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whang256. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“佛山小汤圆（可舌吻）” (@whang256), 2,298 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whang256.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.